Friday, October 3, 2025
Home Blog Page 2398

Many small holes can sink a big ship

0

Where-ever I go and what ever place I visit, sooner or later I will make a visit to the restroom, also known as washroom, toilet or WC, depending on what part of the world you come from. My wife is able to resist the calls of Mother Nature much more, avoiding the hygiene hazards that present themselves in these public-private places. She has a point, especially taking into account the common hygiene standards in this country. But apart from the hygiene conditions, it is the functional state of affairs that many toilets are in, that I am concerned about. As I mentioned in an earlier article, the toilet seats are normally broken, disconnected and parked behind the toilet next to the cover of the flusher. Why they are kept there I don’t know. Maybe in case somebody will be in a maintenance mood one day. The flushing mechanism itself is normally an adaptation of the original design and to flush the user will have to pull up a string or a wire that is connected to the stopper. To wash your hands, you don’t really have to open the tap as it is left open or doesn’t close anymore. You know what I mean. Yes, the items selected during the building process may have been cheaper, but they don’t last longer so they are more expensive in the end. I normally try to make a case for higher standard and quality building materials and the wise investor will prevent many unnecessary maintenance and repair costs after completion of the building. Let us look a bit deeper into some of the consequences of our dysfunctional restroom though. More often than not the stopper of the toilet doesn’t do what it is supposed to do, namely stopping water from draining into the toilet unless it is flushed on purpose. As a result, the flusher container doesn’t fill up and the water keeps on passing through the flusher container into the toilet and down into the sewage system or septic tank. Let us make some calculations now. A normal flusher container has a capacity of some 5 litres of water. So, every time we flush the toilet, we use 5 litres of water; treated water that is. With a family size of five and each member using the loo twice a day, this amounts to 50 litres per day. Let us assume that after it has been flushed it takes 4 minutes for the container to fill up again. That is a flow of 1.25 litres per minute. In case the stopper does not function, and the inlet is left open all day, this amounts to a loss of 1.25x60x24=1800 litres of water per day. Or 12,600 litres of water per week, or 50,400 litres of water per month! And this is only for one toilet. The 1800 litres lost in one day through one dysfunctional toilet is equivalent to what could save 360 drought victims if their ration is reduced to 5 litres of water per day. Normally an amount of 20 litres per person per day is calculated for people who live in drought prone areas. The standard for Addis Abeba is 80 litres per day. During drought emergencies, and we are facing a serious drought emergency right now, many organizations are busy trucking water to drought-stricken areas, while in other parts of the country it is left to go down the drain without having even flushed our waste. Studies show that 20% of water is normally lost through leakages in the water system of cities in industrial nations like UK and the Netherlands. For Addis Abeba this amounts to some 37%. And this is before it passes the water meter into buildings and our homes, after which some water will find its way through any leakages in our domestic system directly to the sewage system; treated but unused. And what does this do to our water bill? Let us have a look. According to my water bill, one cubic meter of water costs Birr 1.60 or Birr 2.85, depending on the block of the consumption. The more you consume, the more water passes through your meter and the more you are pushed to the higher consumption rates. A loss of 50,400 litres or 50.4 cubic meters through one dysfunctional toilet would thus amount to a monthly charge by the Water & Sewerage Authority to Birr 80.60 in the first consumption block or Birr 143.64 in the second. You can work out yourself what that means per year and realise how many new toilets of a better quality that would buy. So having leakages in the water system in our house is like having a hole in our pocket. And if you frequent hotels and restaurants, you now realise what your room rate and your meal’s bill include as well. Maybe that is what is referred to as service charge? Realising how valuable water is for the country as a natural resource, we all have in my opinion a responsibility to maintain and repair the water system in our houses and offices, while the authorities could set minimum quality standards for any plumbing materials to be brought into the country. A lot of money that is now lost could thus be saved.
I want to take this example a step further though and make us realise that we may be losing a lot of money through seemingly small “leakages” in our business. I think for instance of unnecessary phone calls, private use of telephone and internet, wastage of raw materials, wastage of fuel because of unplanned logistics, damage to materials and equipment, no regular maintenance, taking home small items, private use of stationeries, leaving unnecessary lights on, leaving the water tap open, using low quality materials, coming late for work, extended lunch brakes, absence from work, not to forget the ongoing World Cup as the latest excuse for leaving the office early to watch our favourite teams play.
And so I’d like to leave you with the following assignment:
Thoroughly check what seemingly small leakages exist in your company.
List them and calculate what they cost you per month.
After recovering from the shock now work out a way to close each leakage.
Smile again as you are now beginning to save a substantial amount of money.
Remember, many small holes can sink a big ship. Think again.

Ton Haverkort
ton.haverkort@gmail.com

Capturing diplomatic relations through creative writing

The Embassy of the Republic of Indonesian in Addis Ababa organizes a creative writing competition for Ethiopian students.
In order to introduce Indonesia to Ethiopian students and the younger generation in wide, particularly middle and senior high school students, the Indonesian Embassy in Addis Ababa in collaboration with the Indonesia-Ethiopia Friendship Club and the St. Daniel Comboni School in Hawassa City has organized a writing competition about Indonesia and its relations with Ethiopia.
The writing competition, which was started on 26 March 2022, saw 117 students participating from various secondary schools in Hawassa. The writings were selected by juries from the Indonesia-Ethiopia Friendship Club, Dubale Gebeyehu and Meaza Haddis, as well as Nurika S.M. Margono from the Indonesian Embassy in Addis Ababa.
On Friday, 20th May 2022, the winners of the competition were announced by the organizers in a special event at St. Daniel Comboni School. The event was attended by the head of the school, teachers and more than 800 students. The winners received trophies, certificates and cash prizes. The winning trophy was handed over directly by the Indonesian Ambassador, Al Busyra Basnur.
The first winner went to Ruth Asfaw (St. Daniel Comboni School) with an article titled “Students’ connectivity; How to strengthen it”; the second winner saw Meklit Abera (St. Daniel Comboni School) picking the award with an article titled “How to increase student connectivity between Ethiopia and Indonesia”; and coming in third was Ahadu Abayneh (BnB School) with an article titled “Bersama.”
Meanwhile, 4th and 5th winners were Abigya Salomon (St. Daniel Comboni) with an article titled “How to increase students’ interconnectivity” and Endrias Eshetu (BnB School) with an article titled “Indonesia-Ethiopia; How to increase student connectivity.”
“The winners and about 20 participants with the best writings will be invited to the Indonesian Embassy in Addis Ababa on 28 May 2022 to see the Indonesian Embassy, including seeing the Asia-Africa Museum which will be inaugurated on 27 May 2022,” said Ambassador Al Busyra Basnur, adding that this was the first writing competition for students regarding both countries diplomatic ties, as a result he underlined that students should witness firsthand the works of the embassy and the rich diplomatic history.

16th Addis International Film Festival

Hosted by Initiative Africa the 16th Addis International Film Festival will come to an end today May 29 at the Italian Cultural Institute. The opening ceremony was also held on May 25th at the Italian Cultural Institute. The 2022 Festival, the Opening Night Film was the World Premiere of “Among Us Women” directed by Sara Noa Bozenhardt. For the grand finale of five exciting days of screenings, the Closing Night Headliner will be “The Ins and Outs” directed by Yoannes Feleke.
The AIFF is an annual regional festival of films from around the world. Founded in 2007 by Kebour Ghenna, the festival initially screened ten films over 6 days at the then Addis Ababa Exhibition Center. The festival took place in various venues, but the regular venues remained Alliance Ethio Française, Hager Fiker Theater and Italian Cultural Institute. This year these same three venues are retained.
Throughout its history, a myriad of celebrities – actors, producers, screenwriters, and directors – have been guests at the AIFF. This year the Festival hosts Daniel Kotter, Sara Noa Bozenhardt and Nefise Ozkal Lorentzen from Germen and Norway.

UN disasters report

0

By Bjorn Lomborg
Exclusive for Capital

A new United Nations report has revealed the disturbing news that the number of global disasters has quintupled since 1970 and will increase by another 40 percent in coming decades. They find that more people are affected by disasters than ever before, and the UN Deputy Secretary General warns humanity is “on a spiral of self-destruction.”
Astonishingly, the UN is misusing data, and its approach has been repeatedly shown to be wrong. Its finding makes for great headlines-but it just isn’t grounded in evidence.
When the UN analyzed the number of disaster events, it made a basic error-and one that I’ve called it out for making before: It basically counted all the catastrophes recorded by the most respected international disaster database, showed that they were increasing, and then suggested that the planet must be doomed.
The problem is that the documentation of all types of disasters in the 1970s was far patchier than it is today, when anyone with a cellphone can immediately share news of a storm or flood from halfway around the world.
That’s why the disaster database’s own experts explicitly warn amateurs not to conclude that an increase in registered disasters equates to more disasters in reality. Reaching such a conclusion “would be incorrect” because the increase really just shows improvements in recording.
You would think that the UN would know better especially when its top bureaucrats are using language that sounds like Armageddon is here.
Unsurprisingly, climate change is central to the UN agency’s narrative. Their report warns there is a risk of more extreme weather disasters because of global warming, so the acceleration of “climate action” is urgently needed. Somehow, the huge international organization has made the same basic fallacy that many of us do when we see more and more weather disasters aired on the TV news. Just because the world is more connected and we see more catastrophic events in our media doesn’t mean that climate change is making them more damaging.
So how do we robustly measure whether weather disasters really have really become worse? The best approach is not to count the catastrophes, but to look instead at deaths. Major losses of life have been registered pretty consistently over the past century.
This data shows that climate-related events-floods, droughts, storms, fires, and temperature extremes-are not actually killing more people. Deaths have dropped by a huge amount: In the 1920s, almost half a million people were killed by climate-related disasters. In 2021, it was less than 7,000 people. Climate-related disasters kill 99% fewer people than 100 years earlier.
The UN report does include a count of “global disaster-related mortality”-and manages to find that contrary to the international disaster database, deaths are higher than ever before. They reach this conclusion by bizarrely including the deaths from COVID in the catastrophes. Remember, Covid killed more people just in 2020 than all the world’s other catastrophes in the past half century. Lumping these in with deaths from hurricanes and floods inappropriately seem designed to create headlines rather than understanding, especially when the agency is using the findings to argue for an acceleration of climate action.
The truth is that deaths from climate disasters have fallen dramatically because wealthier countries are much better at protecting citizens. Research shows this phenomenon consistently across almost all catastrophes, including storms, floods, cold and heat waves.
This matters, because by the end of this century, there will be more people in harm’s way, and climate change will mean sea levels rise several feet.
One comprehensive study shows that at the beginning of the 21st century, around 3.4 million people experienced coastal flooding each year, causing $11 billion in annual damages. About $13 billion or 0.05% of global GDP was spent on coastal defenses.
If we do nothing and just keep coastal defenses as they are today, vast areas of the planet will be routinely inundated by 2100, with 187 million people flooded and damage worth $55 trillion annually. That’s more than 5% of global GDP.
But we will obviously adapt, especially because the cost is so low. That means fewer people than ever will be flooded by 2100. Even the combined cost of adaptation and climate damages will decrease to just 0.008% of GDP.
These facts show why it’s important that organizations like the UN deliver us the real picture on disasters. The UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction has bad form for making unfounded claims. Instead of headline-chasing with dodgy math and frightening language, the UN should do better-and it should be focused on championing the importance of innovation and adaptation, to save more lives.

Bjorn Lomborg is President of the Copenhagen Consensus and Visiting Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. His latest book is “False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet.”