Sunday, November 2, 2025
Home Blog Page 2698

Metsehet Yelima

Name: Metsehet Yelima

Education: Degree in Management

Company name: Yam Packed Foods

Title: Co-owner and manager

Founded in: 2021

What it does: Make different kinds of packed foods

HQ: Addis Ababa around Hayat

Number of employees: 2

Startup Capital:100,000 birr

Current capital: Growing

Reasons for starting the business: To create a strong family business

Biggest perk of ownership: Trying what we want to do

Biggest strength: Good at creating new things

Biggest challenging: Capital, bureaucracy

Plan: To expand the business and open our hotel

First career: Manager at a hotel

Most interested in meeting: No one

Most admired person: My sister

Stress reducer: Swimming

Favorite past time: Time with my family

Favorite book: Born a crime, by Trevor Noah

Favorite destination: China

Favorite automobile: Ford

No, China’s Belt & Road Initiative is not falling apart

0

A new ‘study’ has concluded that Beijing’s huge worldwide investment programme is “losing momentum” as debts mount. But a closer inspection of the facts tells a different story
Western mainstream media yesterday began posting in tandem a purported ‘study’ from which Reuters spun its own headline: ‘China’s Belt and Road plans losing momentum as opposition, debt mount – study’.
The study, as noted in the report, was sponsored by the US government through the surrogate of its own international relief agency, USAID, and proceeded to present the usual cliches that China was maliciously saddling nations in “hidden debt,” encouraging corruption and promulgating environmental damage in participating countries, and claimed that opposition to the investment programme was mounting.
The publication of this report coincidentally came in the same week as US officials commenced a tour of Latin America in order to counter China’s mega investment there under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This follows a G7 pledge in July to launch a global infrastructure development, dubbed Build Back Better World (B3W), as a counterweight to Beijing’s BRI.
Funny how all that’s needed if BRI is failing as badly as the ‘study’ claims.
This is not a coincidence. The report is essentially a sneaky US government public relations stunt weaponized toward disparaging China. Propaganda, in other words.
The United States is skilful in, and has a long history of, meting out its foreign policy talking points through various ‘studies’ via linked organizations and groups that present an illusion of independence, which then the mainstream media always amplify in a concerted campaign. We’ve seen this happen in numerous areas, most prominently with the Xinjiang autonomous region and allegations of forced labor in the first half of this year.
It is strange that large scale emphasis on that has disappeared, and now the agenda is being turned toward trashing the Belt and Road Initiative. But we knew this was coming. When the US Senate prepared its ‘strategic competition’ bill earlier this year, it notably earmarked $300 million in funding to deliberately spread “negative news” regarding “the impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative” throughout the world. To no surprise whatsoever, this is what the newly published BRI ‘study’ is doing, and it’s a sign of things to come.
Is Belt and Road really failing and losing momentum? That’s the spin which Reuters takes, but evidence strongly suggests otherwise. Often with mainstream media reporting on the BRI, you hear almost exclusively about the small number of BRI projects which are failing or mired in local controversy, as these are the ones which they hope will set the narrative and define the project in a critical and controversial light. It’s true, for example, that some BRI projects in Malaysia have been canceled, such as the proposed high speed railway linking Kuala Lumpur to Singapore.
The MSM narrative predictably seizes on these developments and makes sweeping generalizations, ignoring other circumstances that might lie behind the setbacks. For example, the Malaysia high-speed railway was a casualty of the global economic slowdown caused by the Covid pandemic, which placed financial strain on the governments involved and forced them to make cuts.
Yet the event is spun as a ‘backlash’ to China or even as a “high speed railway” to nowhere. In such a huge programme such as BRI, spanning almost $1 trillion and thousands of projects worldwide, it is inevitable that some will not materialize.
And Western MSM makes sure that you don’t hear of the BRI projects that are successful, because portraying China’s contributions in a positive light effectively amounts to a form of blasphemy.
Here’s a flavor of what they aren’t telling you. A study from Refinitiv, one of the world’s largest providers of financial markets data and infrastructure, found that, as of 2019, over $516 billion worth of BRI projects had been completed with a cancellation rate of just 0.3%. It counted 2,631 different projects across the world, in more than 120 countries.
To name but a few examples of BRI successes: China finished a metro system in Lahore, Pakistan, last year, opened a 1000MW nuclear power plant in the same country in May, is building Africa’s largest building in Egypt, as well as the largest building in South Asia (the Lotus Tower in Colombo, Sri Lanka), and is on the verge of finishing the China-Laos High Speed Railway. Multiple direct transcontinental railway routes through China to Europe have also been opened.
The study by Refinitiv, which is headquartered in the UK, also proceeded to pour cold water over the idea of a ‘debt trap’ for participating countries, noting that a review of 40 cases of China’s external debt renegotiations painted a different picture. The BRI is not being imposed, it is not dogmatic and nor is it monolithic, and it is more flexible and pragmatic than it’s given credit for.
When BRI projects are perceived as too expensive or unpopular, the host countries often renegotiate them with China, which generally adapts its position accordingly, making BRI far from being the zero-sum caricature which the US and its propaganda ecosystem accuses it of.
The idea that developing countries blindly and naively accept one-sided terms, jump into self-penalizing agreements, and thus don’t know ‘what their best interests are’, is insulting. It is promoting, as usual, the idea of ‘Western saviorism’, one that has been used as a justification for colonialism and domination for centuries. There is a staggering lack of historical self-awareness and sensitivity in those who advocate such claims.
The Belt and Road Initiative is probably the most smeared, exaggerated and misrepresented infrastructure scheme in history. For years, Washington has struggled to come up with an answer to China’s grand scheme due to constraints posed by its differing political-economic system, and has most of the time simply resorted to attacking and discrediting it.
The USAID-funded report is nothing more than a renewed and desperate assault, part of a politicized and concerted campaign that Washington hopes will manufacture consent for its foreign policy agenda. Its skewered narrative will downplay and silence the success of BRI projects at all costs, and play up isolated examples of failure in order to tarnish the scheme as a whole. But it isn’t based on reality, and the facts will speak for themselves.

Tom Fowdy is a British writer and analyst of politics and international relations with a primary focus on East Asia.

WTM Africa announces Reigniting Africa Travel & Tourism Award Winner

WTM Africa is excited to announce that luxury experiential travel company andBeyond is the winner of the Reigniting Africa Travel & Tourism Awards. Runner-up is Cape Nature, while The Art of Penguin Conservation received an honourable mention.
andBeyond won the award with the inspirational WILDwatch Live Safaris campaign, which was established during the COVID pandemic in conjunction with wildlife broadcasting experts WildEarth. The campaign saw andBeyond live stream twice-daily, three-hour live virtual safaris to keep Africa alive in the minds and hearts of travellers across the world. andBeyond guides were empowered and trained to share their passion for wildlife and conservation on camera.
“Through the Reigniting Africa Awards, WTM Africa was on the lookout for authentic and creative story-driven consumer or trade campaigns that brought Africa to life during the difficult COVID-19 period. andBeyond’s WILDwatch Live Safaris ticked all the boxes and wowed the jury. The campaign was beautifully executed through a variety of content types and truly kept the love of African safaris and conservation alive. It also proved to be an incredible way to raise much-needed funding for worthwhile conservation initiatives,” says Megan Oberholzer, Portfolio Director: Travel, Tourism and Creative Industries at RX Africa (Reed Exhibitions).
Cape Nature is a deserving runner-up with the #Nature Staycation campaign which encouraged local travellers to explore their own country. The campaign highlighted the importance of environmentally friendly and sustainable holidays.
“The judges absolutely loved the #Nature Staycation concept. In a time where travellers felt disoriented and confused about holiday options and possibilities, this campaign simplified travel and made the process feel safe and secure. It inspired confidence and clearly outlined opportunities for travellers,” says Oberholzer.
The Art of Conservation received an honourable mention not only for its conservation value, but also for the fact that the campaign focused on families and children and created new brand ambassadors for South Africa as a destination.
The Art of Penguin Conservation campaign, designed by Jon Monsoon in collaboration with Airbnb virtual experiences, provided insight and information about Cape Town and its endangered African penguins through hosting live, interactive webinars. It offered an engaging online activity, environmental education and an art class suitable for all ages at home during the lockdown.
“The judges were highly impressed by the quality of all the submissions received for this new and exciting award category. They were a true testimony of the passion, dedication and resilience of our incredible industry,” concludes Oberholzer.

There are positive developments on the ground in Syria, but for America it’s sanctions and suffering as usual

0

Jordan is reopening its border crossing with Syria and resuming flights to Damascus. In Syria, more armed groups are laying down their weapons. But amid these positive developments, the US is hunkering down to inflict more pain.
On September 29, Jordan’s Nassib border crossing to Syria re-opened, meaning a resumption not only of travel but of trade between the two nations. In early October, Royal Jordanian will start flying again to Syria’s capital.

In Syria’s south, after years of government and allied attempts to restore full peace, the last armed groups have finally laid down their weapons in Daraa, which journalist Vanessa Beeley wrote about after her recent return there.
And while the Biden administration recently changed talking heads in a Syria-related diplomatic position, little else has altered regarding America’s position on the country.
Sanctions against the Syrian people have continued under Biden, and at least 900 US troops continue to illegally occupy Syria.
Same old, same old for Syrians, who have endured 10 years of foreign war and terrorism against their country, as well as ten years of some of the most obnoxious lies and war propaganda.
In their September 13 meeting in Moscow, Presidents Assad and Putin made clear that while Syria continues to work towards restoring stability, doing so has been hampered by the presence of foreign troops not invited by the Syrian government and not under a mandate of the UN.
While speaking diplomatically, it is clear they meant the US and Turkish troops occupying areas of Syria, which – along with the proxy forces they support – bring the opposite of peace to Syrians.
However, type ‘Syria’ into your search engine of choice and you will still come across screaming headlines of inexplicable “violence” in Syria, and stories stating that Syria is “not safe” for the return of refugees. Many of these recent claims emanate from a recent update from the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria.
But this is not true. In fact, since Septmber 2015, nearly one million Syrians have returned to Syria, with another nearly 1.4 million internally displaced refugees resettling, according to the September 27, 2021 bulletin of the Center for Reconciliation of Opposing Sides and Control of the Movement of Refugees.
What the delusional articles omit are the real factors that make life in Syria difficult, and dangerous: the continued presence of Al-Qaeda affiliated groups in Idlib, terrorizing the population and firing on civilian areas in surrounding Hama and Aleppo provinces; and the deadly Western sanctions against Syrians, among other preventable factors.

Starving and thieving Syria

The latest news from the UN commission refers to fuel shortages and food insecurity without a mention of the many brutal Western sanctions against Syrians, once again showing that the supposed impartiality of the UN is non-existent.
I have written repeatedly about the deadly impact of sanctions, noting that they impact Syria’s ability to import medicines or the raw materials needed to manufacture them, plus medical equipment, machines, and materials needed for prosthetics, among other things.
The food insecurity mentioned by the UN commission comes as a direct result of sanctions which “cripple a state’s economy; disrupt the availability of food, medicines, drinking water, and sanitation supplies; interfere with the functioning of health and education systems; and undermine people’s ability to work.”
Deliberating causing the devaluing of the Syrian pound (as US envoy James Jeffrey boasted about) is not targeting the Syrian government; it is targeting the Syrian people. Western leaderships havesaid blatantly that sanctions will continue until Assad is deposed.
More recently, journalist Dan Kovalik was in Syria. He noted that, “10 years ago, abject poverty in Syria affected less than one percent of the population. By 2015, this had risen to 35 percent of the population. The rise in food prices – up 209 percent in the last year – is also noted.”
Indeed, the comparison of pre-war Syria and lack of abject poverty then rings true to what Syrians have told me over and over again in my visits to their country since 2014: that they were living well, in safety, and in harmony.
As for the increasingly debilitating effects of the sanctions, I saw life get increasingly more expensive. Syrians got more desperate during the six months I spent there last year, and again even more so this May and June, with skyrocketing prices meaning Syrians – despite working multiple jobs – can’t afford to put food on the table.
Under the Biden administration, the illegal US forces continue to pillage Syrian oil. Last year, I wrote about this theft of around $30 million a month. In March 2021, Syria’s petroleum minister compared the illegal US forces to “pirates” for plundering Syria’s oil, saying the US occupation has inflicted over $92 billion in damage on Syria’s petroleum sector.
Turkish-backed terrorists imprison, torture, and kill civilians (including children) in northeastern Syria, with Turkish forces themselves routinely shelling Syrian villages. Meanwhile, before his meeting with President Putin, Turkey’s Erdogan sent thousands more troops into Syria.
These are all factors contributing further to Syrians’ hellish circumstances and poverty, as well as factors omitted by most media and UN reports on Syria.

Peace-bringing reconciliation initiatives ignored

When armed groups reconcile with the state, laying down their weapons, they’re largely ignored by Western leaders, media, and the UN.
Indeed, the same UN report mentioned earlier claimed that under Assad’s leadership, there seem to be “no moves to unite the country or seek reconciliation.”
Reconciliations have been ongoing since the Reconciliation Ministry was established in 2012. Although the process is not perfect – the state cannot guarantee that armed groups who promise to cease violence against the state and population will adhere to their word – it is still the most peaceful option of enabling armed Syrian men to reintegrate into society, if they so choose.
How would America deal with such men on US soil? Kill them without blinking, most likely.
I interviewed the minister of reconciliation in 2014 and 2017, after the successes of returning peace to Homs, Aleppo, Madaya, and al-Waer, among others.
The objectives of reconciliation are the obvious restoration of security and enabling Syrians to return to their lives. But also, according to Minister Haidar, helping Syrians resolve their suffering in all respects: “Their security and safety, the economy, social services, education, the large number of martyrs and injured, the kidnapped, the missing, the internally displaced… We are trying to find a solution to each one of these cases. That is the deepest meaning of ‘reconciliation’: to return people to their normal lives.”
In our 2017 conversation, I asked the minister whether Syria had any outside support for reconciliation. Only, he said, from countries who are friends of Syria.

He said even the UN wasn’t interested.

“The UN during this period was siding with the Western policies, and not mentioning the achievement that the Syrian government has reached from these efforts. Western governments were against this project because it considered it a victory for the Syrian government and a major pillar for the unity of the Syrian people and the Syrian territories.”
At the end of our conversation, he made one particularly poignant point: “Most of the people that support the reconciliation process are the martyred’s families. For example, I was in a Latakia suburb and there I met a mother of four martyrs. She said, ‘I lost 4 children and I don’t want other mothers to suffer what I suffered.’”
Incidentally, the minister is also the father of a martyr: his son was gunned down by terrorists in 2012, in what Haidar described as an attempt on his own life.

Daraa, a long-awaited reconciliation

The UN commission called the restoration of peace to Daraa al-Balad an “unfolding tragedy.” That’s right, it is utterly tragic that armed extremists who have shelled, killed, and maimed civilians for years are finally laying down their weapons.
As Vanessa Beeley wrote, “The armed groups that had committed multiple war crimes and atrocities against Syrian civilians and anti-terrorism armed forces had no intention of relinquishing their campaign of retaliatory crimes against anyone they considered to be loyal to the Syrian government and state. A vicious offensive was unleashed by these extremist gangs formerly associated with terrorist Al-Qaeda and ISIS factions in the southern region.”
Further, it is truly tragic (sarcasm) that those terrorists can no longer shell and snipe the state hospital, preventing civilians from getting medical care, as they have done for years.
As I previously wrote, in May 2018 – before Daraa was fully liberated – I travelled in a hired taxi to areas which were under fire from terrorists, and took a perilous high-speed ride to the state hospital, down a road exposed to terrorist sniping from less than 100 metres away.
The hospital was battered and partially destroyed from terrorists’ mortars, and mostly empty of patients. The director showed me destroyed wards and off-limits areas due to the high risk of snipers.
In that article I noted that upon my return months later, I was able to see just how close the nearby terrorist headquarters had been to the hospital: 50 metres away, hence the extreme risk of being shot while inside the hospital.
So yes, UN and Western media, shed your tears that another reign of terror has come to an end.
And keep ignoring the brutal Western sanctions as you churn out more war propaganda against the Syrian people and ignore positive developments on the ground. Because you care so much for the Syrian people…

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian independent journalist and activist. She has spent years on the ground covering conflict zones in the Middle East, especially in Syria and Palestine