Saturday, April 4, 2026
Home Blog Page 3285

CAF president Ahmed facing possible FIFA ban

0

CAF president Ahmad Ahmad is facing a possible FIFA ban after allegedly breaching the world football governing body’s code of ethics.
Ahmad, who is also FIFA’s sitting vice-president, has reportedly fallen foul of the organization’s investigatory chamber who has found that the Malagasy official has breached “various codes of conduct”.
According to an exclusive report by BBC Sport Africa, the alleged breaches relate to Ahmad’s apparent involvement in CAF’s controversial deal with Tactical Steel, which also saw the 60-year-old face investigation by French anti-corruption authorities last year.
Ahmad, who is yet to be charged with any offence, previously described the accusations made against him as being “totally false, malicious and defamatory”.
The revelations come just one day after he announced his intention to run for a second term as CAF president, having held the position since 2017 when he ousted former chief Issa Hayatou.
In the mean time a letter has been sent to Confederation African Football (CAF) President Ahmed from 46 of the 54 member associations requesting him to run for a second year-term.
The presidency election is scheduled for Rabat next March and the 60-year-old has until November 12 to decide whether he will seek re-election. A simple majority –28 votes if each association participate is required to win the election but no official has announced their candidacy.

(BBC)

Very disappointed’ Kipchoge vows comeback after losing race to Ethiopia’s Kitata

0

Unbeaten for seven years, Eluid Kepchoge cracked at the end of the race and finished only 8th, with victory going to Ethiopia’s Shura Kitata after a thrilling spirit. Kitata won in 2 h 05 min 41 sec ahead of Kenya’s Vincent Kipchumba.
Regardless of the conditions and the opposition, Eliud Kipchoge had made a habit of continuing to write his legend. But for the first time in his marathon career, the Kenyan suffered a setback and was unable to overcome it. His only defeat came in Berlin in 2013, where he finished 2nd behind his compatriot Wilson Kipsang Kiprotich who set a new world record.
The best marathon runner in history (Olympic gold, world record in 2h01:39 in 2018 in Berlin, the two-hour barrier broken on an unofficial race in October 2019) may have felt the weight of the years as he celebrates his 36th birthday in November.
Nothing went as planned for the 40th London Marathon. Already, the race was disrupted by the pandemic of new coronavirus: postponed from April to October, it was run behind closed doors on an alternative course, a 2.15 km loop around St James Park, in front of Buckingham Palace.
Afterwards, everyone was expecting a legendary duel between the two best performers in history, Eliud Kipchoge and Kenenisa Bekele, but the Ethiopian withdrew on Friday (left calf injury) and the Kenyan cracked.
First for Kitata
“I’m very disappointed, I wanted to do better but my right ear became blocked and I felt a cramp and a problem with one hip in the last 15 kilometers,” Kipchoge told the BBC. I don’t blame the conditions”.
In a race that was run largely in the rain, with temperatures around 10 degrees, the best runners stayed together for a long time at a pace far from the world record. Then at the 38th kilometer came the surprise: with Shura Kitata accelerating, Eliud Kipchoge let go.
With the finish line just meters away, Shura Kitata broke away to dominate a breathless sprint against Vincent Kipchumba and compatriot Sisay Lemma.
The 24-year-old Ethiopian thus won his first major victory after collecting the top spots (2nd in London and New York in 2018, 4th in London and 5th in New York in 2019).
“I prepared very well for this race, Kenenisa (Bekele) helped and advised me in training,” said the winner on the BBC.

(BBC)

Temesgen Gebreselassie

Name: Temesgen Gebreselassie

Education: 10+2

Company name: BMT furniture

Title: CEO

Founded in: 2013

What it does: Manufacture different kinds of furniture

HQ: Bishoftu

Number of employees: 7

Startup Capital:  20,000 birr

Current capital:   600,000 birr

Reasons for starting the business: To become financially stable

Biggest perk of ownership: Financially stability

Biggest strength: self esteem

Biggest challenging: Market relation

Plan: To open a furniture factory

First career: Soldier

Most interested in meeting: No one

Most admired person: Haile Gebreselassie

Stress reducer: Listening classical music

Favorite past time: Time with my wife

Favorite book: Bible

Favorite destination: Church

Favorite automobile: Toyota pick-up

International Law vs. US President Donald Trump comment on ‘The $4.6 Billion Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’

0

On Friday October 23, 2020, US President, Donald Trump has made comment on his way during the announcement of normalisation of ties between Sudan and Israel via telephone discussion. He has tried to apply the principles of PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES which is embedded under CHAPTER VI of UN Charter, Article 33/1.
The charter under this article 33 sub-article 1 has stipulated that ‘The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice’. This has to be appreciated so long as it is meant for international peace and security. However, US President, Donald Trump’s way of thinking and action is not consistent across the board.
This means on the one hand, he tried to apply principles of peaceful settlement of disputes while on the other hand; he is breaching the same principle which is a clear manifestation of non-neutrality, bias, double standard and revenge. This is not blackmailing. It is possible to indicate two points.
The first is that the U.S. president Donald Trump earlier this year has told the State Department to suspend millions of dollars in aid to Ethiopia people. He said ‘They will never see that money unless they adhere to that agreement’. It is the manifestation of being annoyed by the action of Ethiopian Government and Ethiopian people to deviate from the way he think and planned in the dam dispute settlement among Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan, and Ethiopia walked away from those talks and bring the issue to AU. These actions made him to feel shame. Moreover, he was accused of being biased during his earlier efforts to broker a deal on the project among Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan.
Secondly, during the discussion with Sundance and Israeli officials, he has uttered inappropriate words whether it is intentionally or not on the ‘Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’ project. He said repeatedly ‘They (Egypt) will end up blowing up the dam’. And he said ‘I said it and I say it loud and clear … they’ll blow up that dam. And they have to do something.
He did not know who Ethiopians are. He has failed to recall the battle of Gundet, Gura, and Adwa but, it is clearly a threat to Ethiopian sovereignty which is misguided, unproductive, and clear violations of international law. Moreover, Egypt has repeatedly said that it wants to settle the dispute through diplomatic means, but it has also said that it would use “all available means” to defend its interests.
However, it is not clear whether the expression ‘all available means’ include war or not. Nevertheless, from point of view of Trump, it is unquestionable that the expression “all available means” includes war while he is instigating, inducing, encouraging, fuelling and giving hope for the Government of Egypt to blow up the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. In any case, it is a violation of international law. Let us see how it could be a violation of international law.
Pursuant to UN Charter article 23, United States of America is both a member of UN and permanent member of the Security Council along with the Republic of China, France, Russia, and United Kingdom.
Moreover, according to UN Charter article 1, the Purposes of the United Nations are to maintain international peace and security, and to that end to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of
acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace; to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights
and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace; to achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and to be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
In addition to these, according to UN Charter Article 2, the Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in the above, shall act in accordance with the following Principles. Such as: the Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members; all Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfil in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter of UN; all Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered; all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations; all Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action; the Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security; nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
Therefore, if one made analysis on what US President Donald Trump has said and the way he tried to instigate, induce, encourage, fuel and sponsor the war and conflict, and give hope for the Government of Egypt to blow up the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, it is unquestionable that it is in violation of international law, inter alia, charter of UN article 23, 1 and 2.
Hence, what to be done in the future is the question to be answered. 1st. All Ethiopians living in US must participate in the election company of 2020, convince other African fellows, and give vote for Biden and remove Trump from White House. Moreover, conduct protest against Trump all over America and Europe. Secondly, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ethiopia must demand an official explanation from Trump administration and give detail explanation and government stand on the matter. Thirdly, the Ethiopian Government has to bring the issue to the attention of AU and UN Security Council. Forth, domestically, all Ethiopians, civic societies, political parties, and religious organisations has act jointly against Trump actions and inactions. I wish a happy reading. You are welcome for any comments or suggestions.