Saturday, October 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 1880

Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare

0

In the face of urgent healthcare financing needs, the adoption of public-private partnerships (PPPs) provides a viable opportunity to deliver healthcare service in Ethiopia. PPPs, characterized by their innovation and efficiency, hold the potential to ease government budgetary pressures while addressing the escalating demand for healthcare services.  

By Eskedar Ezezew and Mekdes Mezgebu

Healthcare financing poses a serious challenge for developing countries. In 2001, African Union member states, under the Abuja Declaration, committed to allocate 15% of their national budgets to health. While Ethiopia has progressed in this front, increasing its health sector allocation to 10% of the total budget in 2021/22, it still falls short of the Abuja target. This gap underlines the ongoing challenge of meeting the committed funding and the need for additional measures to bridge the budgetary shortfall.

Ethiopia’s Health Sector Transformation Plan II (2020/2021 – 2024/2025) foresees private sector involvement as a mechanism to mitigate the financing gap. One approach is to implement public-private partnerships (PPPs).   

PPPs establish long-term partnership between the public and private sectors whereby a service or infrastructure ordinarily provided by the public sector is provided by the private sector with clear allocation of risks and responsibilities. In these partnerships, the private party assumes considerable risk and management duties. Unlike conventional procurement or outsourcing, PPPs transfer most of the risk associated with the design, construction, financing, operation, and maintenance of the infrastructure or service to the private sector. In return for an agreed output specification, the public sector compensates the private sector either through a fee-based structure or directly from end-users of the infrastructure facility.

Globally, PPPs have predominantly been utilized in the transportation, energy, and aviation sectors. Yet, in the past two decades, PPPs in social infrastructure projects such as health, education, housing, and waste management have taken root. The health sector has seen a notable increase in PPP usage. According to the Project Finance and Infrastructure Journal (IJGlobal), approximately 600 global healthcare infrastructure projects or assets, with a significant portion developed via PPPs.  

Health PPPs hold the promise of addressing several challenges and making substantial contributions to healthcare systems. Key among these includes the potential to increase healthcare access, facilitating the establishment of clinics, hospitals, diagnostic and imaging centers, dialysis centers, and mobile health units in urban and rural communities.  In addition, PPPs introduce private sector innovation, efficiency, and expertise, elevating the quality and range of healthcare services. This leads to better patient outcomes and satisfaction and results in the introduction of advanced technology and effective management practices that positively impact service delivery.

By leveraging private sector resources, PPPs hold the potential to optimize resource allocation and increase the cost-effectiveness and affordability of healthcare services. In countries like Ethiopia, where fees for public health services are set by law, the provision of high-quality private services at regulated prices offers significant advantages to the public.

Moreover, PPPs facilitate knowledge and skills transfer and capacity building. Through the integration of private sector services in public health systems, healthcare professionals in the public sector stand to gain immensely from the expertise, management practices, and technology-driven approaches of their private-sector counterparts. This exchange of knowledge and skills is instrumental in strengthening the capabilities of the health workforce, thereby enhancing the overall efficacy of the healthcare system.

While the advantages of PPPs in healthcare are substantial, implementing them comes with distinct challenges. Foremost among these is maintaining a balance of interests between private and public stakeholders.  Considering that the private sector assumes a significant portion of the financial risk, regulatory support and preparedness of the public sector is vital.  Ethiopia laid the groundwork for PPPs with a PPP policy in 2017, complimented by the PPP Proclamation No. 1076/2018, PPP Directive No. 55/2018, and establishing a dedicated PPP Unit within the Ministry of Finance. While these arrangements form a solid foundation for the procurement of PPP projects, their effectiveness remains to be tested.    

Furthermore, a PPP project design needs to be structured in a way that maintains the affordability of the services to the public while ensuring that the project remains profitable to the private sector. In Ethiopia, as public healthcare fees are regulated by law (at a highly subsidized and non-cost-reflective rate), the project structure needs to consider how a PPP initiative would be attractive to the private sector. For this reason, strong government support by way of guarantee or availability payments needs to be arranged.

Ethiopia’s governance structure also presents a distinct challenge while designing health PPPs. Successful health PPPs require the establishment of a robust, consistent, and reliable patient referral system, along with demand reliability. Navigating the intricacies of health sector governance both at the federal and regional levels under a centralized PPP framework poses unique challenges in project structuring and management of patient referrals. This, in turn, would require collaboration and commitment from the various public sector partners.

Ethiopia’s public health insurance system, encompassing the Community Health Insurance Scheme and the Social Health Insurance Scheme, introduces added complexity to the design and implementation of health PPPs. As a significant contributor to healthcare service delivery, the public health insurance provider, i.e., the Ethiopian Health Insurance Service, is a key actor responsible for covering healthcare costs for insurance members.  The payment terms to the private entity need to be aligned with the regulated fees and the intricacies of claim management of the insurance system.  

PPPs introduce new approaches to work and service delivery within public institutions. Integrating the existing civil service workforce into the PPP initiative (which may involve the recruitment, transfer, or replacement of civil servants) necessitates alignment between the civil service rules and regulations and the labour legislations for private employers.

PPPs for health service delivery offer a transformative opportunity for Ethiopia to address its multifaceted healthcare challenges. However, the successful implementation of PPPs in the health sector is contingent upon overcoming several challenges, including aligning the interests of public and private stakeholders, managing complex contractual and regulatory frameworks, ensuring equitable access, maintaining quality standards, and navigating the nuances of the health insurance system.

Given the significant public risk and the extensive institutional capabilities necessary for the successful deployment of PPPs, adopting a phased and flexible approach to implementation is prudent. This strategy allows for the careful assessment and management of risks at each stage, ensuring that lessons learned are integrated into future phases.  Ethiopia can build the necessary institutional framework and capacity gradually, minimizing potential pitfalls while maximizing the benefits of PPPs. Such an approach not only facilitates more effective risk management but also enhances the adaptability and resilience of PPP projects, ensuring they align more closely with the evolving needs and capacities of the country.  

The authors are lawyers at Mekdes & Associates, a boutique law office specializing in infrastructure and PPP projects. They can be reached at mekdes@mekdesmezgebu.com and eskedar@mekdesmezgebu.com

The Bag Show: Elevate Your Style!

0

The Bag Show, now in its 9th year, is a prestigious platform that showcases the exceptional talent of bag designers in Addis Ababa. This highly anticipated event not only celebrates creativity but also serves as a significant fundraiser for a local charity.

Following a rigorous selection process, twelve outstanding bag designers have been chosen by a distinguished panel of judges to participate in the Bag Show.

This year, the Bag Show will span two days, taking place on Friday, March 8 and Saturday, March 9, at the Musical Fountain, Sheraton Addis.

On the first day, Friday, the event will kick off with a captivating runway presentation, featuring the latest designs from the top twelve bag designers. Attendees will have the exclusive opportunity to preview and purchase these exquisite bags at a Pop-Up Sale following the show. This ticketed event will be held from 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm. Tickets can be purchased for 2000 ETB through Amole.

The excitement continues on the following day, with the continuation of the Pop-Up Sale, which will include a Design Market. This unique shopping experience will be open to the public from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm, and admission is free.

Not only does The Bag Show contribute to the local creative economy, but it also supports the community through its philanthropic efforts. All proceeds from ticket sales and 20% of the sales generated during the two-day Pop-Up Sale will be donated to Our Father’s Kitchen, a local charity affiliated with HIDO (Hiwot Integrated Development Organization). Our Father’s Kitchen aims to provide access to food and resources for a better future.

The Bag Show is part of the Dashen Culture Club series of events. Bag sales during the show will be facilitated by Dashen Bank Representatives, who will utilize secure hand-held payment terminals. Additionally, attendees will have the opportunity to open accounts with Dashen Bank and become members of the Dashen Culture Club.

Art exhibition by Fikru Gebremariam extended due to overwhelming response

0

The anticipated art exhibition by Fikru Gebremariam, initially scheduled to run from February 1 to February 29, 2024, has been met with such enthusiasm that it will now be extended for an additional month, until the end of March. The event, hosted by Alliance Ethio Franchise, has garnered significant attention both domestically and internationally, prompting organizers to prolong the showcase to accommodate the influx of visitors and media coverage.

As an independent artist boasting nearly three decades of experience, Fikru Gebremariam has solidified his reputation as a leading figure in the art world. Despite not completing his studies at Howard University, his artwork has captivated audiences across Ethiopia, Europe, and North America, drawing the admiration of discerning collectors worldwide.

Renowned for his innovative approach and inner creativity, Fikru’s recent painting, “Great Emotions,” fetched considerable attention and acclaim at Bonhams New Bond Street auction. With a career spanning over 20 years of dedication to stretched canvases, his artistic journey has seen a profound evolution marked by profound expression and ingenuity.

The exhibition, titled “CHASING DREAMS,” showcases a collection of 36 captivating works that resonate with contemporary themes and vibrant abstract styles. Held at the cultural hub of Addis Ababa, Alliance Ethio-Française, the event has captivated art enthusiasts with its bold and dynamic compositions, many of which span over 2.5 meters in width, bursting with color and vitality.

Reflecting on his artistic trajectory, Fikru reminisces about his humble beginnings at the Addis Ababa Art School, where his passion for painting first took root at the age of 11. Today, his works adorn galleries and collections worldwide, embodying a timeless allure that continues to inspire and captivate audiences across the globe.

The Rise of Modern Day  Socialists

0

Alazar Kebede

Throughout most of American history, the idea of socialism has been a hopeless, often vaguely defined dream. So distant were its prospects at midcentury that the best definition Irving Howe and Lewis Coser, editors of the socialist periodical Dissent, could come up with in 1954 was this: “Socialism is the name of our desire.”

That may be changing. Public support for socialism is growing. Self-identified socialists like Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib are making inroads into the Democratic Party, which the political analyst Kevin Phillips once called the “second-most enthusiastic capitalist party” in the world. Membership in the Democratic Socialists of America, the largest socialist organization in the country, is skyrocketing, especially among young people.

What explains this irruption? And what do we mean, in 2024, when we talk about “socialism”? Some part of the story is pure accident. Corey Robin, Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College and the City University of New York Graduate Center stated that in 2016, Mr. Sanders made a strong bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. Far from hurting his candidacy, the “socialism” label helped it. Mr. Sanders wasn’t a liberal, a progressive or even a Democrat. He was untainted by all the words and ways of politics as usual. Ironically, the fact that socialism was so long in exile now shields it from the toxic familiarities of American politics.

Another part of the story is less accidental. Corey Robin noted that since the 1970s, American liberals have taken a right turn on the economy. They used to champion workers and unions, high taxes, redistribution, regulation and public services. Now they lionize billionaires like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, deregulate wherever possible, steer clear of unions except at election time and at least until recently, fight over how much to cut most people’s taxes.

Liberals, of course, argue that they are merely using market-friendly tools like tax cuts and deregulation to achieve things like equitable growth, expanded health care and social justice which are the same ends they always have pursued. Kevin Kelly of Wired Magazine explained that for decades, left-leaning voters have gone along with that answer, even if they didn’t like the results, for lack of an alternative.

Socialism means different things to different people. For some, it conjures the Soviet Union and the gulag. For others, Scandinavia and guaranteed income. But neither is the true vision of socialism. What the socialist seeks is freedom.

John Altman, an American analyst argued that of under capitalism, people are forced to enter the market just to live. The libertarian sees the market as synonymous with freedom. But socialists hear “the market” and think of the anxious parent, desperate not to offend the insurance representative on the phone, lest he decree that the policy she paid for doesn’t cover her child’s appendectomy. According to Kevin Kelly, under capitalism, people are forced to submit to the boss. Terrified of getting on his bad side, people bow and scrape, flatter and flirt, or worse  just to get that raise or make sure they don’t get fired.

John Altman further noted that the socialist argument against capitalism isn’t that it makes people poor. It’s that it makes people unfree. When our well-being depends upon their whim, when the basic needs of life compel submission to the market and subjugation at work, we live not in freedom but in domination. Socialists want to end that domination: to establish freedom from rule by the boss, from the need to smile for the sake of a sale, from the obligation to sell for the sake of survival.

Listen to today’s socialists, and we will hear less the language of poverty than of power. They invokes the 1 percent and speaks to and for the “working class”, not “working people” or “working families,” homey phrases meant to soften and soothe. The 1 percent and the working class are not economic descriptors. They’re political accusations. They split society in two, declaring one side the illegitimate ruler of the other; one side the taker of the other’s freedom, power and promise.

Kenny Malone, economic analyst of Planet Money stated that like the great transformative presidents, today’s socialist candidates reach beyond the parties to target a malignant social form: for Abraham Lincoln, it was the slavocracy; for Franklin Roosevelt, it was the economic royalists. According to Kenny Malone, the great realigners understood that any transformation of society requires a confrontation not just with the opposition but also with the political economy that underpins both parties. For Lincoln in the 1850s confronting the Whigs and the Democrats, that language was free labor. For leftists in the 2010s, confronting the Republicans and the Democrats, it’s socialism.

To critics in the mainstream and further to the left, that language can seem slippery. With their talk of Medicare for All or increasing the minimum wage, these socialist candidates sound like New Deal or Great Society liberals. There’s not much discussion, yet, of classic socialist tenets like worker control or collective ownership of the means of production.

And of course, there’s overlap between what liberals and socialists call for. But even if liberals come to support single-payer health care, free college, more unions and higher wages, the divide between the two will remain. Danielle Kurtzleben, another economic analyst of Planet Money explained that for liberals, these are policies to alleviate economic misery. For socialists, these are measures of emancipation, liberating men and women from the tyranny of the market and autocracy at work. Back in the 1930s, it was said that liberalism was freedom plus groceries. The socialist, by contrast, believes that making things free makes people free.

According to Danielle Kurtzleben, it’s also important to remember that the traffic between socialism and liberalism has always been wide. The 10-point program of Marx and Engels’s “Communist Manifesto” included demands that are now boilerplate: universal public education, abolition of child labor and a progressive income tax. It can take a lot of socialists to get a little liberalism: It was socialists in Europe, after all, who won the right to vote, freedom of speech and parliamentary democracy. Given how timid and tepid American liberalism has become, it’s not surprising that a more arresting term helps get the conversation going. Sometimes nudges need a nudge.

Still, today’s socialism is just getting started. It took Lincoln a decade plus a civil war, and the decision of black slaves to defy their masters, rushing to join advancing Union troops to come to the position that free labor meant immediate abolition.

In magazines and on websites, in reading groups and party chapters, socialists are debating the next steps: state ownership of certain industries, worker councils and economic cooperatives, sovereign wealth funds. Once upon a time, such conversations were the subject of academic satire and science fiction. Now they’re getting out the vote and driving campaigns. It’s too soon to tell whether they’ll spill over into Congress, but events have a way of converting barroom chatter into legislative debate.

As Corey Robin noted, socialism is not journalists, intellectuals or politicians armed with a policy agenda. As Marx and Engels understood, this was one of their core insights, what distinguished them from other socialist thinkers, ever ready with their blueprints, it is workers who get us there, who decide what and where “there” is.  That, too, is a kind of freedom. Socialist freedom.