Tuesday, September 30, 2025
Home Blog Page 2359

TRUTH IN SOCIETY

0

Modern states/societies have developed quite a knack for effectively manipulating their sheeple, (human mass) without employing much coercion. If truth be told, modern societies are nothing more than dystopian constructs of the Huxley-ian genre (Adolf Huxley). On the other hand, traditional societies or what still remains of them, tend to stick to the visibly obvious, as they have less resources/tools (both physical & institutional) to pursue refined manipulative technics. As a result, truth/facts are/were upheld without much superficial consternation, unless of course religions or other metaphysical inclinations are/were let loose on the whole society.

At this point in history, it might be more appropriate to label the so-called traditional societies as mere transitional, as they are fixated in pursuing their ‘development’ trajectories based on the beaten track. In contrast to the industrially advanced countries of the West, those in serious transition are more eager to utilize coercion as opposed to subtle persuasion, to have their ways with their sheeple. In other words they are closer to the Orwellian dystopia than is the case in the West! Nonetheless, transitional societies are in a fix, so to speak. Figuring out (on their own) how to handle their existence vis-à-vis the collapsing biosphere, to say nothing about the accelerating demise of the modern world system, (in which they are situated) is overwhelming. Despite the prevailing superficial and cynical rhetoric of the global status quo, there is just no way to alleviate the protracted problems of transitional societies, without honestly appreciating their current and impending predicament within the existing global order. Unless these societies persistently pursue a more sustainable trajectory, outside of the ‘reigning box’, their future is doomed!

The task at hand, globally speaking, should be an overriding preoccupation to conceive and implement a more resilient green economy with a workable social order! Unfortunately, instead of entertaining a new global order that can potentially secure peace and stability; dominant interests have decided to become increasingly bellicose to all and sundry. As problems intensify, the tendency of dominant interests is usually to push the same old ‘growth paradigm’ as a panacea to all the myriad problems humanity. From climate change to nuclear weapons, from financial crisis to mass migration, etc. what is continuously suggested is not an open and honest discussion/debate about the potential solutions to what ails the world, but rather the propagation of lies, more lies and statistics, to use Twain’s description. In this whole callous calculus the sheeple is intentionally put to sleep, so to speak. ‘Scientific Indoctrination’ a la Edward Bernays is now a common feature of all states, strong or otherwise.

The dominant global media/Main Stream Media (MSM), as part and parcel of the ‘deep state’, is fully engaged in the on-going global indoctrination process. Be that as it may, recent findings seem to indicate the global sheeple is finally waking up from its long slumber. No wonder, the ‘deep state’ is deeply disturbed. (Deep state = military-intelligence-industrial-banking-media complex.) When the US President tells (in a round about ways) the obvious truth that the US government actually and regularly kills people (under various pretexts) in many countries, many an indoctrinated audience gets shocked, not because what was said is incorrect, but telling the truth in public has become a sort of crime! This insanity now prevails in many of the nation states of the world. Unless the sheeple is told the truth, or at least is allowed to find out the truth on its own, (when possible) going forward might not be all that harmonious and peaceful. Sticking to the old Bernays’ logic cannot bring amicable solutions to our vexing problems. However effective the old technic has been so far, it might not stand against the formidable contraption of the Internet. Modern informatics has rendered the monopoly of information untenable! Moreover, the sheeple has also become increasingly aware of the futility of the absurd destructive paradigm of the global status quo: ‘non-stop growth on a finite planet possible’!

Admitted or not, in our current scenario, it is not humanity that is sustaining and creating appropriate global values, which still remain the non-negotiable core to sustaining peaceful coexistence. Today, it is capital that has become our true counselor/guide to our various moral undertakings! For example, the sheeple might resolve that burning fossil fuel is suicidal; but the overriding decisions in the matter will be settled by capital and capital alone (in most cases), via its psychopathic minions. Currently, there are only a handful of media organizations dominating the airwaves. In fact, there are only six corporations that account for over 90% of broadcasting in the US, by extension, a good portion of the world. In addition to these, the few state owned media outlets merely follow the template/diktat of the value-setting dominant corporate media! Even though these private media outlets are losing money by the bushel, they keep on operating, because they are already owned by wealthy ‘god fathers’ with deep pockets. After all, media is not a mere business geared towards the sole purpose of making profit. It is a powerful tool to influence (create destructive values; like upholding the ‘values’ of lies, etc.) and unleash distorted views/opinions on the unsuspecting sheeple. The truth is; in the market place, the global sheeple has started to turn off MSM, since their lies have become obvious and suffocating! ‘Fake News’ to use President Trump’s phrasing!

The global sheeple needs community owned media outlets committed to conveying truth and facts as they occur. In late modernity, advertisement money oppressively & effectively muzzles truth/facts in the private media, while state owned ones only choose to follow the party (ruling) line. To have independent and viable media, the state must avail public resources, including money, to organizations that are run independently for the sole benefit of informing and enlightening the public! This should be done without interference in regards to, amongst other things, contents and editorials! After all, being well informed and truthfully so, is another of the modern ‘Commons’ and should not be treated as if it were aspect of special interests. Amongst the major prevailing media outlets in the world, only ‘Russia Today’ is closest to the ideal of independent media. Other countries, must try to come up with their own media that are fully dedicated to ‘truth telling.’ This is especially important in countries where the sheeple is still very sheeple-ish (innocent of the hidden workings of the modern world system) like in Africa. Beware; indoctrination instigates insurrection!

FLYING BACK HIGHER

0

Marie Owens Thomsen is International Air Transport Association (IATA’s) Chief Economist. During IATA’s 78th Annual General Meeting held in Doha, Qatar from June 20 to 21, Marie presented her Economic Outlook report to the assembly saying that the expected airline industry net loss of $9.7 billion this year is “a phenomenal result even if it’s still in the red,” given the historic challenges faced since 2020.
Marie has spent most of her 30-year professional life in various Chief Economist roles for both investment banks and private banks, including HSBC in London, Merrill Lynch in Paris, and Indosuez in Geneva. Outside of the financial sector, Marie worked for IKEA, and she also founded and managed her own company in the equine industry. As a macro economist, Marie seeks to promote a global economy that is prosperous, inclusive, and sustainable, and one in which the air transport sector can flourish and realize its full potential so as to deliver better economic outcomes for all. Capital caught up with her to talk about her report and the airline industry’s future. Excerpts;

Capital: Your report said it is a shocking bounce, why is that?
Marie Owens Thomsen: Well, in every way if we look at the traffic numbers they obviously basically went to zero during the COVID pandemic and that has happened momentarily in the past. For instance, the 9/11 situation was perceived very much as a US problem, not a global problem. But of course when that happened I don’t think the terrorists had even understood what would happen next which is that there was no insurance for airplanes all of a sudden and without insurance we cannot fly.
9/11 halted domestic traffic in the US and that was a really big crisis for the industry, but it was contained to the US. So the COVID-19 crisis has had this peculiarity that it has halted traffic, to varying degrees for sure, but nevertheless, pretty much globally, all of us together have been affected as a whole. Traffic just stopped and never has this transpired to such a huge degree. This has cost us about two years of business.
And as we’ve said, we now think that we will perhaps come back to 2019 level of activity by 2024, which I think is an impressive performance given the severity of the crisis. I hope that everybody will have learned that you cannot just halt economic activity and then think that you can turn it right back on like turning on the light in your house. Thus, although steady, we are on the bounce back track.

Capital: In your report, you said that insurance is mentioned as one of the challenges. How would you describe that?
Marie: Well, for instance, as mentioned 9/11 and the current insurance problem we have is very much related of course to the situation and to the war between Russia and Ukraine. That war has led approximately to 500 airplanes to be stranded in Russia, and those who own them cannot recuperate them.
So we haven’t even started dealing with this insurance problem and historically speaking we have never seen that situation ever before either and insurance companies have not planned for such a hit. They planned for something much smaller.
Therefore, the insurance premiums which have already been paid are insufficient for the insurance companies to face these potential claims, and premiums will have to go up.
I cannot see how anything else could ensue. Now, insurance costs are a small part of all aviation costs. But given that we are hoping to eke out a little bit of a profit the increased insurance costs could be something that prevents us from realizing that profit, hence the inclusion as a challenge.

Capital: Climate change costs and infrastructure costs are rising, this is going have a ripple effect on the Airlines, what are your thoughts on these?
Marie: Absolutely, not only airlines but also other significantly related sectors, in addition to Airlines too. For example the Bangladesh airport is being closed which is a testament of how real those costs are. And of course the industry is struggling to become profitable and with the global situation as the whole, challenges affect the whole of the value chain. I think that’s going to be a challenge on how we can find the money to improve the infrastructure in our whole value chain to such an extent that we can feel confident about the future.
I think there’s a great risk of many airlines airports being affected by climate change, and route disruptions also because of climate change. So the whole value chain is going to be impacted by those increased costs as well going forward. And that’s before we sort of start talking about how much it’s going to cost to go from fossil fuel to sustainable aviation fuel. But nevertheless, I think when you spread all of those costs out over the number of passengers and the horizon whether that’s 2030 or 2050 we as an industry have said that we want to be net zero by 2050. So when you spread the costs out over all our passengers and all those years, I still think that that’s really not the main issue.
The main issue, in my humble opinion, is to get people to coalesce around the same desire to actually make this happen. In a fair way, I would say this is not a Western problem, it is not a southern problem either, but it is indeed a collective one. And we have to find a way of distributing these costs in the best and fairest way possible. That’s really important.

Capital: You mentioned the high inflation rates and low interest rates will help the airline industry, how do you see that panning out?
Marie: So it’s true. This is something that we talk a lot about in economics, nominal or real. So nominal is the price you see and real is the price you see minus the rate of inflation.
For example, if we have 10% inflation daily today thus we pay the additional 10. And if its 11% the next time, we pay the 11 so our purchasing power is diminished because of inflation, which is bad. But the real value then of our debt is also diminished in exactly the same way.
If I have 10% inflation, on whatever horizon and I have borrowed 100, I will only pay back 90 in real terms. So high inflation, and as long as the nominal interest rate is reasonably low you’re actually paid for borrowing money in real terms, thus you still have to have enough nominal earnings. Because if you don’t have any cash, yet you’re going to be in trouble. But as long as you have sufficient cash it remains the case in today’s economy that borrowing is a good thing.
It’s savings that’s being penalized by the rate of inflation. If you got money in your bank account a year from now it’s going to be worth less because of the rate of inflation, but when you borrowed money, then that debt is also going to be smaller. So this is a borrower’s world, not the savers world.

Capital: What is your evaluation of African airlines?
Marie: Well, the situation is obviously complex. But if you look at throughout economic history, economic performance has been very strongly correlated with connectivity. So for millennia, we were all poor because we only had our legs and our horses and our camels to transport us.
And then we had a big improvement in economic performance when people started to build boats and start sailing. And then eventually, we had a big improvement thanks to railroads. And then if you look at the long term chart of GDP per capita you see how the pace increases with the pace of connectivity. So that then translated to global aviation in the Second World War.
So Africa is obviously a continent that struggles with connectivity. And the poorest countries in the world are in Africa, and many of them are landlocked countries, really struggling with connectivity. And I think that, this is a two way project, I would argue for Africa, that governments in Africa should try to promote aviation. And aviation should of course try to orient itself a bit more intra-Africa and I would love to see intra African trade flow increase. It’s a bit absurd to me that many African nations trade more with Europeans or Americans or Chinese than they do amongst themselves. That’s an outlier where in the world economy where everyone else trades more with their neighbors. Why is this not happening in Africa? I think these are issues that are holding the continent back. Otherwise, it’s obviously a fabulous continent with lots of resources. And if we improve connectivity in Africa it would not only benefit airlines obviously, but it could change the outcome for the people living in Africa.

Girma Beyene and Akale Wube

On the occasion of the celebration of the 125th anniversary of Ethiopia and French diplomatic relationship on June 20th Alliance Ethio-Française organized a concert with the legendary singer, composer and pianist Girma Beyene and Akale Wube Band at the Hager Fiker Theatre. The event attracted a lot of audience and Girma lived up to his expectation.
The French group Akale wube band revives the popular Ethiopian list of the 60s and 70s and transforming the songs into contemporary grooves.

On Trial-The Judiciary of the Republic

0

By Samuel Estefanous

So it is official, huh? The judiciary is a thick den of thieves guilty of the crime of theft worse than those committed by a band of high way robbers and brigands. What am I saying, though? How come the separate offences of corruption, dishonesty, breach of trust, theft, brigandage all are lumped together in to one act of crime?
In the time honored and highly esteemed profession of practicing law, they say, not just a word but a missed coma could save a life or could wrongly condemn an innocent person to death. You know the verdict awarded to Shylock to carve out a pound of flesh from the chest of old Antonio without spilling a drop of blood. You see, the existing law didn’t expressly outlaw the high contracting parties from agreeing on a punitive damage that could possibly result in ‘carving out ‘the flesh of a human being but it did forbid ‘spilling the blood’ of a Christian by a Jew.
There you go, Shylock was told by the magistrate, words are indeed bonds and contracts between among the signatories are laws-as our folks here love to misquote-take your goddamn pound of flesh but beware without spilling a drop of blood.
You see, the domain of the law isn’t fit for the uninitiated. One doesn’t delve in to it carried away by the currents of popular discontent. You chose your words painstakingly and you take measured steps every inch of the way. All the same, the Premier is not supposed or expected to know the legislative ramifications relative to the meaning, definition and consequences of those different offences. But he is being advised by a team of highly qualified lawyers, isn’t he? How come they are being re-educated to ignore their knowledge and trade? How could they lack the gut to tell the Premier without beating about the bush that corruption is not theft; it is worse than theft but it is not theft? Some of them are actually repeating after him in their pathetic effort to buy in to his good grace. Honest to God he doesn’t need that.
Among other factors perhaps that is the reason the Premier artlessly condemned the entire judiciary and law enforcement organs indiscriminately. From the reactions of folks I know, family and friends, I can fairly conclude that a considerable segment of the society did like his ‘calling a spade a spade’. I mean what he said was absolutely ground shaking and taboo breaking bold statement- particularly the one relative to the state of the judiciary in Ethiopia.
He didn’t say the judiciary tops the list of organized crimes in the country in a private dialogue secretly taped and smuggled out to the media, nah! Not even in an impromptu press briefing moment after cleverly cornered, maneuvered and manipulated by a veteran journalist. He didn’t say that in a memo slipped to his Minister of Justice. Not Dr.Abiy! The maverick of modern Ethiopian politics cut loose from the bottomless culture of wily hollow finesse.
He declared that in a solemn address to the House of People’s Representatives of the FDRE in particular and the Ethiopian public and the world in general. Whatever your measure of the Premier is, it takes some raw gut to say what he had said.
What possible inferences can we possibly draw from the statement of the Premier?
It isn’t a simple inconsequential off the cuff statement.
I assume that the Premier gets periodic reports to the effect that the judiciary and law enforcements agencies are corroding the bond of trust between the government and the public. It is true, lately the government in collaboration with development partners has mobilized unprecedented level of resources and has invested humongous amount of money to build the capacity of the agencies, to train and to secure multiple benefits to the personnel including but not limited to housing and mobility but to no meaningful avail. That partly explains the frustration of the Premier and Co.
Hence by the government’s own admission the greater number of judges, prosecutors and members of the police force are in one way or another unfit for office. The Premier took incredible chances to come forward with this solid fact and own his government’s weakness in this particular respect.

Who is to blame?
Honestly? The entire government structure beginning from the house of people’s representative who had allegedly appointed a band of thieves and let them loose on the unsuspecting public; the top echelon of folks at the helm of the ministry of justice who have recruited the alleged corrupt officers and prosecutors.
Unless proved to the contrary or the statement is retracted or rephrased, the plain suggestion by the government is simple- this isn’t an isolated instance of some corrupt officers and judges being busted on the act. This is an institutional failure and a phenomenal collapse of the justice administration system.

Resign or wait to be Purged
If you know how a government works, before the Prime Minister addressed the Ethiopian public and the world at large to declare the failure of these institutions, his team had worked day and night to take care of the problem by administrative and legal means. Obviously they couldn’t, hence the public admittance of failure.
But something doesn’t seem to make sense. You would expect the Prime Minister to admit the guilt of his administration after he had taken measures-firing, demoting, and in the worst case scenario prosecuting the wrong doers. In this instance it looks like the cart is placed before the horse.
May be not, may be he knows what he is doing. To my mind, he is sending a clear message to all concerned-tender your resignation!

The Reward of the Innocent
However few they are, I am sure the fate of the hard working, innocent and conscientious magistrates is going to weigh heavy on the conscience of the Premier. Of all the vices of governance nothing matches the tragedy of condemning the innocent for the fault of some evil doers by simple association.
The truly guilty party doesn’t really care that much. But I can imagine how the cruel words of the Premier come down on the head of the innocent, crushing like a ton of bricks. I mean these folks- particularly judges-work more than ten hours a day 24/7 without any particular benefit but when the reward comes in such form from the grand skipper himself the effect is devastating.
However much bleak the state of the justice administration is, It isn’t fair to summarily denounce judges as professional heirs of the chair of Nesibu Mesqele. Besides, there are some tangible good efforts and headways, the government shouldn’t undermine them.

Abused Trust
The most lasting, tremendous and most damaging consequences of the words of the Prime Minister is the effect it is going to bear on the general public relative to the said institutions.
I wouldn’t say the bond of trust is irreparably broken (since we are promised rectifying measures would be taken) but it is dealt a significant blow. As it is the collateral risk of the profession is to disappoint the other party in every single case he or she handles.
The losing party never says justice is served but grossly denied in broad day light while the government is sitting in its august chamber. But now that this fragile bond of trust is declared missing that even the winning party would be loath to take his case to law enforcement agencies or the judiciary. Thus, accessing justice is indirectly compromised.
At the very worst, I am afraid a general tendency to resist authority and a state of anarchy might ensue.

What is to be done?
Principally and implicitly, trust your magistrates but thoroughly investigate their property and wealth-registered or otherwise, in their names or otherwise. Always follow the hot trace of the ill-gotten wealth.
Secondly, the government should come forward with a solid explanation as to how it had recruited and appointed the ‘blood hounds’ in its own words and identify the broken link not to repeat the mistake again.
God Bless.

The writer could be reached at estefanoussamuel@yahoo.com