Wednesday, October 1, 2025
Home Blog Page 2429

The nexus between Global Security Initiative and Africa’s security needs

0

Melaku Mulualem K.

The Four Initiatives of President Xi Jinping
Starting from 2013 onwards President Xi Jinping took four major global initiatives. These are the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Community of Shared Future of Mankind, Global Development Initiatives (GDI) and Global Security Initiative (GSI). The fourth initiative has been taken on the Boao Forum on 21 April 2022 when the president made an opening remarks.
These four initiatives are the reflection of the foreign policy of China that underlines the promotion and cooperation of countries around the world. Similar with the foreign policy, GSI will follow “mutual respect, equality, mutual benefit and peaceful coexistence, follow a policy of good-neighborliness and friendship”. The four initiatives are complementary to one another. The president puts forward these initiatives to solve global problems through cooperation and partnership. All initiatives request the participation of least developed countries, developing countries, and developed countries. Developed countries are expected to support the initiatives in alleviating the critical problems of economically weak countries.
The four initiatives are open to all governments of the world to be part and parcel in solving global economic and security challenges. All of them focus on global peace, security and developments. They are moves of China from my national interests to international interests. These show that China is stepping forward from a national vision to a global vision as well as balancing national interests with international interests.
The Boao Forum
Broadly speaking there are three types of security i.e international or global security, state security and human security. They are inseparable to one another. Global security focuses on ending global problems. In the annual Boao Forum for Asia President Xi Jinping clarified the concept and importance of the Global Security Initiative. He has underlined that security and development are intermingled to one another. The impact on one will be reflected on the other.
According to the Global Security Initiative, there are six commitments. These are:
The vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, and work together to maintain world peace and security;
Respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries, uphold non-interference in internal affairs, and respect the independent choices of development paths and social systems made by people in different countries;
Abiding by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, reject the Cold War mentality, oppose unilateralism, and say no to group politics and bloc confrontation;
Taking the legitimate security concerns of all countries seriously, uphold the principle of indivisible security, build a balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture, and oppose the pursuit of one’s own security at the cost of others’ security;
Peacefully resolving differences and disputes between countries through dialogue and consultation, support all efforts conducive to the peaceful settlement of crises, reject double standards, and oppose the wanton use of unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction;
Maintaining security in both traditional and non-traditional domains, and work together on regional disputes and global challenges such as terrorism, climate change, cybersecurity and biosecurity.
The Global Security Initiative is expected to solve global challenges including the Covid 19 pandemics, poverty, climate change, cyber, terrorism and security. He has also identified drivers of the security challenges namely Cold War mentality, unilateralism, hegemonism, double standards, power politics through group politics and bloc confrontation. To counter these challenges, there is a need to organize global cooperation, and partnership, and promote multilateralism. The main objective of GSI is to provide a solution to the above-listed global problems and to make this world safe and secure.
President Xi also forwarded a promise to help Asian and African countries saying “China will follow through the pledged donation of 600 million and 150 million doses of vaccines to Africa and ASEAN countries respectively, as part of our effort to close the immunization gap”. This support will help the people of Africa and Asia to control the pandemics and move forward with development.
Global Security Initiative and Africa
Most of the United Nations Peace Keeping Missions are located in Africa. This shows that Africa has grave security challenge. From the initiative of President Xi Jinping Africa will benefit the most. To maintain global security there is a need to have highly sophisticated technology in harvesting information and neutralizing grave security challenges. Most African countries do not have that technology and facilities. Thus Global Security Initiative is the most welcoming idea to be embraced by Africa.
Of Course China has sent her troops through the United Nations Peace Keeping Missions to Africa. This is one indication that China needs peaceful Africa. In addition to this recently China has appointed an envoy to the Horn of Africa to support peace and security in the region. The Global Security Initiative will make the support of China to Africa holistic and cover wider areas in the continent.
Taking initiative doesn’t mean shouldering all responsibilities. This means that other countries should also play their role to make this world safe and sound. Especially developed countries should support such initiatives so that poor countries can get out of security challenges.
Since the emergence of the Covid pandemic, the problem in Africa is increasing by leaps and bounds. Health and security are highly related to one another. African governments could not provide enough health facilities to counter the pandemic, as a result of it people are dying, the number of unemployed people has increased very fast, poverty and hunger are escalating, donor communities have minimized their support and shortage of hard currency impacted the foreign trade and the like.
African people are highly affected by Covid 19 and its related consequences. This global pandemic can be solved through global partnership. As long as China is willing to support countries in controlling the spread of the virus, Africa should promote and use the opportunities with great enthusiasm. Supporting GSI means supporting and implementing the fifty years plan of the African Union.
The Nexus between GSI and Agenda 2063
GSI is highly related to the Agenda 2063 of the African Union strategic framework. The fourth aspiration of the African Union says “A Peaceful and Secure Africa”. Both GSI and Agenda 2063 also promote partnership in solving common problems of governments. For instance number nineteen goal of the African Union states that the continent would continue as “a major partner in global affairs and peaceful co-existence”. This shows that to solve the problem of Africa there is a need to establish a partnership with other countries to execute its fifty-year plan effectively and efficiently.
The Way Forward
In order to implement GSI there is a need to promote the initiative through international media, various forum, put structures and modalities, synchronizing security policies of various governments to the same purpose, securing fund, making synergy with the security works of the United Nations as well as other continental and regional blocs and the like. China and Africa can strengthen their partnership and cooperation at various levels. The Africa Union has its own peace and security structure that works on conflict prevention management and resolution as well as combating terrorism and the like.
In a nutshell, China has introduced various global initiatives to solve problems of the world through cooperation and partnership. Supporting and implementing the initiative can make all beneficiaries. Especially African countries can use these great initiatives as an opportunity to solve both their internal and external challenges. African countries should welcome GSI with open arms. GSI helps maintaining security in the world to be conducted in a coordinated manner. It also synergizes the security strategies of various governments in the world.

Melaku Mulualem K. is a researcher in the Foreign Relations Institute. You can reach him via melakumulu@yahoo.com

Disagreement about the course threatens Africa Museum

The ground floor and the first floor of the Africa Museum could hardly be more different. The ground floor is bathed in light. White walls contrast with the bright colors of art objects and the moving image on various screens. “This is going to be a different atmosphere,” says director Wayne Modest as he climbs the stairs. There is carpet on the first floor. The space is dark, lit showcases show statues, masks and spears with spiritual meaning.
Modest, professor by special appointment at the Free University in Amsterdam and publicist in the field of postcolonial studies, is ‘substantive director’ of the National Museum of World Cultures (NMVW). The Afrika Museum has been there since the merger in 2014 with the Tropenmuseum (Amsterdam) and Museum of Ethnology (Leiden) part of. Downstairs, Modest points to his favorite works: a wall by the painter Tshibumba Kanda-Matulu, about Congolese history and decolonization. And further on: photographic studies in black and white of exuberant dancing people in Mali in the 1960s, by the photographer Malick Sidibé. “This is also a story that we as the Africa Museum have to tell. About new hope among the population after the independence movement.”
Mission and merger
The Africa Museum was founded in 1954 by the Fathers of the Holy Spirit – a missionary congregation. The fathers are still the owners of the buildings, the grounds and (part of) the collection. But they disagree with the course of the National Museum of World Cultures. The ground floor of the museum reflects the new course, the first floor the old one. The fathers have since canceled their collaboration with the Museum of World Cultures. The NMVW must leave the building on 1 January 2025. As it stands, that means the end for a museum that has been iconic in the region for decades.
The collection of the Africa Museum is rooted in the missionary missions of the fathers to African countries such as Nigeria, Congo, Togo, Benin, Kenya and Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, the Swahili region and Madagascar. There they experienced the local art and culture. The museum was intended to also introduce the Dutch public to this. The collection consists of 8000 pieces. “Everything was bought or received fairly,” says Carel Verdonschot, economic adviser to the fathers. But ‘bought and received’ is difficult to control in a colonial context; this requires in-depth research. In 2020, African activists took another statue from the museum as a protest against looted art.
At the merger in 2014 a condition for retaining the subsidy the NMVW became a tenant: the museum would be redecorated “with the collection on loan”, according to Verdonschot. The museum thus embarked on a modernization and decolonization of the contents. “Around that time, ethnological museums, also in the rest of Europe, had been thinking for some time about what and how they exhibited,” says director Wayne Modest.
“In fact, a discussion arose about whether these kinds of museums should exist at all, in line with the broader scientific and art-historical discussion about decolonization.” He points around the dark space of the first floor, quite literally a representation of ‘dark Africa’. “European museums devoted to African art need to think very critically about how they are exhibited.”
residential areas
The agreement was that the Africa Museum would retain its authenticity, says Carel Verdonschot. It is not the modernization initiated by the NMVW that is a problem for the fathers. “Our main concern is that the museum, as it is currently managed, is not concerned with exhibiting our collection in the best possible way. The NMVW has had eight years to renovate the top floor. That didn’t happen.”
According to him, the collection is handled carelessly, and more and more pieces are said to disappear in a depot.
When the NMVW indicated in 2020 that it wanted to change both the name ‘Africa Museum’ and the outdoor museum, “the switch turned,” says Verdonschot.
The outdoor museum around the museum building consists of typical residential areas, such as you find in the countryside of some African countries. “That is also Africa,” says Verdonschot. Those yards with cottages are now the first thing visitors see when they arrive. The NMVW wants to get rid of that. Director Modest: “We are not saying that Africa is only urban, but only that rural presentation is incomplete.”
Despite requests, Modest has only had one interview with the fathers so far. The fathers say that their requests for further consultation failed. “I think we essentially think the same about a lot,” Modest says. Both parties say they consider modernization necessary. But there are differences of opinion and misunderstandings about how to shape that process. Modest: “We certainly wanted to keep doing something with the collection, especially in our other museums, so that the pieces can also be viewed in Amsterdam or Leiden.”
Future
What will happen to the museum from 2025? That also depends on who owns the collection. According to the NMVW, half of the pieces, about four thousand, have been transferred by the fathers: they are now part of the National Art Collection. “That is incorrect,” said Verdonschot. “I’m trying to avoid a lawsuit, but the chances are high.”
A plan by the fathers for their version of a restart of the museum has been rejected by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. The fathers cannot maintain the museum without a subsidy. They are now looking for other financiers, otherwise they will have to house the collection elsewhere. “There are already interested museums abroad,” says Verdonschot.
Wayne Modest hopes to use the remaining two and a half years “to find each other after all.” The NMVW wants to stay in the region and look for another location. “We hope that we can continue to work together with the fathers in the future. That’s better than a bad divorce.”

Ethiopian Yalemzaf set fastest ever women’s marathon debut time

0

Ethiopia’s Yalemzerf Yehualaw made history in Hamburg running 2:17:23 for the fastest ever women’s marathon debut.
The 22-year-old won the Haspa Marathon Hamburg by almost nine minutes, breaking the Ethiopian record and German all-comers’ record, while just a second separated the top two in the men’s race. Kenya’s Cybrian Kotut clocked 2:04:47 to pip Uganda’s Stephen Kissa as the top four were all under the previous men’s course record of 2:05:30 set by Eliud Kipchoge in 2013.
Having broken the world 10km record with 29:14 in Castellon in February and with a half marathon best of 1:03:51 to her name, Yehualaw’s marathon debut was highly anticipated and she delivered in fine style.
Fast from the start, she ran with her male pacemakers through 10km in 32:39 and was on exactly 2:17 marathon pace through half way (1:08:30). Slowing only marginally in the second half, she went through 30km in 1:37:34 before running solo through 35km in 1:53:55 once her pacemakers had done their job.
The world half marathon bronze medallist continued on to eventually reach the finish line with 2:17:23 on the clock, well under the previous fastest ever women’s marathon debut time of 2:18:56 achieved by Paula Radcliffe in 2002.
The performance puts Yehualaw sixth on the women’s world marathon all-time list, topped by Brigid Kosgei’s world record of 2:14:04 set in 2019, and is the third-fastest time of the year so far.
She led an Ethiopian top three, with Fikrte Wereta and Bone Cheluke clocking respective times of 2:26:15 and 2:26:23, also on their marathon debuts.
“The race went well for me, considering this was my first marathon,” said Yehualaw. “The fast Hamburg course suited me and the spectators helped me a lot.”

East Africa looking to bloom in time for World Cup

0

The main focus of African football will be on the vital home-and-away ties that will seal World Cup qualification. Preliminary qualifiers for the 2023 African Nations Cup will unsurprisingly go under the radar. But for CECAFA and others, the first step towards the African Nations Cup will be vital. And East Africa CECAFA sent only two representatives to the African Nations Cup.
Four CECAFA members will play in the March two-legged ties, a third of the entire confederation. Success in the preliminary matches will be vital to boosting East Africa’s chances at securing a bid.
Although there will be no East African representatives in the Qatar-hosted World Cup, federations can look forward to youth competitions. Bolstering the club sides competing in continent-wide competitions is also a must.
Even though the African Nations Cup may have been disappointing for CECAFA, the seeds of East African football are still ready to be planted. They will bloom soon with time, care, and the right amount of patience. If East Africa has all of those, you could see players like Wanyama and Kenyan legend and retired Inter player McDonald Mariga join European teams.