Friday, October 30, 2026
Home Blog Page 2684

The impact of the Ethiopian coffee ceremony on society through artwork

0

I was at Laphto Mall Art Gallery last weekend. It was in the afternoon, around 3 p.m. The gallery was almost empty with only very few visitors coming in and out every now and then. Despite the noise of visiting children, the gallery was spacious and therefore convenient enough to move around and calmly view all the works on display. Unfortunately, there was no one at the gallery to guide visitors who came to see the works of art, except for a lady who was there to sell and guard the works on display. Overall, more than 30 works of art, mostly abstract art by artist Nuru Abegaz, were exhibited. Once I was lucky enough to see the work of the same artist at the Hyatt Regency and some of his old arts were again exhibited at the Laphto Mall Art Gallery. All the artworks were meaningful, giving important lessons about life. African body figures of nude women and men, life experiences of couples and families, abstract art of Ethiopian politics, the roles and impact of our different senses, the different meanings of nature and their interpretations in real life, attractive African faces with colorful designs and deepening interpretations among other works of art were part of the exhibits. I spent more than an hour at the gallery wondering about the different interpretations and meanings that the arts can have to offer to the public. As an amateur art visitor, it was not at all easy to grasp the meaning that the artist sought to demonstrate at first sight. Although the exercise of researching the direct and indirect meanings of the works took time and required in-depth reflection, it was at the same time very pleasant and relaxing. The exercise really helped me develop my skills to think outside the box, which I really appreciated.
Before leaving the gallery, I bought a small book on the recent work of women artists in Ethiopia. The book featured more than 20 female artists, professional and amateur, mostly Ethiopian as well as a few visiting artists who had stayed in the country. The book presented general information about the artists, how they started the artwork and the type of artworks they make, such as visual art, sculpture, abstract, etc. Of all the artists featured, I was mostly attracted by the work of a female artist who graduated from Addis Ababa University School of Fine Arts. The artist has used the well-known Ethiopian coffee ceremony in her work. The painting was colorful, showing all the utensils used to make traditional Ethiopian coffee such as traditional small cups, a “Jebena“ coffee maker, a traditional charcoal stove, etc. Additionally, the work featured two young women of almost the same age who were well dressed in traditional clothing and afro styled hair, sitting close together and having a chat over coffee. They both seemed to be having a good time and enjoying the drink with cups of coffee in their hands. Honestly, it wasn’t the coffee ceremony nor the painting of the two ladies that caught my attention. I rather became more drawn to the meaning the artist was seeking to reveal.
The artwork examined the hidden role and positive impact of the Ethiopian coffee ceremony on our society. Apart from enjoying the flavor and taste of coffee, coffee ceremony allows people to interact with each other and socialize. The experience is that people, including children, gather around a coffee ceremony, chatting and conversing with each other. They spend time together where they share and debate ideas and thus learn lessons, feedback and solutions to problems they may have in mind. The Ethiopian coffee ceremony has a major social impact by alleviating social problems as well as mental pressures. This gives the opportunity for those who gather over coffee to have stronger links and collaborations with each other. Conversations around a coffee ceremony are various ranging from family, neighborhood and friendship experiences and issues as well as professional experiences and challenges, including friendly discussions on various topics leading to a debate as well as to an agreement based on antagonistic and similar ideologies with fascinating experience sharing. Most people enjoy the moments they spend at a coffee ceremony with laughter and ease leaving good memories and a pleasant time.
After all, I admire the efforts made by Laphto Mall and other art galleries to promote the good work of artists in Ethiopia. It provides an opportunity to encourage works of art that seek to demonstrate Ethiopian culture, values and ethics. Also, Ethiopian artworks give different meanings including hidden meaning to the values and culture of Ethiopia by introducing the country to the general public inside and outside of Ethiopia. Subsequently, there is a need to promote artworks in Ethiopia by increasing the number of fascinating artists as well as art galleries.

The writer can be reached via tgstsolomon@gmail.com

It Is Now Time for the West to Return African Art

0

Much of priceless African art still lies in Western museums, especially in Europe. The arguments against returning them increasingly sound bogus. The West must start returning African art to Africa.

No one can deny the effective soft power of ancient art. Centuries’-old artifacts will be researched, analyzed in books, documented in films and admired by private collectors, museums and populations across different cultures and time. Soft power the ability to seduce rather than coerce brings profits in tourism, diplomacy and politics. It shapes the preferences of civilizations regarding values and morals. Art and entertainment are two of its most efficient tools.
Africa, the birthplace of mankind, is home to millions of ancient artifacts admired by the whole planet and coveted by museums and private collectors all around the world. But Africa itself rarely profits from the source of its own soft power. For centuries, its art has been stolen and sold abroad, leaving African museums and galleries with very few sometimes none of the essential elements of soft power to seduce other nations.
However, a growing movement is reversing centuries-long,steady, outward flow of ancient African art towards other horizons. Last January, an ancient wooden sarcophagus, displayed at the Houston Museum of Natural Science, was returned to Egypt after US specialists determined it had been looted years ago. This is just one of the 5300 stolen artifacts that were retuned to Cairo since 2021. A “Head of a King” or “Oba” dated from 1700 was part of the Rhode Island School of Design Museum collection for more than 70 years and it was returned to Nigeria, along with 31 other cultural artifacts. Also in the US, the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African Art returned 29 Benin bronzes to Nigeria in late October, stolen in a British raid in 1897.
Last November, the Horniman Museum in London returned six artifacts looted by British troops 125 years ago from a place in Benin, now Nigeria. Of these six, two were 16th century bronze plaques ransacked from the royal palace in 1897, when British forces sacked and burned the kingdom. The return put pressure on the British Museum to return over 900 objects, the largest collection of ancient African art in the world. The British Museum argues that the British Museum Act of 1963 and the Heritage Act of 1983 prevent it from returning the artifacts .
In contrast, Germany signed an agreement with Nigeria in 2022 to return 1,100 metal plaques and sculptures from the royal palace of the Kingdom of Benin, mostly taken by British forces and sold to 20 museums around Germany. The country will also return a female figure known as Ngonnso to the kingdom of Nso, in northwestern Cameroon. A colonial officer took it and donated it to Berlin’s Ethnological Museum in 1903. The figure’s presence in Berlin provoked a civic initiative called “Bring Back Ngonnso,” with locals claiming that they have suffered multiple misfortunes since the statue was brought to their city.
The Fight For Ownership of African Art
Do national laws prevent countries from returning artifacts to their homeland? Probably not. Tourists and international communities are increasingly rejecting the idea that museums in developed countries should still be allowed to profit from other peoples’ and other nations’ ancient art. In fact, the longer those museums keep these artifacts, the less they become attractive as a soft power tool. Instead of seducing visitors, they may even drive them away.
Some accounts say that over half a million cultural artifacts originated in Africa are located in Europe. Countries like Belgium must now review all colonial-era acquisitions from the Democratic Republic of Congo. But as Bénédicte Savoy argues in her book, Africa’s Struggle for Its Art: History of a Postcolonial Defeat, the movement began in the 1960s, when many African nations declared independence. It faded in the 1980s when European museums ignored these demands. Appeals by the likes of Ahmadou-Mahtar M’Bow, the then director-general of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), had no effect. In 1978, the UNESCO boss said that “everything which has been taken away (…) bore witness to a history of a culture and of a nation whose spirit they perpetuated and renewed.”
The resistance to the return of ancient art to Africa may cause damage beyond the walls of European museums. In her book, Savoy reminds readers that some European countries were receptive to the idea of restitution during the Cold War. They wanted to use both hard power and soft power to improve relations with African countries. Returning art was a good way to increase the latter.
In the 21st century, those efforts may be needed more than ever. Europe and the US have been trying to strengthen commercial and political ties with Africa in an effort to counter the increasing influence of China. In 2019, French President Emmanuel Macron announced the return of 26 pieces, including sculptures and other artifacts, to the Republic of Benin. This West African nation had formerly been a colony of France. Later, the French press argued that this gesture may not be enough. It expressed the current public opinion that France should return other artifacts to Africa, including priceless antiques from venerated museums like the Louvre.
Art Coming Home
Are there any arguments that justify European museums not returning Africa’s ancient art? One argument maintains that this would lead to a loss of cultural heritage. Museums would have poorer collections, making it more difficult for people to get cultural exposure and education. Another argument holds that European museums are safer places for ancient artifacts than unstable African countries. Many of these countries do not have proper storage conditions for artifacts. Many Africans find this argument ridiculous. Nigerian art historian, Chika Okeke-Agulu said that it reminds him of a “thief demanding the construction of a secure facility before returning a stolen BMW.”
The arguments for returning ancient African art are not just rhetorical. First, new museums have been constructed in Africa. They highlight the African drive to bring their artifacts home. These African nations also want to increase their soft power, attract more tourists and earn revenues. After a series of delays, Egypt will finally inaugurate the Grand Egyptian Museum in Cairo. This museum will cover 50 hectares and house over 100,000 objects, including artifacts from Tutankhamun’s tomb.
Second, returned artifacts increase a nation’s self-esteem. When France returned the Dahomey statues to Benin, a parade attracted thousands to see the sculptures at a free exhibition installed at the presidential palace in Cotonou. These celebrations and the display of cultural artifacts in the land of their origins boost national pride, identity and confidence.
Finally and importantly, returned artifacts stimulate investment in a nation’s cultural life. Benin City in Nigeria is building a new museum complex to display the repatriated art from the West. The museum’s promoters hope that this new museum will make Benin City a global destination. New hotels and businesses to serve tourists will create jobs and stimulate the local economy.
If this movement continues, we may see priceless works of art return home. The Nefertiti Bust (1345 BC) in Neues Museum in Berlin, the Rosetta Stone (196 BC) in the British Museum and many others might soon return to Africa. Of course, there is a chance this might never happen. We can’t know the future yet. However, the time for Africa’s ancient art to return to its homeland, increase the continent’s soft power and stimulate its economy has arrived.

Winners of the Responsible Tourism Awards 2023 announced at WTM Africa

0

WTM Africa 2023 celebrated the champions of Responsible Tourism on the African continent on 4 April 2023 by announcing the winners of the WTM Africa Responsible Tourism Awards 2023.
These annual awards highlight and promote the very best practices in sustainability and responsibility in the tourism industry. The aim is to promote good practice and showcase pioneering projects that focus on the wellbeing and sustainability of tourism, while also caring for the people and landscapes that make the industry thrive.
The winners of the WTM Africa Responsible Tourism Awards 2023 are:

Best for Addressing Climate Change:

Gold, Tourism Authority Mauritius
Gold, Weeva

Best for Diversity and Inclusion:

Gold, BirdLife South Africa
Silver, Liveable

Best for Local Sourcing, Craft and Food:

Gold, Ngwenya Glass
Gold, Tourism Authority Mauritius
Silver, Artisans Co Ltd

Best for Meaningful Connections:

Gold, uThando South Africa
Silver, Happy Soul Adventures

Best for Nature-Positive Tourism:

Gold, Wildlife ACT
Silver, BirdLife South Africa
One to watch: Cape Vulture Lodge

Best for Tackling Plastic Waste.

Gold, Lemala Camps & Lodges

Free to enter, the 2023 Awards are split into four regions, with the winner of each region going forward to compete in the Global Awards.
Megan Oberholzer RX Africa Portfolio Director Travel, Tourism & Marketing said:
“Congratulations to all the winners of the WTM Responsible Tourism Africa Awards. Your passion, commitment, and innovative approach towards tackling sustainability is truly inspiring. WTM is thrilled to recognise and celebrate your efforts towards creating a positive impact on the environment, local communities, and the tourism industry as a whole.
“It’s remarkable to see how small changes can have such a big impact. From eco-friendly accommodations to community-based tourism initiatives, each winner has shown that sustainability is not only achievable but also profitable. Your success stories are a testament to the fact that responsible tourism is the way forward.
“We wish all the winners the very best at the global awards and hope that your accomplishments will inspire others to follow in your footsteps. Let’s continue to work towards making the tourism industry more responsible and sustainable, one step at a time.”

The Political Economy of Debt Relief

0

In certain circumstances, common morality says that creditors should not force their borrowers to pay interest and principal fully and on time. The COVID 19 pandemic and the global economic collapse it has caused are just such circumstances, for both persons and governments. For the poorest countries harmed by the crisis (e.g., Guinea, Haiti, Nepal), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has developed a mechanism to free governments from debt servicing payments to the IMF. The principle is right, but the country coverage is far too limited and the period of relief too short.
Barry Herman, Senior Fellow in the Graduate Program in International Affairs at The New School in New York City stated that the IMF is trying to mobilize funds from donor governments to extend its debt relief program although they themselves have huge crisis-related domestic spending needs. However, donor governments do not have to fund poor country debt relief from their fiscal budgets. There is another resource available. hey can tap long-unused reserve assets available at the Fund called “Special Drawing Rights” (SDRs). Not only can Special Drawing Rights fund relief from debt owed to the IMF, they can also fund relief from debt due to the World Bank and the major regional development banks. Here is how it could be done:
According to Barry Herman, in 2015, in the wake of the Ebola crisis, the IMF created the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT). The Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust is designed to pay the interest and principal due on debt owed to the IMF by low-income and vulnerable countries hit by catastrophes, freeing up government resources for more urgent uses. To receive the benefit, a government requests assistance from the IMF Executive Board. If the Board approves, the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust pays the Fund on behalf of the indebted government. Interest and principal payments continue to be made, just not by the debtor country. Moreover, unpaid debt servicing is not postponed and added to debt-servicing payments due in the future. It is cancelled.
Using Special Drawing Rights to fund IMF special programs for low-income countries was suggested by United States Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in April 2020. The important point is that Special Drawing Rights have real value, mostly unused by the richest countries who have most of them. When governments use Special Drawing Rights, it is usually to cover shortfalls in external payments due. However, they must first exchange the Special Drawing Rights for dollars or euros or another freely usable currency. Countries with large reserves simply draw on their foreign exchange holdings.
Barry Herman noted that the countries that the IMF classifies as “advanced” held 126 billion Special Drawing Rights in their reserves at the end of 2019, valued at about $177 billion. Special Drawing Rights could be tapped for the pending enlargement of the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust to $1.4 billion to provide two years of relief instead of six months, as currently. The Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust could well be further expanded to fund comparable relief for middle-income countries hit by the pandemic, such as Ecuador and Pakistan, or hurt by other disasters, natural or otherwise.
Holger Schmieding, Chief Economist at Berenberg Bank in London stated that the World Bank and regional development banks have no facility comparable to the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust, but nothing prevents their governing bodies from creating them. Moreover, they are all “prescribed holders” of Special Drawing Rights, meaning that governments can transfer Special Drawing Rights to them. Unlike the IMF, development banks need to exchange the Special Drawing Rights deposited in their trust funds into the currencies of their loans. This would be straightforward as the trust would sell Special Drawing Rights to the country whose currency it needed, e.g., to the United States Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund.
Then, each development bank would pursue its policies on which countries to help and to what extent. The World Bank President David Malpass, reacting to debt-relief proposals from the Group of 20, expressed his fear that any change to normal debt servicing would negatively impact the Bank’s standing in financial markets, where it issues bonds that finance its loans to middle-income countries. But if the World Bank emulated the IMF’s Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust, it would ensure uninterrupted debt servicing while providing relief to countries in crisis. Investors in the Bank’s bonds would appreciate that distinction.
According to Holger Schmieding, it is not clear why these proposals have not already been taken up. Perhaps the problem is that Special Drawing Rights are thought about, if they are thought about at all, by monetary authorities rather than by development cooperation ministries. Or perhaps it is inertia. Many governments and the IMF Managing Director support a global increase in Special Drawing Rights which is fully warranted, but will take time.
As Barry Herman noted, a substantial increase in multilateral relief can be organized now, with existing Special Drawing Rights. It is not a lot of money, but the relief it would provide and the distress it would offset is incalculable. For the G20 finance ministers, it is time for them to act.