Sunday, October 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 3080

Sovereigns of the Africa’s Skies are Dying: The Unfolding Vulture Crisis

0

By Samuel Bakari

In this age of biodiversity crises, history has showed us that humans are the architects of our own undoing. As we lurch from one predicament to another, from climate change, pollution, pandemics such as COVID-19, never has the impact of human activities on nature been clearer as it is now. Nature is on a dangerous decline, one million animal and plant species are in danger of extinction, a decline that can be exemplified by the case of Africa’s vultures.
As the world marks International Vulture Awareness Day (IVAD) today, a less oft highlighted decline, perhaps Africa’s best-kept biodiversity loss secret is the catastrophic decline of the continent’s vulture populations over the last 50 years. With declines of up to 97 % in some areas, African vultures are faced with the same predicament as the dodo 400 years ago – extinction. In some African folklore, a vulture is an ominous bird, signifying bad tidings, or even death however; these perceptions are dwarfed by the important role that vultures play in our ecosystems. These birds act as nature’s clean-up crew, removing rotten carcasses from our environment thanks to their unique and unprecedented scavenging capabilities. It is estimated that a single vulture may be worth as much as $11,000 for these clean-up services alone.
Nature abhors a vacuum and the deficit of these important scavengers in the ecosystem, destabilizes the ecological equilibrium, which can have serious social and economic impacts. This was highlighted in the 1990’s when vulture populations in Asia crashed by up to 99% as a result of feeding on cattle carcases containing diclofenac – an anti-inflammatory veterinary drug (NSAID) used to treat livestock, which is highly toxic to vultures. A 2008 study conducted on the human and economic consequences of the Asian vulture crash in India indicates that in the absence of vultures, populations of other undesirable scavengers such as rats and feral dogs could significantly increase, which in turn increased the potential for disease transmission from carcasses and between animals and humans. Indeed, cases of human rabies in India increased, parallel to the vulture declines.
A Convergence of Threats
Poisoning is the biggest threat to vultures across Africa. It accounts for more than 60% of reported vulture mortality and is widespread on the continent. Poisoning comes in two forms – intentional poisoning whereby poachers deliberately kill vultures that signal their illegal activities and unintentional poisoning, whereby vultures fall victim to retaliatory poisoning by livestock owners trying to kill predators preying on their livestock. Conflict between local communities and wildlife, driven by increased human population and weak wildlife legislations is taking a toll on the continent’s vulture populations.
Poaching continues elevating the threat of intentional poisoning of vultures as poachers seek to carry out their illegal activities undetected. In 2019, more than 530 Critically Endangered vultures of five different species died from feeding on two poisoned elephant carcasses in northern Botswana. Additionally, vultures are hunted for traditional beliefs, with their parts used for making charms or traditional medicine. In some communities on the continent particularly in West Africa, it is believed that vultures’ heads contain mystic powers, consequently vulture body parts are often highly sought after, driving them further toward the brink of extinction. In an incident which has been dubbed as the world’s most catastrophic incident of mass vulture poisoning and likely the largest killing of any Critically Endangered bird species, more than 2,000 Critically Endangered Hooded vultures are reported to have died in Guinea-Bissau since late 2019 underlining the precarious situation that these birds find themselves in.
A Wake Up Call
While we contemplate a world without vultures, the onus is on African states to halt their decline. Because of monumental multi-partner efforts, the wheel does not have to be reinvented thanks to the development and adoption of the CMS Vulture Multi-species Action Plan to Conserve African-Eurasian Vultures (Vulture MsAP), adopted by the Convention of Migratory Species (CMS) Parties in 2017, which aims to reverse vulture declines through multiple cross-cutting interventions across vulture range states.
Innovative solutions heralding a bottom-up approach are needed at the heart of this approach, is engaging local communities in conservation efforts. The need to raise awareness on the importance of vultures is critical. Addressing human-wildlife conflict at a community level, enacting and enforcing stronger wildlife laws that protect vultures, including strict regulation of pesticides used for vulture poisoning and taking actions to stop the illegal trade of vulture parts is imperative. Establishing Vulture Safe Zones (VSZ) across the continent that act as safe havens for vultures, free of key threats such as contaminated food, poisoning and habitat disturbance are also innovative ways in which BirdLife alongside other partners, are striving to halt vulture declines. There is a real need for cooperation and concerted action at a continental level, drawing together all 55 African Union (AU) member states. No effort should be spared to stop the loss of Sovereigns of the Africa’s skies.

The writer is vulture conservation officer at BirdLife International and can be reached via Samuel.bakari@birdlife.org

The political economy of the United Arab Emirates -Israel agreement

Its History book well recorded that fact that since its creation as a Jewish state in 1948, Israel has been isolated from nearly every other country in the predominantly Muslim Middle East. While Egypt and Jordan made peace with it, other Arab countries have said they would withhold recognition pending formation of a separate Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, territories Israel conquered in the 1967 war. Prospects for a Palestinian state have faded in recent years. Still, the United Arab Emirates, a Persian Gulf monarchy, has agreed to establish normal ties. This diplomatic move by United Arab Emirates highly commended by its Western allies.
David Wainer of Bloomberg recently wrote that although trade between Israel and its neighbors Jordan and Egypt never boomed despite normalization, it’s expected to be different with the United Arab Emirates, a federation of seven emirates. Unlike Jordan and Egypt, the United Arab Emirates never fought in any of the six Arab-Israeli wars. Plus Dubai is a business hub for the region and Abu Dhabi is keen to lessen its dependence on hydrocarbons.
David Wainer noted that as soon as the normalization deal was revealed on 13 August 2020, Ministers from the United Arab Emirates and Israel rushed to open phone lines and unblock internet access, while companies in the two countries announced new pacts. In addition, the accord puts Israel’s plan to annex parts of the West Bank on ice, though there are different interpretations of how long the freeze will last, and solidifies a growing alliance between Israel and some Arab countries with Sunni Muslim majorities to contain Iran, whose population is mostly Shiite Muslim.
Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Zayed pointed to Israel’s agreement to halt its annexation plan as a key factor behind normalization. Analysts argue that mutual distrust of Iran, especially its regional ambitions and nuclear program, were the more decisive catalyst. The United Arab Emirates shares Israel’s interest in pushing back against a strain of political Islam that the Gulf monarchy views as a threat to hereditary rule and a destabilizing influence primarily emanating from Iran, Qatar and Turkey. While not specifically spelled out in the so-called “Abraham Accord,” enhanced security cooperation against regional threats, especially from Iran and the network of foreign militias it supports, is a key driver of the deal, according to Steven Cook, senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
James Dorsey, Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Stated that the agreement to establish diplomatic relations between the United Arab Emirates and Israel is only the latest event that drives nails into the coffin of the notion that there is solidarity in the Arab and Islamic world. The presumption has long been that these nations share common geopolitical interests on the basis of ethnicity or religion and embrace kinship solidarity. Beyond the United Arab Emirates-Israel agreement, there is more evidence pointing to the hollowness of Arab and Muslim solidarity. Just consider the current Saudi-Pakistani spat over Kashmir, as well as a variety of feuds among Gulf states and between Turkey, the kingdom and the Emirates.
James Dorsey further stated that a key motivation for the United Arab Emirates -Israel agreement is that both countries worry that a potential election victory by presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden on November 3rd could bring an administration into office that is willing to seek accommodation with Iran. The establishment of diplomatic relations strengthens the United Arab Emirate’s position as one of the United States’ most important partners in the Middle East. And it allows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to argue that his hardline policy towards the Palestinians does not impede a broader peace between the Jewish state and Arab nations.
Alon Ben-Meir, Senior Fellow at New York University stated that the United Arab Emirate’s willingness to formally recognize Israel underscores an undeniable reality that the idea of Arab and Muslim solidarity exists in theory and rhetoric only. In reality, it gets trumped all the time by the hardnosed interests that various countries and their rulers pursue. It thus comes as no surprise that, as Messrs. Trump and Netanyahu and United Arab Emirates Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed were putting the final touches on their coordinated statements, traditional allies Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were locked into an escalating spat over Kashmir.
According to Alon Ben-Meir, this spat follows India’s 2019 move to revoke the autonomy of the Muslim-majority state of Jammu and Kashmir and to impose a brutal crackdown. Muslim countries, with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in the lead, have been reluctant to jeopardize their growing economic and military ties to India, effectively hanging Pakistan out to dry. The two Gulf states, instead of maintaining their traditional support for Pakistan, feted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as developments in Kashmir unfolded.
In response, Pakistan hit out at Saudi Arabia where it hurts. In rare public criticism of the kingdom, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi suggested that Pakistan would convene an Islamic conference outside the confines of the Saudi-controlled Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) after the group rejected Islamabad’s request for a meeting on Kashmir.
Uwe Bott, Chief Economist of The Global Research Center argued that targeting Saudi Arabia’s leadership and quest for Muslim religious soft power, Mr. Qureshi issued his threat eight months after Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan under Saudi pressure had bowed out of an Islamic summit in Kuala Lumpur convened by the kingdom’s critics, including Qatar, Turkey and Iran. Saudi Arabia’s obvious fear is that any challenge to its leadership could fuel demands that Saudi Arabia sign over custodianship of Mecca and Medina to a pan-Islamic body.
Uwe Bott further noted that after all, it is the custodianship and Saudi Arabia’s image as a leader of the Muslim world that persuaded United Arab Emirates Crown Prince Mohammed to reach out to Israel in the first place. The United Arab Emirates ruler is also obviously keen to use his embrace of dialogue with Jewish and Christian groups to bolster his tarnished image in Washington and other Western capitals.
The United Arab Emirate’s recognition of Israel puts Saudi Arabia more than any other Gulf state in the hot seat when it comes to establishing relations with Israel. And it puts the United Arab Emirate’s Prince Mohammed bin Zayed in the driver’s seat. That is all about national interests and competition and has very little to do with Arab or Muslim solidarity.

Insurers left unassured by NBE directive

0

Insurers expressed their shock to the highly anticipated investment of insurance fund directive that was reviewed by the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) recently.
The new directive that amends the 16 years old ‘licensing and supervision of insurance business investment of insurance funds directive no. SIB/25/2004’ highly disappointed insurers. The insurers had anticipated for better amendments that in turn would boost the sector’s investment in the economy.
The sector actors claimed that the NBE’s new directive indicated that the government was not intent for the insurance business and furthermore did not consider the actual economic situation and inflation parameters.
About 18 months ago the central bank drafted an amendment to improve the insurance fund investment on none cash (Treasury Bills and bank deposits) sector.
On the draft directive NBE had proposed that the general insurAance business be reduced, that is, the requirement to preserve 65 percent liquidity to 50 percent of the total asset of insurers and the balance for other businesses.
It has been proposed that from the total admitted assets of an insurance company, the company shall invest 20 percent in company shares from 15 percent of the 2004 directive.
At the same time the December 2018 draft directive stated that 25 percent of the asset would be invested in real estate contrary to 10 percent in the old directive.
Meanwhile, the recently issued amended directive, reverted both the former proposal of NBE and recommendation of insurers and put the Treasury Bills and bank deposits at 60 percent with only five percent reduction from the previous directive.
At the same time the highly anticipated percentage share approval on investment on real estate (purchase or construction of buildings) will not change from the previous 10 percent of the total assets shares. The draft was tabled to make it 25 percent.
The asset that shall be invested on company shares has increased by five percent and is now at 20 percent.
Besides raising their frustration on the amended directive, they claimed that the directive was carelessly done since 10 percent that was always allowed for free choice investment was left out in the directive.
“The new directive only stated the 90 percent of asset investments. I am confused why the 10 percent was not included in the new directive,” one of the long-serving insurance leader told Capital.
On the long term (life) insurance business the new directive did not change anything except excluding the article that stated that the insurance company shall invest 10 percent of its asset on investment based on its choice like the general insurance sector.
While on the draft proposal for the life insurance sector NBE had proposed to make 40 percent of the total asset to be liquid and insurers had recommended it to drop to 30 percent from the existing 50 percent.
“We have seen only five percent reduction on general insurance but the amended directive does not totally look at the life insurance sector,” the insurers stated as they expressed their anger.
“The government insisted that assets remain liquid than be actively invested in the economy,” one of the insurance presidents said, “this is an indicator of how the government shows no interest to improve the insurance business.”
Another insurance president that spoke with Capital expressed his feeling by stating, “it is ridiculous to spend time on discussion on the draft document if the actual amendment does not consider any of our recommendation. Why therefore should we spend our time on discussions that are not impactful?”
Similarly another insurance leader who demanded anonymity said, “at the current market condition putting the asset on T bills or bank deposit exposes the investment to be consumed by inflation and make zero/ cancel out the assets of insurers.”
“The new directive totally discourages investment that shall create not only wealth for companies but also massive job, but NBE did not understand this.”
The insurers have held discussions about the directive last week and have decided to pursue their anger to the NBE via a letter that will be written by their association, the Association of Ethiopian Insurers.
In a nutshell, insurers had eagerly awaited the revision of the directive, that they expected would be considerate for the current economic condition than the one issued to effectiveness about 16 years ago. They expected that the new directive will give them more room to expand their businesses on investing in different sectors mainly in the real estate business.
Recently NBE has amended different directives in the insurance sector. From the latest insurance business directives amendment NBE has also changed one sub article of the ‘Prohibition of Issuance of Certain Types of Bonds by Insurance Companies Directive no SIB/24/2004’ thus indicating a possibility for allowance of giving unconditional bonds.
The previous directive issued in 2004 prohibited insurers from issuing any unconditional bond.

The Addis land grabbing menace

0

Recent reports showing concern with regards to land grabbing in Addis Ababa has rendered the city administration to hold up the services of land management indefinitely.
At the beginning of this week Ethiopian Citizens for Social Justice (ECSJ) has disclosed that in the past few months thousands of square meters of land had been illegally taken.
According to Dereje Kassa, Deputy Head of Office of the Mayor and Cabinet Affairs, for an interim period, clarified that on the basis of land grabbing the city administration had decided to suspend the services of land management for the time being.
As he stated land banking and transferring, land development and urban renewal, construction permit and integrated land information services has been held up until the concerns are cleared up.
The study conducted on the matter concludes that illegal land grabbing and transforming of condominiums by politically motivated decisions has reached a critical high.
Key placed, road and public areas have been fenced illegally in five sub cities with officials in the Oromia region playing as the major actors in the land grabbing as per the report.
“The land grabbing and illegal transfer of condominiums was done by organized groups and individuals in the presence of security forces and with the involvement of officials and employees of the city administration,” states the report of ECSJ. The study accused officials of the city as they remained unconcerned as the grabbed lands were sold to a third party while police officers provided protection as ethnic Oromo youth fenced key places and vacant areas.
The former mayor has defended that the so called illegal transferring of the condominium units were decided by the cabinet affairs a year and half ago to those who were displaced from their land in order to build the condominium units.
“The condominium units were transferred to 20,000 of them who were in a worst situation from the 67,000 families who were forced to leave their land” said Takele in his Facebook page.
Recently the former deputy mayor Takele Uma announced the commencement of the land audit and registration scheme in a bid to tackle land grabbing issue and begun issuing title deeds to farmers starting from August 10.
The Deputy Mayor of Addis Ababa City Administration has told city officials to take immediate action in granting farmers, who own farming lands in the city’s surrounding areas, with a legally binding land title deed.
The city Administration will give title deeds to lands owned by farmers after they are registered as they are prone to be affected by land grabbing.
The land audit and registration drive will be backed by technological advancements in partnership with Ministry of Science and Innovation, according to Mayor’s Office.
The registration of lands owned by farmers will be completed till October 10, 2020.