Saturday, October 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 3289

Mequanenet set course record at Zurich

0

Ethiopia’s Mekuanenet Ayenew and Uganda’s Juliet Chekwel captured commanding victories at the 36th Zurich Maratón de Sevilla, a World Athletics Gold Label road race with respective clocking of 2:04:46 and 2:23:13.
Although Mequanenet had previously won marathons in Beijing and Venice, his pre-race PB stood at 2:09:00, so his victory in Seville was something of a surprise. The 29-year-old took almost two minutes off the course record.
Both men’s and women’s races had strong depth as seven men finished inside 2:07 and 14 broke the 2:08 barrier, while seven women went sub-2:28, confirming the new course is conducive to fast times.
The men’s race opened at brisk pace as a 15-man lead pack went through 5km in 14:45, led by pacemakers Henry Kiprop and Raymond Kipchumba. They passed 10km in 29:24 with all the main favorites in close attendance.
The pacesetters dropped out and by the 25th kilometer Kiplagat, Kiptum and Ayenew had broken away from the rest with the unknown Kiplagat, whose career best is 2:11:18, making most of the pace. Past the 30 km check-point the race became a two-horse battle. Mequanenet then moved to the front but they only travelled together for a couple of kilometers because at exactly the 34km point Mequanenet ’s relentless speed proved to be too fast for Kiptum and the Ethiopian began to build a sizeable gap.
Like a metronome, Mequanenet covered each kilometer section in 2:57 and even increased his speed over the closing stages to finish in a world-leading PB of 2:04:46, having recorded negative splits of 1:02:30 and 1:02:16.

Arbaminch and Butajera battling to Super league promotion

0

Edom Kedzo leading the strike force, former premier league side ArbaMinch Ketema posed to a surprise return to the top tier claiming Group ”C” top spot. A shocking 3-0 home defeat to cross town regional rival Selete-Werabe, Butajera shouldered off the top spot for the first time in the season. Debub Police and Ethiopia Medin are far from the leading party.
A strong defense that conceded only two goals in eight matches and a humble target man bagging six of eleven goals the team scored, unbeaten side Arbaminch is said to be the hottest favorite but for Butajera that is licking its wound after the heavy defeat in front of home supporters. A goal less draw in the latest clash against home side Ethiopia Medin, “The Alligators” claimed top spot with 22 points.
Licking its wound from the heavy home defeat Butajera is expected to recover fast and resume its strong promotion contention. Scoring eleven of the 16 goals between them strikers Belay Gezahne and Denkneh Kebede are capable of steering their side to promotion with some luck.
A marginal away victory over relegation threatened Yeka-Subcity, five points behind the leaders Gedeo Dilla takes third place. Though many considered the promotion race is between two horses (Arbaminch and Butajera) Gedeo is the only side considered outsider in the promotion race.
Former top tier sides Debub Police and Ethiopia Medin are rotting below mid-level sitting seventh and tenth respectively. Police collected 12 points from three wins, three draws and four defeats while Medin boasts only ten points from nine matches.

The G20 Compact With Africa And The Controversial Role Of Private Foreign Capital

The Compact with Africa (CwA) is the first comprehensive initiative between the G20 and Africa. The Compact with Africa’s primary objective is to increase the attractiveness of private investment in Africa through substantial improvements to the macro, business and financing frameworks. It aims to leverage private financing for infrastructure projects via blended finance to mobilise subsequent foreign direct investment (FDI) flows.
Do good governance and good institutions help attract private capital flows? If they do, can we expect these private flows to stimulate sustainable transformation by promoting structural shifts towards higher productivity? A number studies shown that there is no straightforward answer to this question.
Firstly, while global private capital has been shown to be highly cyclical, driven by United States monetary policy and risk aversion and thus by push factors, equity flows, both portfolio equity and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), have been shown to be pulled in by better governance and institutional scores. Secondly, private flows can be both disruptive and transformative: disruptive, often as a result of excessive and mismatched debt that eventually leads to financial crises; transformative through the removal of infrastructure bottlenecks or, indirectly, through lowering the cost of risk capital.
It is not a country’s framework conditions but rather United States monetary policy that is one of the principal drivers of capital flow cycles to poor countries. This latter point is especially pertinent today, given that we find ourselves at the tail end of a decade of extraordinary monetary stimulus that is gradually being unravelled. Global risk aversion is another factor as it pushes money into Least Industrial Countries when it is low and pulls it out when heightened. In his article published on “Journal of Economic Surveys” in April 2018, Robin Koepke stated that on an aggregate capital level, push factors such as global risk aversion and external interest rates are found to be most important for portfolio debt flows, somewhat less for banking flows and least of all for FDI.
According to empirical studies, by Andres Rodriguez-Pose and Gilles Cols, portfolio inflows are generally significantly affected by governance measures such as the rule of law, property rights and institutional quality. Similarly, with regards to sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), studies tend to find that the rule of law and institutional quality are significant but further report that political stability and government effectiveness are also decisive. However, even with relatively good governance indicators, portfolio flows have been deterred by the regions poor record when it comes to rule of law and political stability. So the CwA’s emphasis on governance and institutions to attract private cross-border capital to relatively well-run African countries was coherent with respect to its initial focus on portfolio flows from large institutional investors such as pension funds.
The 2018 African Economic Outlook report indicates that infrastructure funding is crucial for Africa’s sustainable transformation. Yet, a significant infrastructure financing deficit, estimated at between 68 billion and 108 billion US dollars annually, needs to be bridged. Given the notorious lack of infrastructure in Africa, which acts as a bottleneck to intraregional trade, urban habitat and rural development, and hence also to transformative growth, the main sources of funding for infrastructure in Africa do not suggest that they have been held back by Western-style governance standards.
What about the flow-transformation nexus? The Compact with Africa aims to foster the conditions for long-term private investment, investment in infrastructure and also for economic partnership and employment in African countries with the objective of promoting sustained and inclusive growth. Institutional investments by both pension funds and life insurers as well as FDI can benefit Africa. Institutional investors enjoy long-term liabilities in their balance sheets, unlike commercial banks or hedge funds, which are essential to fund Africa’s infrastructure and a key growth prerequisite for the continent.
FDI, in turn, requires a modern infrastructure, particularly energy and connectivity, to fully utilise its external benefits. FDI can entail spillovers contributing to the modernisation of production capacity, knowledge transfer, integration into global and regional value chains, and also employment for the jobless. Unlike portfolio flows, corporate FDI reflects a long-term commitment and is hard to reverse, thus providing stability. However, in view of analytical and empirical evidence for List Industrial Countries, trust in the role of cross-border private capital flows to low-income Africa is controversial.
Although finance is needed for economic development, excessive or unstable cross-border flows can damage economic growth, impede poverty alleviation and exacerbate income inequality. List Industrial Countries continue to experience strong pro-cyclical swings in external financing in terms of availability, maturity and cost. Yet they lack the financial safety net provided by swap arrangements among central banks in developed countries to manage these cycles.
Debt-creating flows, in the presence of narrow and illiquid domestic financial mar- kets, introduce currency and maturity mismatches into corporate and government balance sheets. These balance sheet mismatches have repeatedly proved to be time bombs. The nature of equity flows, by contrast, is much more development friendly. List Industrial Countries seek to attract FDI to benefit from the associated external benefits via technology, learning, integration into value chains and global market access. Portfolio equity inflows can, but do not necessarily, stimulate long-term growth prospects. They help to develop efficient stock markets and foster economic growth by reducing the hurdle rate for investments and small business development.
FDI is an accounting convention not a net private capital flow, as it may be funded by local debt or by imported machinery. Large one-off merger and acquisition deals and corporate restructuring may inflate FDI numbers, while greenfield investment counts mostly for productivity enhancement in a low-income economy. FDI statistics also reflect other factors, including tax avoidance, which makes it difficult to differentiate between FDI for long-term investments, which serves as a source of growth, and FDI that is purely financial and has little real economic impact as it merely passes through an economy.
This latter type of FDI also obscures the ultimate sources and destinations of FDI. There is emerging evidence that FDI can also be pro- cyclical, and there is mixed evidence on the relationship between FDI and productivity in different sectors. Recent research has identified a negative relationship be- tween FDI and productivity since 2000. It was found that the composition of FDI was concentrated by sector and that those sectors (such as extractives) had a negative impact on total factor productivity and for promoting transformational growth.
In a much-cited paper, Helene Rey provides conclusive analytical and empirical evidence to this effect. She argued that gains to international capital flows have proved elusive whether in calibrated models or in the data. Large gross flows disrupt asset markets and financial intermediation, so the costs may be very large. To deal with the global financial cycle and the dilemma, we have the following four policy options: targeted capital controls; acting on one of the sources of the financial cycle itself, the monetary policy of the Fed and other main central banks; acting on the trans-mission channel cyclically by limiting credit growth and leverage during the upturn of the cycle, using national macro-prudential policies; and acting on the transmission channel structurally by imposing stricter limits on leverage for all financial intermediaries.
Given this background to private capital flows, the Compact with Africa could be described as audacious. The Compact postulates that macroeconomic stability, an investor-friendly business environment and effective financial sector intermediation are necessary conditions to spur private investment. Kappel and Reisen argued in their study on the Compact that such premises are unsuitable for Least Industrial Countries. All 12 African Compact countries produce such a low yearly income per head that they are either classified as Least Industrial Countries or lower-middle-income countries.
The strong negative link between per capita income and the relative importance of private finance in cross-border financial flows may have driven the Compact with Africa, notably via instruments of risk mitigation. Of course the negative link works both ways: It would be impressive if the Compact with Africa managed to meet the challenge of stimulating private flows into African compact partner countries. The same expectation should reasonably also hold ex-ante for African infrastructure funding. Traditionally, the private response to funding African infrastructure has been negligible.

Why is Physical Activity Important?

0

Staying physically active is very important. It shows that you care about your health and well-being. Usually, those who prefer outdoor activities are running or walking. When the weather conditions do not allow this, some people go to the gym. Those who enjoy sports and are more physically active can do different exercises. Doing physical activities do not only improves your health, but it makes you look and feel better.

Release Stress

So, why being physically active is very important? Probably, the biggest reason is to stay away from the everyday routines, which includes family obligations, going to work, watching TV, etc. Physical activities help the body release the stress and anxiety that we collect throughout the day. It noticeably improves your mood and makes you feel happier.

Believe it or not, playing online games is an interesting way to chill out and forget your problems. You can play online casino games while sitting on your sofa and you don’t need to leave your comfort zone. Many of the online casino websites have great selection of games, which are not only fun to play, but you can also earn some money too. They can be any online games including the huge selection of online casino games at Casimba. There is no particular games genre that is especially good for releasing stress. If you are a new player, many of these online casino sites offer bonus packages and promotions you can use to play games for real money.

Body strength

When someone is not physically active, it becomes clearer because the muscles lose their strength and the body slowly loses its ability to do physical activities. Doing exercises is also a good way to keep your energy and be ready to do all the regular obligations. It is known that sitting for a long time increases the chances of developing some cardiovascular diseases.

Something that we all know is that keeping your body physically active also makes you live longer. People who exercise regularly are people who live longer.

Health Benefits

Physical activity is closely connected to the food you eat and your regular eating habits. Obesity is one of the biggest problems nowadays. The reasons for being obese are being physically inactive and eating unhealthy food. A shocking fact is that a third of the USA population is obese. Only 30 minutes of physical activity for adults and an hour for children will significantly improve your health and well-being in general.

It is also a solution for those having problems sleeping at night. Physical activity can also help you fall asleep easily and deepen your dream. However, do not do exercises close enough before you go to sleep. It might boost your energy and you won’t feel sleepy and want to go to bed.

To conclude, being physically active can have many benefits. One of them is increasing the energy level that helps you perform daily activities easily. Another one is the health benefit, preventing many diseases and being overweight. Last but not least, once you try some kind of exercise that you like, you will never stop doing it.