Thursday, May 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 3479

Liverpool win Premier League Jurgen Klopp’s transformative role

0

when Jurgen Klopp walked into Anfield for his first day as Liverpool manager on 8 October 2015, there was one keynote message from his public address.

“We must turn from doubters to believers,” said the charismatic German as he sat in front of the cameras and lights of the world’s media.

Less than five years on, no-one doubts Klopp or his players. After a remarkable rise from 10th place on his arrival to European champions for the sixth time, they have now returned to their domestic perch as Premier League champions, too.

Liverpool and their manager were forced to wait an extra three months for their coronation as the season was halted by the global coronavirus pandemic but the silverware is reward for his revitalisation of the club and its support.

Klopp’s public persona is the big man with the tactile approach and the booming laugh. The animated presence in the technical area, celebrating with players and fans. So much more goes on behind the public image – so much more that gives the lie to those who nonsensically claimed Klopp’s greatest coaching quality in his early days was as a cheerleader.

Behind the scenes, away from the public gaze, his meticulous approach, as well as his intellect for football’s modern methods and matters outside the game, make him the towering figure in Liverpool’s spectacular revival.

The notion that he simply strolls around Melwood smiling and hugging people may sustain those who wish to pour cold water on his brilliant successes, or downplay his tactical shrewdness. The reality could not be more different.

Klopp believes the training ground is where the difference is made. This is where the drills are run through, where tactical ideas are tried and tested. Bolt onto this some spectacular recruitment and you have the 2019-20 Premier League champions.

Every session is meticulously planned with his staff before training. Klopp will then address his players to outline their work in depth. He is not just Liverpool’s manager, he is Liverpool’s coach. Every aspect of every day is plotted and analysed in minute detail. In preparing for games, he insatiably gathers information before condensing it into the essential and most urgent details. Inside Anfield this is regarded as a key skill that helps drive one of his best qualities – the ability to take big decisions quickly, without prevarication, and getting those decisions right.

Klopp himself is the exact model of planning and efficiency he expects of others. He insists on punctuality, on everything operating like clockwork. If a meeting is planned for 10am, 10am it is. His and Liverpool’s success is the result of a fiercely driven individual. The hard work of the manager and all those behind him. As he says: “I live 100% for the boys, with the boys.”

There are no gimmicks. No “Hollywood” moment was transformative in the story leading to Liverpool’s coronation as Premier League champions. Klopp is the leader, strategist and inspiration. But of course there is also a team behind him.

When the German arrived at Anfield it was inevitable that he would be joined by two of his closest, most trusted allies – ZeljkoBuvac and Peter Krawietz.

Buvac and Krawietz had been central to Klopp’s management team at Mainz and Borussia Dortmund. The trio came as a package wherever he went. Within that structure, the taciturn Bosnian-Serb Buvac was known as “The Brain” for his awareness of tactical detail while German Krawietz was “The Eye” for his acute analytical skills.

But when Buvac’s 17-year association with Klopp ended suddenly in April 2018, it led to a new dynamic in Liverpool’s coaching set-up – and new levels of success.

Klopp, of course, is the leader in all respects, while Krawietz is now joined by Pep Ljinders.

The 37-year-old Dutchman had already made a huge impression at Liverpool, having worked at the club as an under-16s coach before being appointed first-team development coach in 2015.

Three years later, Ljinders left to take over as manager of NEC Nijmegen in the Netherlands. It proved to be a short stint and when he left, Klopp had no hesitation in bringing him back for the start of the 2018-19 season to fill the gap vacated by Buvac.

Both Krawietz and Lijnders are assistant managers. No hierarchy exists and both serve crucial, differing roles within Klopp’s team. Krawietz runs a team of four analysts, focusing on all aspects of previous and forthcoming games – a role so integral it shapes training sessions and team selection. He is on the training ground every day.

An example of how the Klopp-Krawietz partnership works is seen in messages exchanged by the pair during the 2018 World Cup in Russia.

They had homed in on the increasing influence of set-pieces, both defensive and attacking, and a decision was made to be more innovative, especially as Liverpool were now armed with the height of Virgil van Dijk and the delivery of Trent Alexander-Arnold. The facts speak for themselves.

In 2017-18, Liverpool scored 13 goals and conceded 12 from set-pieces. Increased focus and innovation following the World Cup saw them score 29 and concede only eight in the subsequent campaign.

Such enlightened attention to detail even included the arrival of a dedicated throw-in coach, the Dane Thomas Gronnemark, after the tournament, an appointment designed to eradicate errors and maximise the many re-starts from this position during games.

However, Liverpool and Krawietz are not slaves to specifics. He and Klopp still want room for free thinking and spontaneity at set-pieces. What greater example than Trent Alexander-Arnold’s quickly taken corner that caught Barcelona cold in last season’s Champions League semi-final second leg at Anfield?

During a normal week at Melwood, Krawietz will usually present Klopp with 90 minutes of analytical detail which will be whittled down over the course of two meetings to a 25-30 minute presentation which the manager will deliver the day before the game.

The main aim of the session is that Liverpool’s players are made aware of their opponents’ strengths. But they also leave the room with greater confidence in their own ability to do damage.

VAR: Premier League confirms wrong penalty decisions in all Thursday game

0

incorrect penalty decisions were made by the video assistant referee in all three of Thursday’s games, the Premier League has told BBC Match of the Day.

Bruno Fernandes won a spot-kick which he scored in Manchester United’s 3-0 win over Aston Villa.

James Ward-Prowse hit the bar after a disputed penalty as Southampton drew 1-1 with Everton.

And Tottenham should have had a penalty for a Joshua King shove on Harry Kane in a 0-0 draw with Bournemouth.

The Premier League confirmed United and Southampton should not have been given penalties, but Tottenham should have been awarded one.

Former Everton midfielder Tim Cahill, a Match of the Day pundit, said a former player should be involved to work alongside the VAR officials at Stockley Park.

“I think that would really help them, to understand the movements,” the former Australia international said.

“When a player falls to buy a penalty you can feel it. It must need a player there to give advice on what the player is doing.

“They’re there to make the big decisions and they can’t do it. It’s really disappointing.”

Fifa is taking over direct responsibility of VAR from football rulemakers IFAB and is expected to insist on greater consistency across more than 100 global leagues, on issues such as the use of pitchside monitors.

There has been confusion in the Premier League, with referees’ chief Mike Riley limiting the use of monitors to not slow the game down.

Mourinho: ‘Powerful people do not like to be criticised’

Tottenham were not given a penalty for this Joshua King shove on Harry Kane

Tottenham manager Jose Mourinho said “everyone in the world” thought his side should have had a penalty, apart from video assistant referee Michael Oliver.

King pushed Kane in the back as he defended a cross but referee Paul Tierney did not award a penalty and Oliver chose not to intervene.

Oliver, who will referee Sunday’s north London derby against Arsenal, was also the VAR official when Kane had a goal ruled out in Spurs’ 3-1 defeat by Sheffield United last week.

“The game had the most important moment – you know when, you know who,” said the Spurs boss.

Mourinho told BBC MOTD he feels “powerful people do not like to be criticised”.

Asked to clarify who he was referring to, Mourinho told Sky Sports: “The same referee that was the VAR against Sheffield United. In the world, everybody knows that is a penalty. And I say everybody, I mean everybody.

“Like Sheffield, the man of the match was not one of the players. But at Sheffield I could blame myself and the players, today I could not do that.”

BBC Match of the Day pundit Dion Dublin said: “It’s clear because Harry is setting himself ready to head that ball and he gets fouled. It is a penalty.”

Smith: ‘Disgraceful decision’ to give United penalty

Bruno Fernandes benefited from the penalty he won – by scoring his eighth Manchester United goal

Moments after Trezeguet hit the post for Villa, United won a penalty which Fernandes converted to set them on their way to a 3-0 win.

The Portuguese pirouetted on the ball and appeared to catch Villa defender EzriKonsa’s leg – but referee Jon Moss awarded a penalty, a decision supported by VAR.

Fernandes scored from the spot to set United on their way to victory and leave Villa four points from safety.

The Premier League match centre told Match of the Day: “It was the wrong decision. It should have been overturned by VAR but wasn’t and should actually have been a foul on Konsa.”

Aston Villa manager Dean Smith calls VAR’s decision on Man United’s penalty ‘baffling’

Villa boss Dean Smith called it a “disgraceful decision”.

“I can understand Jon [Moss, referee] getting it wrong but I don’t know what VAR are looking at,” he said. “They have a screen they can go and look at it but they don’t seem to be bothered.

“Fernandes is trying a double drag-back – his first touch is on the ball, his second touch is on EzriKonsa’s shin.”

His Manchester United counterpart, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, disagreed.

“I think it’s a penalty. The boy sticks out his leg, Fernandes does a fantastic Zidane, Maradona turn and he lands on him,” he said.

Dublin, who played for both clubs, said: “It’s clearly, in our opinion, not a penalty.

“Anybody who has played the game knows what Fernandes is trying to do. He does the turn and he gets it wrong. He puts his stud on Konsa’s shin. It changed the game.

“VAR is there to say has the referee made an error and they didn’t think he had. That might cost Villa millions.”

Cahill said: “It’s a big mistake. I feel for Aston Villa. This totally goes against them. VAR needs to step in and it needs to protect the players as well.”

Saints’ disputed penalty

Southampton got a penalty when James Ward-Prowse seemed to fall towards Ande Gomes

The Premier League also confirmed Southampton should not have had a penalty against Everton.

Ward-Prowse appeared to fall into the standing Andre Gomes, although he missed the penalty as he hit the crossbar.

“The performance of the referee was like my team, not so good,” said Everton boss Carlo Ancelotti.

“Straightaway we said no penalty,” said MOTD pundit Cahill.

The post COVID 19 geopolitics

Geopolitical rivalry, and the reasons that sustain it, has not stopped with coronavirus. Depending on its depth and duration, the crisis could lead to a more cooperative or a more divided world. Or it could lead to ongoing tension between these two alternatives for an indefinite period. Here are some core tenets of the current geopolitical environment: In absolute terms all states or groups of states are going to emerge weakened from this crisis. Andres Ortega, Senior Research fellow at the Elcano Royal Institute in Spain stated that the world may witness greater or lesser geopolitical rivalry, but based on weaker powers. This could possibly result in temptations to overreach.

However, they come along with reduced abilities to act upon them. The UN has been completely absent during the crisis. Only a restoration of trust among the great powers will be capable of establishing the centrality of the UN Security Council. The WHO has proved inadequate. A much better equipped global health system is needed. The G20 worked in 2018 because there was United States, British and French leadership.

Andres Ortega noted that now, with the Saudis in the chair not so much. At the present time, the G20 is being reduced to a framework lacking genuine capacity for coordination. The existing structures do not work. Here are some of the most likely structural developments: Acceleration of the process of de-Westernization. This was already underway owing to the rise of the East, which could, nonetheless, be slowed down, although not reversed by the crisis, as well as because of the internal divisions within the West. One of the intriguing questions: Will we become more “Asiatic” in terms of a general mindset, and therefore more community-minded and less individualistic?

According to Andres Ortega, the decline of Europe has been described for a long, long time. Currently, there are even real concerns about the collapse of the EU if it is not able to react in a concerted fashion post-COVID 19. Conversely, the reality shock of, and the pressures from, the COVID 19 crisis may be strong enough to bring about new economic and geopolitical progress towards European integration. During the pandemic, United States global leadership has been completely absent, in marked contrast to the Obama administration’s reaction to the Ebola epidemic. One factor that will weigh decisively on scenarios over the medium term is whether President Donald Trump is re-elected in November.

Alexei Bayer, a New York based Economic Analyst stressed that a Democrat such as Joe Biden in the White House from January – likely with a female Vice President who could replace him at any time, if needed – could drive a more multilateral approach. That would imply more attention being given to the importance of allies to the United States, while the United States distancing to Russia and China would be maintained.

Alexei Bayer further noted that, the United States Chinese rivalry will continue. This rivalry will become a structural factor in the new world order, especially with regard to the struggle for technological and ideological domination. China, following its management of the health crisis, has seen an opportunity to bolster its international image and utility. However, as more becomes known about what actually happened with the outbreak, China’s currently rather good image may change.  In addition, China has major internal economic and social problems, which may undermine the financial capabilities it has earmarked for some of its geopolitical instruments, such as the Belt and Road Initiative. Even so, the world’s center of gravity will continue shifting towards the East, including in ideological terms.

Frank Vogl, Co-founder of Transparency International and author of “Waging War on Corruption: Inside the Movement Fighting the Abuse of Power” stated that there are many other pressing issues to be dealt with. On most of them, trendlines are not moving in a positive direction. For example, the need to prioritize national aid for the underprivileged will reduce development aid even further and also cast even greater doubt on the attainment of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. And, of course, we are back at a time where countries only a short while ago being deemed as emerging may well be submerging. That isn’t just true for Africa and Latin America. Due to the steep fall in the oil price, Russia faces severe problems.

Andres Ortega adamantly argued that there will be three scenarios for the path ahead. Amidst this convoluted and heavily burdened global landscape, let me set out three illustrative examples as base scenarios. In doing that, I am fully aware of the dangers of simplification. But one way or another, we need to attempt to get a grasp of a reality that is enormously complex.

The first scenario is “Each for himself”. Andres Ortega stated that the United States, the self-ascribed richest country on earth, has already reached a staggeringly high unemployment levels. But it certainly isn’t just there that the lure of deglobalization (“my country first”) is offered up as a way out. Social unrest can further strengthen the populists and authoritarian regimes. Presumably well-established democracies will possibly have to contend with the collapse of the middle classes. If not global chaos, the forces of de-Westernization and de-Europeanization will find further fuel.

The second scenario is “Collective international intelligence”. According to Andres Ortega, this is the rosy scenario. While the health crisis persists over the mid-long term, the spirit and logic of real international cooperation kicks in, both in the fight against the virus and in the recovery from the economic crisis. The G20 provide useful fiscal stimulus measures and there are moves toward a global health system. There is a gentle reform of capitalism, providing for a greater role for the public sector. Social protests are limited thanks to direct aid and lines of credit for companies.

Thus, there is limited de-globalization. We even see greater European integration, with the financial and political institutions working in the same direction. Trust in governments recovers.  Geopolitical confrontation between the United States and China, and with Russia, is considerably lowered. At times, it seems as if the spirit of a single humanity could thrive.

The third scenario is “Step by step muddling through”. Andres Ortega noted that here is the middle scenario: The crisis persists over the short-medium term. There is a degree of international cooperation in the healthcare field, but there is no coordination in the fiscal-economic realm. The economy in the EU as a whole starts to recover slowly, but it does not revert to its position prior to the crisis, remaining for a time in depression.  Social protests rise due to the high levels of unemployment which show no sign of abating, but the system does not collapse. While there are localized coronavirus events, we do not see a reactivation of global flows.

What we see is more nationalism and protectionism. The EU remains half-built. The European Central Bank (ECB), the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the Commission all function, but the European Council does not succeed in coordinating itself and acting in an integrated way on the joint fiscal stimulus issue. It is clear that the second scenario is the most advantageous, while the first is the least advantageous. The likely outcome of a “new normality” is a mix.

The life of Hachalu

0

Hachalu Hundessa, an iconic Oromiffa singer who well known for his motivational songs, was shot dead, around Lebu Condo area, on Monday June 29 at around 9:30 pm.
The heartbreaking news of Hachalu, 36, has been a disaster for his fans who mourns for days. “Hachalu was not just a person and a singer, but he was true a symbol of Oromo resistance. He was a courage personified,” one of his fans wrote on social media.
Hachalu, who was born in Ambo, 125km west of Addis Ababa, is well known by his inspirational songs like ‘Malan jira’ and ‘Jira’. These and other songs of Hachalu are stated as a tool to accelerate the demand for freedom and democracy in the society.
Most of his fans described Hachalu as a hero, who choose to fight the authoritarian regime without fear while others preferred to lay low or leave their homeland.
In an interview with an Amharic magazine in May 2018, Hachalu described himself as a politician, “anyone can not be separated from politics even though he or she are not a member of political party or does not have direct role in politics. I may not be a member of the parliament, or leading public offices but I will contribute my part by using my profession,” he was quoted as saying.
Hachalu has been harassed and imprisoned in different occasions in past many years.
According to him, his songs have been banned to be aired on radio and TV stations and even he could not perform In Addis Ababa for years.
After the current political change came and the country go through a democratic reform about two years ago, business elites recognized the singer for his role and awarded him an automobile that is worth over 2 million birr. At the time he said that it is a symbol to give recognition for his contribution and encourage him to do more to serve the society.
Even though the musician plays music in Oromiffa language he has fans from societies who does not understand the language.
On his one of interviews Hachalu stated that he listens all songs from old to contemporary from different nationalities in the country, “that helps me come up with strong melody that get acceptance with all cultures and ethnical diversities.”
Eye witnesses indicated that the singer was shot on left side of his chest, while he was sitting inside his car.
The musician’s body was laid at his birth place, Ambo, on July 2 in a funeral procession attended by his family, friends and thousands of his fans.
On Saturday July 4, 2020 a fundraising committee met at the Sheraton Addis to discuss ways on how to help Hachalu’s family consistently. The committee comprised of government officials and other stakeholders said that there will be no fundraising committee to help the musician’s family but the legitimate one will be theirs. Hachalu is survived by his wife and three children.