A final minute winning goal from a spot kick Saint George joined the fierce Ethiopian Premier League title race. The Horse Riders currently share the third spot collecting same 32 points but in goal differences.
Though a much needed three points that slashed Mekele’s lead in to five points thus left the title race in to wide open, but many club supporters are unhappy with English Coach Stewart Hall. Short of refreshing ideas to make the better use of his squads Hall managed to shut out the lonely destroyer Ammanuel G/Kidan thus the narrow home victory brought home more than three points.
Of course the visitors were hardly up to expectation thus Saint George dominated both in possession and creating goal chances. But with all golden chances flew in to thin air, central defender Aschalew Tamene converted the winning goal from a spot kick just four minutes in to the final whistle.
With the win Saint George closed the gap between the title contenders as well slashing the leaders eight point in to five with second place Fasil Town. “It was a tough showdown but we happened to be the one to go home with all three points” Stewart Hall remarked. Mekele Coach Gebremedin Haile also suggested that he is not convinced for the last minute penalty. “This is Saint George’s’ seventh penalty so far in the season while the first for us” Gebre stated.
With eight fixtures to go, title favorite Mekele Town need to stay focused on every single match for the fixtures against: title contender Sidama Coffee, in good form Jimma AbaJifar and popular side Ethiopia Coffee which are all away matches and intriguing. Fasil Town lurking five points behind and Saint George breathing hot from far, it is a real testing time for Gebremedin on his way to became the recent time first ever Premier League Coach with back to back title.
Saint George in fierce title contention
What do you see?
With the economic growth our country is going through there are many new opportunities coming our way. And for those of us who are lucky enough to travel abroad, we come across businesses that can be done here as well, be it in an adapted form and within the boundaries of our own context.
The question is, do we recognise the opportunity? And when we recognise the opportunity, do we consider taking it? I see many of us do and I see some taking the risk. And then some succeed while others fail. Taking calculated risks, based on a sound feasibility study and risk analysis, supported by competent financial institutions is critical though. Sometimes an opportunity passes, and a new opportunity may not come again for some time. Sometimes we miss opportunities because we are afraid to take the risk, or we don’t have the confidence that we have the capacity to handle the challenges.
Ask a class of six-year olds who can sing, and all will raise their hands at once. Ask a group of adults the same and most will hesitate. Perhaps one or two will come forward, still doubting whether they can sing indeed. So, what happens between the time we were young – when we were spontaneous and ready to take on anything even if we have never done it before – and the time we have grown older? Somewhere down the road called life, we get discouraged, we fail and are afraid to make mistakes. People tell us: “You can’t do that, that’s impossible!”
Ever noticed how a one year old tries to walk, falls, stands up and tries again? Ever seen that smile on her face when she made the first few steps? But soon after that the adults come in and, in their desire, to protect the child from hurting herself, they discourage her: “Don’t do that. Don’t go there. You will fall. You will hurt yourself!” And so, many of us grow up, discouraged, with little self confidence, and little experience in taking a risk, trying something new, learning, falling and getting up again.
I have observed much of the same in the business environment here. When somebody has an original idea, wants to try something new, something out of the ordinary, is about to take a risk, there is more often negative feed back than encouragement. And as people here rely much on the advice and council of close ones, the risk is rarely taken. Thus, many opportunities are lost. It seems saver to do what others are doing also, copy what seems to work for others. But without having the original idea, without having a vision for success, this road will only take us to mediocrity or failure. Beware that the ones that are successful are the ones who dared to take a risk, a calculated risk that is, …….. and work hard, very hard, to make it happen. Which brings me to another interesting observation. Many people believe that once you are in business, money will be made just like that. You start a business and you drive a Merc, build a house, travel the world. Not without hard work, you don’t. When a new business begins to pick up, returns often need to be reinvested immediately to be able to manage the growth. More workers need to be hired, more equipment is required, more production is needed to meet the growing demand. No time yet to buy a new car or pay more salary to yourself. It normally takes a few years before you can really pick the fruits of the work.
Those who recognise an opportunity and are willing to take the risk, work hard and reinvest in their business may succeed, no guarantees though. These days, more and more opportunities seem to come our way, as the trends in development cooperation all seem to support the development of the private sector and a free market economy. New opportunities indeed, or so it seems. For those who produce for export for example, they need to build enough capacity to produce the quantities normally required by export markets. In addition, producers need to be able to meet quality standards and adjust their products to the ever-changing trends in fashion, colours, shapes and tastes. And then there are issues related to the supply of raw materials and logistics involved in exporting. If the temperature in the cargo section of an aircraft is not kept at the right level, there is big chance that the fresh fruits or vegetables will not survive the journey for instance. So, while the opportunities are appealing, and many producers would like to have a go at it, a lot of work needs to be done. Work that many producers have not learnt enough yet. Learning is what needs to happen, in an environment that is relatively safe. Like the child that learns to walk, with the watchful and encouraging words of the parents. It is here, where donors, development agencies and authorities have a big responsibility. It is not enough for experts to come in and judge that a product is not good enough or too expensive. They need to support the producers in further designing and developing their products. It is not enough to make funds available to develop policy; policy needs to support those who are willing to take a risk. It is not enough to encourage export; the whole supply chain needs to be considered. There are opportunities indeed, but they can only be taken step by step and with integrated support.
Nobody knew how to run before learning how to walk first. And no parent wants to expose a child to danger, while exploring the world and growing up. Instead they encourage, support and guide.
In conclusion I’d encourage the entrepreneur to look out for the opportunities, carefully consider and take a risk, while seeking and getting the required support to make the opportunity reality.
Look out, what do you see|?
Ton Haverkort
Simon Russom
Name: Simon Russom
Education: MSC in Mechanical Engineering
Company name: Compound Lounge
Studio Title: Owner
Founded in: 2019
What it does: Sells liquors
HQ: Around Bole Medhanealem
Number of employees: 35
Startup Capital: Two million birr
Current capital: Growing
Reasons for starting the business: To provide better service
Biggest perk of ownership: Creative freedom
Biggest strength: Commitment
Plan: To expand
First career: Renting construction machines
Most interested in meeting: PM Abiy Ahmed
Most admired person: Richard Branson
Stress reducer: Watching movies
Favorite past-time: Working
Favorite book: ‘Yaltmelesew Babaure’ By Tesfaye Gebreab
Favorite destination: Hawassa
Favorite automobile: Toyota
TERRORISM AND ALL
Terrorism, be it an action of the state or that of a non-state actors, must be subdued if humanity desires an orderly collective life across the continents. Humanity already has plenty of problems, which that are going to keep it busy for decades to come, assuming we do not destroy life before that. The unsustainable economic regime is one. Climate change or the broader environmental destruction that continues unabated is another. As if these are not enough challenges, we now face increased chaos associated with what is called ‘terrorism’. To be sure, this word is coined by the states. The presumption being; their violent activities do not constitute ‘terrorism’!
We beg to differ! Modern states are actively engaged, directly or indirectly in terrorist acts, even though these acts are not called ‘terrorism’. The only difference between the two; the state has a lot of resources to hide its terroristic activities, while those labeled ‘terrorists’ do not. The states conduct wars. Non-state actors engage in ‘terrorism’. We need to clarify our position from the outset. We do not condone any form of violence, organized or not. However, unless we emphasize the role of the state in furthering ‘terrorism’ situations are not going to change for the better. For example, take the case of Yemen. In Yemen it is the innocents that are dying left and right. State actors are bombarding children, women, the old, etc., indiscriminately. The ‘deep state’ of the powerful states tries to hide this reality in Yemen, by making sure MSM (main stream media) looks the other way. But the world has started to notice, despite the cover up efforts of the powerful. Only few days ago, the president of the United States vetoed a congressional bill that was intended to stop sales of offensive weapons to those states that were/are actively engaged in the killing of innocents. This says a lot about states and their interests. It doesn’t really matter what name this atrocious activity is called, so long as it is intended to kill neutral civilians, it is terrorism!
On the other side of the stupid game, there are the so-called non-state actors. Last week on the Christian Holy Day of Easter, over 350 people were killed in Sri Lanka. They were the devout, local hotel employees as well as visitors from abroad. Those who claimed responsibility (see the article on pages 66, 76 and 78) to this heinous act gave a statement to the effect that this particular terrorist act was retaliation to what happened in New Zealand last month. It would be recalled that fifty Moslems were killed in Christchurch last month! It is time the better part of humanity takes serious look at what is happening in our world. From the look of things, states and non-state actors are going to continue this stupid tit-for-tat game until the whole world becomes a very disagreeable place to live in. Take note, we have active non-state actors playing a very disgusting role in places like Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Libya or for that matter, in the whole of the Sahel countries (Mali, Niger, Nigeria, et al). Despite all the rationalizing noises from both sides, what we are witnessing is a continuous escalation of violence!
Level headed humanity must come together and address the situation, however difficult it is. The so-called international organizations have lost and continue to lose their credibility. The UN has become a talk shop with hardly any convincing clout of its own. It is only the very few powerful countries that dictate its policies. See the articles next column on page 50 and 51. Christians and Moslems must come together to deliberate on various issues with a view to calm/temper these two destructive entities, namely the state and non-state actors!
Here are few interestingly reflective quotations on ‘terrorism’ that might help us understand the logic behind our current sad situation. ‘Everyone’s worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there’s really an easy way: Stop participating in it.’ Noam Chomsky. ‘How can you have a war on terrorism when war itself is terrorism?’ Howard Zinn. ‘The object of terrorism is terrorism. The object of oppression is oppression. The object of torture is torture. The object of murder is murder. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?’ George Orwell (1984). ‘There is no moral difference between a Stealth bomber and a suicide bomber. They both kill innocent people for political reasons.’ Tony Benn. Finally, here is the former president of the US. “One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.” George W. Bush. Good Day!


