Sunday, April 26, 2026
Home Blog Page 4022

Accessing safe water

0

A report by the World Health Organisation (WHO) revealed that access to safe water and sanitation is a major problem in Ethiopia. Water and sanitation coverage rates in the country are among the lowest in the world. Water Aid also has issued a report showing that 93 percent of the Ethiopian population lacks a safe toilet. Many are forced to defecate in the open and hence spread diseases like diarrhea. So people can access water and toilets without waiting for government funding, Water.org, founded by Gary White a water engineer and Matt Damon, a famous film actor started a project that connects people with bank and micro financial institutions so that people in developing countries can access loans, construct their own toilets and install pipelines. Ethiopia is one of the countries benefiting from this ambitious project. Capital’s Tesfaye Getnet sat down with Salfiso Kitabo, Country Director of Water.org to learn more about the sanitation challenge in Ethiopia and their project. Salfiso has been working in this sector for over 25 years. He was a country director for a Canadian organization before joining Water.org about two years ago. Excerpts.

 

Capital: What makes you focus on water and sanitation now and why do you think these are important topics for public discourse?
Salfiso Kitabo: A child dies somewhere in the world every two minutes from illness related to water and sanitation issues. According to recent reports, in Ethiopia, 23 children die each day (8,500 a year). No food shortage, no war, no other crisis kills children at this rate and speed. Why shouldn’t the world make this a priority? A report entitled: State of the World’s Toilets 2018 estimated that decent toilets at home for all in Ethiopia is not expected to occur until 2370. Water.org believes that solving the multiple problems related to the water and sanitation crisis is a priority and the way to break the cycle of poverty.
Access to safe water and sanitation protects and saves lives. Solving the water crisis makes a bright future possible for all. Access to safe water and sanitation has the power to turn time spent into time saved, when these are close and not hours away. Access to safe water can turn problems into potential, unlocking education, economic prosperity, and improved health. Every human being deserves to define their own future, and water makes that possible. This is why the issue is current, and it should be the issue for all concerned.
Capital: Water.org focuses only on Water and Sanitation projects in Ethiopia. Many NGO’s do not work on Water and Sanitation issues. What initiated your focus?
Salfiso: Water.org believes there isn’t and won’t be enough charity and public funding to end the water crisis. We believe there’s a smart way to end the water crisis. Millions of people around the world could get access to safe water in their homes with the help of small, affordable loans.

Salfiso Kitabo (Photo by: Anteneh Aklilu)

The private sector should become involved. Let’s make the Water and Sanitation sector bankable. That’s where Water.org comes in. We are here to bring safe water and sanitation to Ethiopia through access to small, affordable loans. There is both a need and demand for these loans, because when people have access to safe water, they get time back to go to school, earn an income and take care of their family. It changes their world. The poor are already paying a lot to access water. Ethiopia needs charge the proper amount for accessing water. Water.org has provided it and has a measurable record of success for more than 25 years.
Capital: Water management in urban areas is complicated, particularly in developing countries. Why is this so?
Salfiso: Water management is complicated because we do not understand the value of Water. We do not understand and prioritize it. We do not realize that the wording and expectations for delivery in the water and sanitation sector is changing. There is already a move from “reduce by half” to “universal access”, a move from “improved” to “safely-managed”. The expectations and the wordings are ambitious. We plan to move everyone from the current few figures to 100? Can we get that? No. Not knowing these facts are among the main reasons for mismanaging the water sector.
Capital: What is required to improve access to drinking water and sanitation for peri-urban areas and secondary centers, what would make it possible to better fight against poverty? What needs to change?
Salfiso: The most important thing for change is stopping confusion. Clarity in the role and responsibility gets us to success in services delivery half-way. Government and development partners should work towards creating clarity in the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder. Some Institutions are preserving the problem to which they are the solution. Most are externalizing the problems created. This does not help. This must change. Depending on pubic funding and Charities for Water and Sanitation should change and change now. The water supply and sanitation (WSS) sector in Ethiopia requires fresh thinking and bold approaches to accelerate progress toward full access.
Capital: Goal 6 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2030 states “Ensure water and sanitation for all.” How is Water.Org helping Ethiopia meet the 2030 goal?
Salfiso: Water.org Globally has already reached 13 Million people by mobilizing USD one billion in capital from private banks and Micro Finance Institutions (MFI’s). This is an unthinkable source of funding for the sector. Which donor or public funding could avail this amount through a single initiator like Water.org? In Ethiopia in just less than a year three private MFI’s (Metemamen, Vision Fund and SFPI) were able to give out loans totaling 18,613,654-birr that reached 22,423 individuals. The loan repayment rate is 99.9%. This is an unheard of amount in the land where supply of water is expected from the government or NGO’s. Anyone interested in seeing how all this works can visit Mojo, Boditi, Fiche etc.
Capital: Ethiopia is one of the poorest countries across the globe, can the poor build toilets or install pipelines for water by borrowing money from the bank?
Salfiso: My straight forward answer is a big YES. Why yes? Because it worked, we did it. MFI’s did it. As I said earlier, three private MFI’s alone (out of the 38 in the country) were able to mobilize 18,613,654 birr and reach 22,423 individuals. Water.org did a market assessment before starting the program in Ethiopia. We did prove there is a demand for loans to access safe water and sanitation sources. Five MFI’s namely, (Amhara Credit and Saving Institute (ACSI), Addis Ababa Credit and Saving Institute (ADCSI), Vision Fund, Metemamen and SFPI did their own independent market assessment. They all found out that there is a demand and ALL of them got approval from their board of directors to add WSS loans into their loan portfolio. Yes, the Water Credit model of Water.org works. One can only imagine if the entire 38 MFI’s and the 18 Banks got involved in this sector.
One thing we need to be clear about is that we are not talking about the very poor families or communities. We are talking a bout the better off poor who are already paying a lot of money to access clean water. All poor are not equally poor. I am saying this because some are at a higher level as well are saying we are putting the poor into debt. We are talking about the better off poor who have lined up for a hand out from the government and donors. The poorest of the poor can get subsidies from donors, NGO’s and the Government. Water.org is not against charity work. We are only saying let’s divide the poor into the better off poor and those who need subsidies and charity.
Capital: When it comes to funding and aid from Western countries, do you have any idea what the estimated aid amount is right now for sanitation related issues?
Salfiso: Annual aid for water and sanitation amounts to only USD 8 billion – far short of the USD one trillion needed to solve this crisis and maintain access long term. Globally, to achieve SGD 6 targets, it would require USD 114 billion per year starting in 2015 to solve the water crisis by 2030. This USD 114 billion amount is 3x more than the current global investment in water and sanitation. To achieve these targets in Ethiopia, the nation will require more than USD two billion annually. There is no way you can get this amount of funding from anywhere that is why we in water.org say turn your eyes to the private sector and make the sector bankable.
Capital: You have been the chief of Water.org, for over a year now. What are the Major challenges you have experienced?
Salfiso: The biggest challenge is the misunderstanding of NGO work with MFI’s. If you are an NGO, you are there to give for free. This is the biggest challenge. The second is related to lack of policy and awareness of the policy makers and regulators in understanding the role of banks and MFI’s into the WSS sector.
Lack of loanable funds is the most critical problem, followed by lack of capacity of MFIs. The national bank has no policy which talks and includes the WSS lending as one of the priority lending schemes as it did for agriculture and energy credit schemes. This has created a dilemma. If MFI’s could take this as seriously as they do for fertilizer lending.
Capital: Are you getting the support you need from the Ethiopian government?
Salfiso: The answer is yes but not to the extent we need. I am sure this will improve. We are working with the Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Electricity to include MFI’s in the policy document. The government has given us a license to operate in Ethiopia of course. I am confident when they understand our Water Credit Model, they will fully align with us as it will solve their own problem and help them reach the commitment the government made to the world through SDG.
Capital: Open defecation has been a major challenge in Ethiopia. Millions still relieve themselves outside in public how is Water.Org doing working to stop this menace in the country?
Salfiso: We all know in Ethiopia eating in public is a shame but urinating on the side of the road is not. We need to change that. Availing affordable toilets in each house will make things better. We need to avoid the campaign mode of doing things around WSS but focus on a mindset and behavioral change. We believe a changed mind will lead to renouncing open defecation instead of practicing it.
Capital: How can we convince political decision-makers to better understand and to work harder on sanitation issues?
Salfiso: Decision makers at all levels should understand that the extent of water crisis and the level of commitment we make as a nation is huge and not attainable at the current pace. All concerned should bring their heads together and talk. We are only 11 years away from 2030, which is the end of SDG. Considering the significant resources needed for the sector, there is a need to mobilize domestic resources through commercial banks and micro finance institutions (MFI).
Making the WSS bankable and subject to commercial loans is paramount. There are over 38 MFI’s and 18 commercial banks in Ethiopia. These MFI’s and banks including WASH loans to their loan portfolio will help government and WASH charities free up their limited funds and focus their efforts in a more targeted way on the poorest. The resources in these private sectors include more than the funds to be mobilized by public, bilateral donors and NGO’s.
Our recommendations to further develop the potential use of micro-finance for the WASH sector include: making the national bank and development bank include the WASH lending as one of the priority lending schemes as they did for agriculture, income generating and energy credit schemes. They should convince the commercial banks and development bank to allocate dedicated capital for MFIs to take loans from these banks and lend the money out for household water and sanitation self-financing as these MFI’s are within the communities. A mechanism should be put in place to recognize household lending as is done for groups.

Leather’s difficult times

External challenges like the latest perk of US and China trade war, revised FDI policies besides slow interest of the international market is continuing bleeding local and foreign trade of the Ethiopian leather industry.
The leather sector is one of the major historical sources of hard currency like coffee, while this day it has been substituted by other commodities like horticulture and khat.
The Leather Industry Development Institute (LIDI) stated that the latest trade war between the two world’s biggest economies has affected the export of leather and leather goods.
Berhanu Sirjabo, public relations head of LIDI said that the country’s export has been affected by the trade war between the US and China, who imposed tariffs on each other’s imports.
The public relations head claimed that the trade war affects the country’s revenue directly and indirectly. Both sides would buy our products and export to each other’s country, but this has now slowed due to the tariff that both countries imposed on each other in the past few months.
Experts at the Ethiopian Leather Industries Association (ELIA) said that the sector is going through a serious problem locally even though the international trend like the US China trade war is also pressuring the sector externally.
The leather sector actors are strongly arguing that the leather sector has declined in the past five years, despite the government’s statement that it has shown a slight improvement in investment and export revenue.
Local tannery owners who requested anonymity claimed that the government has been deliberately or ignorantly affecting the sector through its policy which was amended in the past years.
“The sector has been built for nearly seventy years and was expected to brew better achievements in these days, but the reality is different,” they complained.
Yared Alemayehu, owner of Wallia Leather and Leather Products and former president of ELIA, said that the problem in the leather sector is very wide and directly pointed to the government’s policy.
“In the sector we the local actors have over a half century of experience, but all of a sudden in the past five years it has collapsed. It has to be asked why the collapse occurred,” Yared said. “If the problem is seen in one or two factories it would likely be due to mismanagement by the companies but the problem is seen in all actors. Therefore, the government body considers that it is a problem of mismanagement by local companies and lack of competition with FDIs’ that invested in the sector around a decade ago,” he added.
That has caused stakeholders to develop incorrect policy in the sector and replace the former policy that only favor FDIs, according to the sector actors.
“Since the policy change is in favor of FDIs there is another question, does the country benefit in export revenue, value addition, technology and even employment? But the answer is that the sector does not show any change regarding the stated questions,” Yared told Capital.
Ethiopia’s rank in livestock population is 8th in the world while India is not far from Ethiopia in terms of the population number of livestock but the export of India excluding local business has reached USD 17 billion. “When it comes to the Ethiopian leather sector it did not show any change meanwhile the number of the size of FDIs increased,” experts said when pondering the role of FDI and its contribution.
“When FDIs expanded in the country why did the export revenue become stuck at the level where Ethiopian actors performed about a decade ago,” they asked.
They argued that the current export revenue is not comparable from the performance a decade ago.
“Ten years ago we exported natural leather, but now export items for instance footwear produced by synthetic materials is registered as the export of leather goods.”
“If excluding the non leather goods like the synthetic footwear and then comparing the leather export from exports ten years ago the current hard currency generation is lower than what we achieved years back,” they claimed.
“At the past we have earned the same export revenue by only the export of semi finished and finished leather not by exporting footwear. If they said that export of leather goods expanded why did the sector earn the same amount that we have contributed,” they asked.
In 2008 the government has imposed a high levy on the export of raw hide and skins and wet blue, pickle and crust, which are semi processed products to encourage the local production of finished leather and boost the country’s hard currency revenue.
Against the investment proclamation of 2003 the government has allowed foreign investors to invest in the leather sector from scratch which was claimed as illegal and affects the local investors.
The 2003 investment proclamation stated that FDI shall invest from the semi processed; while the local investor is protected to produce from raw to crust on the concept the country has adequate capacity to process by local investors. “But without a law the government has allowed FDI’s to invest from the raw level that we argued it is a displacement of local investors,” experts claimed, “they even amended the investment proclamation that highly favors the FDI without evaluating the outcome of the allowed foreign investors in the sector.”
They argued that the government policy has affected one of the oldest businesses that Ethiopian developed for close to 70 years.
“We have argued that the foreign investors do not have a long term vision and that they are now engaged on environmental challenges, lack of working safety,” they claimed.
Currently about 16 local tanneries have suspended their production, however the government claimed that there are 8, according to sources. The sector has been one of the major areas to manage a huge amount of employees, but it declined.
Experts also claimed that the other reason the sector did not show improvement in revenue is that the FDI’s export their products for their chained companies or affiliates by offering a lower price or under invoice.
“If the sector was protected on some level for local investors the customs shall cross check the cost of production of the finished and goods products, but when we challenged the idea allowing foreign investors to engage on all sectors the officials ridiculed us and blamed us saying that we are backward,” experts claimed.
According to Berhanu, the limited capacity of Ethiopian leather goods manufacturers regarding the management and weak technological capability also negatively affects the sector. “Technological transfer on the sector is the major issue that the sector needs is tackling the inner challenge, while the external challenge is difficult to be solved,” Berhanu said.
“When the technology advanced at the leather industries the sector shall keep the standard and improve the export value and volume,” he argued.
“The Prime Minister shall interfere and solve the problem by changing the policy,” local actors expressed hopefully.
Experts at the association have also stated that the international trends in the past couple of years have changed in the leather sector.
Currently the synthetic industry is booming and major manufacturers are also engaged in the sector that affects the Ethiopian export.
“The sector is very dynamic which also is a significant factor in the slowdown of the Ethiopian leather sector in the past couple of years,” sources at the association said.
According to Berhanu the country has now a capacity to produce 20 million pairs of footwear per annum for the export market, while the revenue expected from the sector has not grown as per the expectation. “Currently the country has a single factory that shall produce 50,000 pairs of footwear per day,” Berhanu indicated. The country’s revenue from leather and leather goods exports stood at USD 134 million based on the past budget year’s performance.
At the end of the first Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP I) the government has targeted to generate half a billion USD, while the actual performance did not show change for the past decade.
In the past few years the sector investment has grown significantly. For instance the number of tanneries has reached 32 from 20 about a decade ago, but some local tanning facilities became bankrupted, according to the sector actors.
“Previously they have killed the local investors by buying the product with high price and now they are saying they do not want to use the local raw material that is the reason for price reduction and wastage of the national resource,” a tannery owner, who declined to be named, told Capital. “Currently we are very few struggling to service, while most of them are out of the market,” he said. “The companies that currently existing are also in trouble of heavy debt and even consumed significant amount of running cost in the past ten year,” he added, “if the government want the existence for the industry has to right off the debt of the companies what Egypt made in the past.”
However even the number of tanneries increased more, in the past couple of years the raw material price has significantly dropped and that forced to waste the resource. To keep the resource from wastage the government itself is engaged on buying the raw hide and skin from suppliers on major holiday seasons and processed the raw to semi stage via private tanneries.
On the latest holiday, Christmas, the raw hide and skin has been rated a price of up to 25 birr and 35 birr for goat and sheep skin respectively, while the demand of hide is very low that it has been sold by 4 birr per kilogram. The institute official said that lack of industrial salt has been slowed the hide trading on the holiday morning but it has been revived in the afternoon after the collectors encouraged to use edible salt as optional.
There are 24 footwear factories and from those 16 are engaged in the export market. The international trend indicated that the price of footwear is from USD 9 to 23, but the locally produced footwear is not worth more than USD 13.

EUROPEAN SPRING

0

The ‘European Spring’, if one may call it that, is a bit different from that of the ‘Arab spring’. For a start, the European insurrection has been methodical and dawdling. Nonetheless, they both utilized the operational tactic of flooding the streets. After the 2008 financial crisis, the European sheeple (human mass) was severely impacted by the austerity measures enacted by the various nation states in collaboration with the EU, IMF, EC, etc. In many of the European countries the disillusioned mass of humanity ultimately decided to form new alliances that could challenge the status quo. Popular sovereignty became the overriding objective amongst the seemingly opposed groups within the whole political spectrum. In addition, the desire to open up the sphere of political and economic governance unified the diverse collective. Most importantly and unlike the Arab Spring, the ‘European Spring’ is happening in the very womb of the beast itself, so to speak! See the articles next column, on page 44.
These new movements, parties and coalition are espousing fresh ideas, like ‘direct democracy.’ The Swiss are known for such a system (frequent referendum) and now the French also want to have the same!
It is in Greece where it all started. As the TROIKA (EC, ECB, IMF) was flexing its muscle over the Greece economy during the global financial crisis, its sheeple decided to abandon the old political parties and tried setting up new ones, away from the center. Syriza, a left leaning party came to power by traditional democratic means, i.e., elections. Nevertheless, Syriza’s grand plan to challenge the policies imposed by the TROIKA didn’t see the light of day. Soon thereafter, the youth of Greece joined their brethren from Eastern Europe in the mass exodus that characterized post USSR Europe. Unbeknownst to many a sheeple, this mass exodus still continues today! According to the conditionality imposed by the TROIKA, Greece’s national assets were sold off to transnational capital, whose primary objective is of course to make money, not the welfare of the Greece sheeple! Then came PODEMOS and INDIGNADOS in Spain. Again, PODEMOS is a left leaning political party formed to counter the austerity policies of the TROIKA. Election got PODEMOS to power or rather to power sharing, but its policies had to be diluted to accommodate its coalition partners. At the end of the day, it is still the TROIKA that has the upper hand in deciding the economic policy of Spain, Portugal, etc.!
Probably the most significant departure from the current globalization project of transnational capital was the decision by the British sheeple to withdraw from the EU, altogether! The gamble the then prime minster took resulted in what is now called Brexit. Not long after this significant referendum, the US sheeple also decided to go for the jugular and elected Mr. Trump, but Mr. Trump is no radical. Even though many consider him as an outsider. Mr. Trump had to rely on the old Republican Party machinery to win the election. Unlike Europe, setting up a new political party of significance is not really possible in the ‘land of the free’! Be that as it may, the ‘deep state’ was/is not happy about the outcome, hence the political brouhaha in D.C. The change momentum that started in Greece has now overtaken the imagination of the European sheeple. For example, the Italian sheeple came up with its unique arrangement, at least by the standard of ordinary party narrative to secure power. Five Star Movement (left) and Lega Nord (right) joined forces to oust old parties whose ideologies have always hovered close to the center. It is becoming increasingly clear that parties of the far ends are coming closer on many issues of practical relevance. It is common sense, more than anything else that is at work here. Ideologically centered parties that have been operating under the forceful thumb of transnational capital continue to lose political ground across Europe!
Enter the French ‘yellow vests’! Here there is a whole lot more than what meets the eye. The French are demanding not only a new government, but also a new way of popular political participation. They no longer consider ‘electoral democracy’ as adequate to the challenges of modern life. Who should blame them? Every time a politician wins a public office, it is not the interest of the sheeple he/she advocates, rather it is the greed infested agenda of transnational capital, under the auspices of the ‘deep state’. To rectify this structural democratic deficit the French sheeple is now demanding ‘direct democracy’. Today, Citizen Initiated Referendum (RIC) is the main demand of the French sheeple and it envisions a radical change in political governance. ‘The Citizen Initiated Referendum (RIC) would allow French citizens to propose their own laws that would then be voted on by the general public in a referendum that could effectively bypass the French parliament. According to the Yellow Vest movement, the RIC would not be limited to just proposing new laws but would have several other functions including repealing existing laws and referendums on amendments to the French constitution. The movement also backs the idea of a RIC to, dismiss any politician, the president, a minister, a deputy or any other elected official.’ It seems ‘electoral democracy’ is now on the ropes, while ‘participatory democracy’ is in the ascendance. Civil disobedience is going to be another of the weapons to be employed by the angry sheeple of the French republic. For instance, French citizens are threatening to instigate ‘bank run’ unless the government accepts and implements their demand.
Do not underestimate the French! In the French Revolution of 1789, they executed their king, Louis XVI and abolished the monarchy (1792). They also came up with new societal arrangements infused with highly liberating ideals. (Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.) In 1848 they also had another revolution, the February Revolution, which abolished slavery and initiated male universal suffrage. Today, the French citizens are demanding not only the overthrow of their current government but much more! In other words, they are willing to question the very foundation of the currently polarizing globalization, which of course was anointed by entrenched interests as sacrosanct. It seems we are cursed to live in interesting times, as the Chinese blessing foretells. How will the European Spring end? This is an important question, not only to the European sheeple, but also to the global populous at large. “When the government violates the people’s rights, insurrection is, for the people and for each portion of the people, the most sacred of the rights and the most indispensable of duties.” Marquis de Lafayette, 1790 (French & American General). Good Day!

CCD real-estate founder summoned to court

0

Messele Haile (PhD), founder of the Country Club Developers (CCD), has been summoned to court after people asked for his arrest.
The complainants appeared in court on January 1.
The plaintiffs had paid for six houses each resting on 1,000sqm of land and had been waiting for them over a ten year period. They then sued the real estate company and eventually the Federal High Court ruled in their favor. The court ordered the real estate company to deliver the houses in 16 months.
They were given four more months to complete the import process but still no house materialized. Then, 5 months later the creditors went to the court to force the company to deliver the homes.
Lawyers for CCD told the judge that they couldn’t deliver the houses on time because of the foreign currency shortage and the quality of products the company use for finishing materials.
The applicants wanted over one million birr in damages calculated at 30,000 birr every month of delay in getting the homes.
The applicants also reported to the court that they sent CCD three different letters notifying the company that it had failed to live up to its end of the bargain.
Tamagn Beyene, the lawyer for CCD said that it is illegal to arrest the general manager because he acted in good faith and forces beyond his control caused the company to be unable to finish the house.