Monday, September 21, 2026
Home Blog Page 4150

“A lock of hair unlocks a story”

0

the return of Emperor Tewodros’s hair by a British Museum

By Alula Pankhurst

This week witnessed a rare historic event. One hundred and fifty years after Emperor Tewodros chose to commit suicide rather than give himself up to the British forces, the UK National War Museum handed over two pieces of Atse Tewodros’s hair, to H.E. Dr Hirut Kassaw, Ethiopia’s Minister of Culture. The ceremony took place at the Museum in London on Wednesday 20th of March in the presence of H.E. Ato Fisseha Shawel the Ethiopian Ambassador to the UK and the Director of the United Kingdom’s National Army Museum, Brigadier Justin Maciejewski DSO MBE. Among other dignitaries was Lemn Sissay, the Chancellor of Manchester University, who tweeted the succinct title of this article.
This is a small but important step and a welcome goodwill gesture, resulting from persistent diplomatic initiatives of the Ethiopian Government and its Embassy in London. During her visit to the UK last year Dr Hirut Woldemariam, the Minister of Culture protested that “Displaying human parts in websites and museums is inhumane”. In response the National Army Museum the same month removed the image of the hair stuck on a letter from Emperor Tewodros bearing his seal from their display and their website.
The Emperor’s plaits
The classical images of Atse Tewodros portray him, as also Atse Yohannes, wearing his gungun plaits. Ethiopians will therefore be saddened to hear that the two bits of hair that have been returned are only small snippets. So how did they find their way to the UK and the National Army Museum? and what happened to the rest of his shurrubba?
When the British troops finally stormed the Amba of Meqdela, on the 13th of April 1868 the first soldiers of the 33rd Regiment came across Atse Tewodros who had just shot himself. They only realised it was the Emperor, who was wearing plain clothes on top of his royal clothing, when they saw lying by his side the pistol that Queen Victoria had sent him with the following inscription on a silver plate:
“Presented by VICTORIA Queen of Great Britain and Ireland to THEODORUS, Emperor of Abyssinia As a slight token of her gratitude for his kindness to her servant PLOWDEN 1864”.
The conquering soldiers showed little respect for the deceased body of the Emperor, tearing parts of his bloodied shirt to take as souvenirs. In his book A History of the Abyssinian Expedition, published a year later Clements Markham wrote:
“A crowd came round the body, gave three cheers over it as if it had been that of a dead fox, and then began to cut and tear the clothes to pieces until it was nearly naked. The days of chivalry are gone!” (1869, p.352).
Frederick Myatt in his book March to Magdala concludes:
“Even Theodore did not escape the souvenir hunters: his body was left exposed for some time, during which fragments of his clothing steadily disappeared until it was practically left naked.” The corpse was then placed in a more secure situation” (1970, p.166).
The mystery of the Emperor’s hair: how many locks and where are there?.
In some of the sketches of the deceased Emperor he seems to have plaits while in others he is clean shaven or with cropped hair, suggesting his locks had been cut. Who were those who cut it and when did they do it? Markham writes in describing the deceased Emperor’s body:
“The hair was much dishevelled, crisp and coarse and done in three plaits, with little stumpy tails. But it had evidently not been dressed or buttered for days”.
So according to this source the Emperor had three plaits. Atse Tewodros’s chronicler Aleqa Taye at the end of his Chronicle notes that the Emperor’s burial was delayed by a day as the Europeans wanted to draw sketches. And indeed several sketches were made. However, although the Emperor’s corpse was carefully examined to ascertain that his death was a result of suicide, strangely no photograph seems to have by taken by the Royal Engineers, who did, however, take a picture of his son Leul Alemayehu.
Portraits of the deceased Emperor
Richard Pankhurst in an article on depictions of Emperor Theodros in the Journal of Ethiopian Studies published in 1887 describes five sketches of the deceased Emperor
One of these sketches by a British officer Major Leveson was the basis for an engraving that appeared in the Illustrated London News on 30th May 1868. In this depiction there is no sign of the Emperors tresses and he is portrayed with short cropped hair. The author adds in brackets:
“(It should be noted in this connection collectors among the British soldiers are known to have cut off some of the dead monarch’s hair, one piece of which is preserved in the National Army Museum in London)”.
Another engraving appeared in the French journal Le Tour du Monde of 1869 engraved by a Frenchman named Bayard apparently based on an English sketch. One of the most interesting sketches of the Emperor on his deathbed was made by Caption Frank James, who later produced a beautiful watercolour that can be seen on the National Army Museum website. In this Tewodros is portrayed lying on a bed made with interlaced leather straps and four posts, inside a hut with the roof and door visible. Tewodros has one eye still open, and a sad expression with a knitted brow. Most interestingly his plaits are clearly visible. What is particularly significant is that, according to Philip Marsden in his book The Barefoot Emperor, Captain Frank, who was one of the first to reach the body of the Tewodros, wrote to his mother:
” I send home to the girls a real lock of Theodore’s hair which I cut off myself and to you my dear mother, a little coin” (2007, p. 336).
We therefore know that by his own admission Captain James cut at least one lock of hair. His painting of Tewodros on his deathbed (and several other beautiful paintings of the expedition and the storming of Magdala) are in the National Army Museum. Moreover, since the Museum in its Press Release of March 4, responding to the repatriation request, stated that one of the locks of hair in their possession “was given to the Museum by a family related to an artist who painted the Emperor on his deathbed”, we can safely assume that this lock was donated by the family of Captain Frank. The provenance of the other lock remains a mystery. If the assumption that several soldiers cut locks at souvenirs is correct, there may well be more hair in public and private collections in the UK that could and should be returned.
The revealing tale of two sketches by Sir Richard Holmes
Two very different sketches of the Emperor on the day he committed suicide on 13 April 1868 were produced by Sir Richard Holmes, who was commissioned by the British Museum and accompanied the expedition to purchase artefacts. Sir Richard was also a well-known artist, who was a frequent exhibitor at the Royal Academy, the Grosvenor and New Galleries. The sketches were said by several of the Europeans who knew Tewodros personally to be very accurate in their depiction. A postcard of one of these has the caption in italics attributed to the Times correspondent: “An admirable likeness of him”.
In the first sketch, which Holmes apparently produced just fifteen minutes after his death, the Emperor’s plaits are still visible with a line at the front. The Royal Engineers took a photo of the sketch, which is in the album of the British Embassy in Addis Ababa. (I am most grateful to the Embassy, which kindly allowed me to take the photograph reproduced in this article). The photograph of the sketch is also reproduced in several books including The Abyssinian Difficulty by Darrell Bates. Another version of this sketch produced into a postcard by the London Stereoscopic and Photographic Company has the caption “Theodore / Taken at Magdala 1/4 of an hour after his death – By Mr. R.R. Holmes”
In Holmes’s second sketch produced the same day the Emperor’s hair seems to have been cut off. One version, which is in the British Museum collection, has as a caption “Theodore Emperor of Abyssinia sketched immediately after the capture of Magdala 13 April 1868 by R.R. Holmes F.S.A. Archaeologist attached to the Expedition”. Interestingly the description on the British Museum website states: “Head of King Theodore with short upstanding hair, lying back after death, with one eye opened”.
A welcome first step towards restitutive justice. What next?
After 150 years at least two pieces of Emperor Tewodros’s hair have now finally been returned, thanks to the National Army Museum transcending an historical injustice through a welcome act of restitution.
However, the remains of his son Leul Alemayehu remain for now buried outside St George’s chapel in Windsor Castle. The British Museum has at least nine sacred tabots belonging to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church that it has agreed never to display or show to anyone. Given the mission of museums to inform the public and the sacrilegious nature or retaining these holy objects, what is the point of a UK museum retaining these in its custody? This should be the next stage of the campaign for the restitution of the Meqdela treasures.

A Social Enterprise

0

These days we more often hear of organizations or businesses that classify themselves as a so called Social Enterprise. At a fist glance it seems contradictory, where enterprises normally are understood to make a profit from the products or services they offer, while the adjective social refers to something that is communal, collective or public. So what exactly is a Social Enterprise? A Social Enterprise may be defined as an organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in human and environmental well-being. This may include maximizing social impact alongside profits for shareholders. Social enterprises can be structured as a for-profit or non-profit, and may take the form of a co-operative, a social business, a benefit corporation, a community interest company or a charity organization. They can also take more conventional structures. What differentiates social enterprises is that their social mission is as core to their success as any potential profit. Many commercial enterprises would consider themselves to have social objectives, but commitment to these objectives is motivated by the perception that such commitment will ultimately make the enterprise more financially valuable. These are organisations that might be more properly said to be operating corporate responsibility programs. Social enterprises differ in that their commitment to impact is central to the mission of the business. Some may not aim to offer any benefit to their investors, except where they believe that doing so will ultimately further their capacity to realize their social and environmental goals, although there is a huge amount of variation in forms and activities. The term Social Enterprise has a mixed and contested heritage due to its philanthropic roots in the United States, and cooperative roots in the United Kingdom, European Union and Asia. In the US, the term is associated with ‘doing charity by doing trade’, rather than ‘doing charity while doing trade’. In other countries, there is a much stronger emphasis on community organising and democratic control of capital and mutual principles, rather than philanthropy. In recent years, there has been a rise in the concept of social purpose businesses which pursue social responsibility directly, or raise funds for charitable projects.
In our own context I’d like to refer to a Social Enterprise as an enterprise that directly addresses social needs through their products and services or through the numbers of disadvantaged people they employ. This distinguishes them from “socially responsible businesses”, which create positive social change indirectly through the practice of corporate social responsibility. There are some well-established Social Enterprises in Ethiopia, that offer products and services alongside employment and training of disadvantages young boys and girls and they have made a real impact in society over the years. It is less common for individual entrepreneurs to set up a business as a Social Enterprise. Last week I happened to have lunch in a new restaurant in Sarbet and met with the owner who explained how he and his wife had set up their new business, Temsalet Kitchen. Their vision is to provide an opportunity for young drop-out girls and single mothers. They train and mentor their employees in order to unfold their full potential. The restaurant therefore offers currently 18 motivated women out of challenging life circumstances the chance to turn oppressions into opportunities. By working for Temsalet Kitchen the hired women do not only receive a decent salary but experience acceptance, hope and confidence. The intention of Temsalet, meaning exemplary, is that the trained employees will pass on their gained knowledge and experience to other vulnerable girls and women and by doing so starting a movement of empowerment. Furthermore Temsalet hosts regularly events on social issues that especially concern women.
An example of a true Social Enterprise is my conclusion, offering quality food, as well as facilities for work meetings and private events, while making an important social impact.

(Temsalet Kitchen around Sarbet, ground floor of KOICA building, 0911331559)

ton.haverkort@gmail.com

Abraham Mebratu’s joke on U-20’s Bamako return leg

0

Here comes Abraham with no tactical or technical analysis of the sport about Wednesday’s 1-1 home draw against visitors Mali U-20 national team. He didn’t tell us why we lost the game to a team that reached Addis Ababa less than twenty four hours before the game with three of their main players even reached hours before kick-off.
His focus was on his team’s superior ball possession and creating some good goal scoring chances. He stated Amanuel G/Kidan contributed lots despite injury. But he did not tell us that the home side domination was far from danger areas and Amanuel’s supply was cut short because of the mid field. Above all he never mentioned strong sides of Mali that managed to return home with a draw even being under such challenges. He failed to mention their discipline at defense and fast counter attack that almost earned them a winning goal at the final minutes.
Abraham promised an easy win on Tuesday’s away return leg contradicting his word that Mali is the strongest team in West Africa. Although football fans didn’t take it seriously, both Mekelakeya’s Seyoum Kebede and Jimma AbaJifar’s Zemariam told us the same joke days before they got booted out of tournaments. The same goes to Abraham who has better experience in public relation and media consumption.
“I am happy with the team’s performance and we were far better than Mali in both ball possessions and goal trials. Tactically my players were good and we were better in dominating ball possessions and creating chances. I am sure we will back from Bamako booking qualification” Abraham suggested.
In his turn the Malian Coach Fugnyeri Diyara told reporters that there is nothing to wait for Mali has already qualified for next stage. “You lost on your own back yard and now it is our turn and consider it done” Diyara remarked.

Mohammed Ben Salem

0

Name: Mohammed Ben Salem

Education: BA in Business Management

Company name: MAM Snack

Title: Owner

Founded in: 2016

What it does: Making and selling snack foods

HQ: Gelan

Number of employees: 20

Startup Capital: USD 200,000

Current Capital: Growing

Reason for starting a Business: Small Snack cafes in Addis

Biggest perk of ownership: Doing what I want

Biggest strength: Commitment

Biggest challenge: None

Plan: To make a new variety of snack for kids

First career: Business management worker

Most interested in meeting: Bill Gates

Most admired person: Bill Gates

Stress reducer: Spending time with my child

Favorite past-time: Working

Favorite book: The Quran

Favorite destination: Tunis

Favorite automobile: Toyota Land Cruiser