Friday, October 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 4354

History, taking us forward in art

0

“The single act of providing and promoting public art will have transformational impact…”
Alexander “Skunder” Boghossian and GebreKristos Desta were prolific Ethiopian painters who played significant roles in “modernizing” art in Ethiopia. Both were born in the 1930’s; studied traditional church art in the 40’s; went to Europe on art scholarships in the ‘50’s; and returned to Ethiopia in the ‘60’s to teach art and work as studio artists. Finally, both embraced politically and socially charged, Pan African philosophy, which was reflected in their work.  The two marvels of Ethiopian modern art connected diverse subjects, contemporary concepts and new media, resulting in what some would call the beginning of the contemporary art movement in Ethiopia; still prominent on the Ethiopian art scene. Unfortunately, their fresh and innovative approach drew heavy criticism as both were accused of turning their backs on the Ethiopian art standard of the day, for European styled painting.
On the other hand, Henri Matisse and Pablo Picasso, French and Spanish respectively, were born in the late 1800’s, studied in their home countries, and are well known masters of fine art. There initial artistic styles were referred to as impressionism, the art movement of the day in Europe. However, Matisse and Picasso, much like Skunder and Gebrekristos, merged new concepts, shapes and forms to create a new art movement. Matisse drew from African artistic expressions found in his collection of Kuba cloth from the Democratic Republic of Congo, made from woven raffia palm fibers. While masks, sculptures and literature on Africa, brought to Paris museums including the Trocadéro in the early 1900’s, would inform their work substantially. The two are recognized as primary activators of a new era in European and world art history, called cubism, derived from post-impressionism combined with the treatment of African sculptures.
Trust me, this is not a piece on art history, instead it’s a commentary on how we shape the future of art in Ethiopia. One obvious dichotomy to overcome is how two brilliant sets of artists, received opposite reactions for their innovation.  Skunder and Gebrekristos were decried for using European styles while Matisse and Picasso were celebrated for cubism; a clear though not acknowledged appropriation of African art. This can be analyzed politically, socially, economically, spiritually and culturally, which I leave to you dear avid reader. My aim here is to juxtapose art history with a vision for the 21st century of fine art in Ethiopia. And though current Ethiopian artists are encouraged to explore contemporary art forms through the pedagogics of Ethiopian art schools, there is a disconnect with buyers and collectors as related to emerging contemporary artistic expression.
Now, don’t get me wrong, in art you like what you like and buy what you like. The issue here is how does a society learn to see and appreciate new art forms? Answer…exposure. It is essential to developing a market for inventive art forms from sound and video art to installations, street and rubber art.  Even good ole paintings and drawings that provoke and shock the senses, require consideration and backing.
So as art creates opportunities for idiosyncratic conversations within ourselves and with the artists, whom we sometimes strain to comprehend. The process can be daunting. Some buyers, whose wallets are flush with money, are intimidated if not embarrassed at their shortage of knowledge and after a couple of minutes in front of a novel work, they walk away with the cash remaining in their coiffeurs. This discomfort zone, has myriad effects including, loss of support for an artist and loss of a significant for the collector. Equally disturbing, it encourages artists to play it safe with subjects, colors and compositions, which sell like kolo.  So what do we do to ensure buyers purchase with confidence and artists create freely?
Public art is defined as “…any media planned and executed with the intention of being staged in the physical public domain, usually outside and accessible to all… ”. Public art is arguably an integral part of the solution.  Though we are beginning to see change, like the 100 meter long urban art mural on the Coke Factory wall in Turhailuch, conceived by Merid Tafesse in collaboration with several artists, much more must be done. Public art allows thousands of people all walks of life to view and interact with art on a daily and organic basis. This interaction sensitizes the public and allows the eye to open, creating questions, opening minds.
So, as urban development progresses in Addis Ababa and throughout Ethiopia for that matter, leaders in public and private sector should entertain, encourage and support innovative expressions of art for traffic circles, buildings, public parks, highway walls etc. The single act of providing and promoting public art will have transformational impact on artists busting with innovation, art lovers seeking inspiration and art buyers eager to build collections.

Dr. Desta Meghoo is a Jamaican born Creative Consultant, Curator and cultural promoter based in Ethiopia since 2005. She also serves as Liaison to the AU for the Ghana based, Diaspora African Forum.

The US trade war and its global impact

0

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the President of the American Action Forum, a center-right advocacy group, and a former Director of the Congressional Budget Office under President George W. Bush, called a trade war “the big risk to Trump’s success.” Manuel Perez-Rocha, an Associate Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies, also said “a full blown trade war is dangerous for both sides. United States exporters can be badly damaged.”
President Donald Trump, on his part, tweeted  on 20 April 2018 arguing otherwise as “When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win, example, when we are down USD 100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It is easy!”
Practially speaking , President Donald Trump’s trade war is heating up. Days after imposing tariffs on USD 34 billion worth of Chinese exports, with an additional USD 16 billion under consideration, the administration of President Trump announced that it was also contemplating tariffs on an extra USD 200 billion worth of Chinese-made products. Just over a month ago, President Trump had also imposed punitive tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from such allies as the EU, Mexico and Canada.
Europe, Mexico and Canada have retaliated, so did China and it has promised to continue retaliation should the United States impose additional tariffs. President Trump is betting that he can win this war. After all, China exports over USD 500 billion to the United States, while the United States exports only USD 130 billion to China.
Doug Irmin, Economic Professor at Dartmouth argued that the effects of President Trump’s trade war will be material. First, punitive tariffs will immediately raise the price of the goods affected. Retaliatory action by the EU, Canada, Mexico and China will do the same to their economies. According to Doug Irmin, President Trump has already threatened that the Canadians and Europeans  will “make a mistake” if they retaliate. There is no reason to believe that President Trump will not answer each counter-tariff with more tariffs of his own. Before we know it, retaliatory actions will be mounting on top of retaliatory actions and consumer prices on a wide spectrum of goods will rise around the world.
But more importantly, Doug Irmin further noted that President Trump’s tariff actions may also destroy global supply chains. These have been built into the DNA of large manufacturing firms all over the world. However, way beyond just benefiting the “biggies,” they also provide jobs in many small firms that are an integral part of these supply chains.
Manuel Perez-Rocha stated that if tariffs and counter-tariffs disrupt this very efficient global division of labor, this indirect consequence of tariffs comes at a cost in inflation that will be a multiple of the direct price effects from punitive tariffs. ‘Ditto’ with just-in-time delivery; which is highly correlated to global supply chains. If it gets unwound, storage costs will rise and so will related consumer prices.
According to Manuel Perez-Rocha, once inflation begins to take hold, there is a more insidious effect it has on prices, usually referred to as “inflationary expectation.” It holds that corporations, consumers, even governments expect next year’s inflation to be just as bad or even worse. In preparing for such event, they make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. To be sure, moderate inflation can be a good thing, especially when it is caused by a booming economy and higher wages increasing the net wealth of large parts of the population.
But this is notably not the scenario of a trade war. Inflation, in this case, is not the result of a booming economy, but it is an externality which no private sector economic agent can control. Therefore, global growth will fall, jobs will be lost, yet prices will jump. Welcome to an economist’s greatest nightmare: Stagflation.
Joshua Meltzer, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute, explained that stagflation puts monetary policy in a conundrum. On the one hand, high inflation demands an increase in interest rates to maintain price stability. Yet at the same time, depressed economic growth demands low interest rates to stimulate the economy.
According to Joshua Meltzer, the exit strategy from stagflation is an uncertain one unless one reverses the original triggers for its occurrence, in this case removes the new tariffs. It is hard to imagine that the administration of President Trump would have the courage for such admission of policy failure.
Accepting the risk of stagflation is especially ludicrous when history has shown that tariffs will simply not bring jobs back to America. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs signed into law by President Herbert Hoover in 1930 and the retaliatory counter-tariffs were a major factor in the Great Depression. As recently as March 2002, the newly-elected President George W. Bush too imposed steel tariffs. After they were found in violation of the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO), they were lifted in December 2003, but not before some 200,000 jobs had been lost in the United States as a consequence.
Doug Irmin adamantly argued that jobs were lost, because for every single steel factory job created, several more jobs vanished in industries that needed to purchase the pricier steel. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, each steel job saved cost the United States economy USD 400,000.
The President’s romantic yearning for the days when America used to be “great,” when industry was protected and when manufacturing jobs were plentiful, brings to memory the words of Robert F. Kennedy, who once said: “There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the presence and invoke the security of a comfortable past, which, in fact, never existed.”

Big fish Getaneh Kebede signed with Saint George

1

Despite the failure to retain the Premier League title for a record fifth season, Saint George head coach Carlos Manuel Vas Pinto appeared to survive the axe thus started a buildup signing new players. “The Horse Riders” managed to lure Ethiopian Football big fish Getaneh Kebede to their wing.
Though unheard of Giorgis to tolerate a head coach that lost a title any which way this time reason appeared to prevail over emotion therefore Pinto, who won the love as well the respect of the younger players got the blessing of the Board of Directors for a second chance. Likely to send home the veterans, the likes of Degu Debebe, Abebaw Butako and Adane Girma, Pinto started collecting young talents as well strikers with potential of banging at least an average of 16 goals a season.
As usual the players’ transfer news getting through quiet and smooth with the players’ safe landing in to Saint George came out official through the media all three pictured donning the famous “Yellow with Red” jersey that go along with the “V” sign.
Dedebit’s rising striker Abel Yalew and Champions Jimma AbaJifar right winger Henok Aduna were the first to pen down each with a two year contract but the term as usual undisclosed. Then three days later the big fish that finished Top Scorer of the season in three occasions Getaneh Kebede back from three weeks’ vacation in Germany signed a “would be the biggest of the new season” two years contract. All smile Getaneh seen in media receiving formerly Ume Mohammed’s number “9” shirt. Insiders’ disclosed that Getaneh to became the first Ethiopian Footballer to earn a four million plus worth contract.

Ethiopia’s Olympic protester Feyisa Lilesa to return from exile

0

Feyisa Lilesa, Ethiopian long distance runner who took the country’s famed anti-government protest gesture to the Olympics has confirmed that he is now ready to return home.
Lilesa crossed his hand above his head after crossing the line in his race at Rio Olympics two years ago. He went into self-imposed exile after the games.
Whiles other athletes returned to Addis Ababa, he went to the United States and has since been residing in Arizona with his family – who joined him later. He based his refusal to return on the fact that his life would be in danger.
But he says current reforms indicate that his fear does not exist anymore. “I was waiting for a change to happen in the country. And there are changes after the new prime minister came to power.
“There is a chance I will be running again for my country,” he added. He hasn’t represented Ethiopia since Rio despite running a number of Marathons across the world.
Earlier this week, local media outlets reported that the country’s athletics and Olympic outfits had reached out to him to return home. The Ethiopian Olympic Committee (EOC) and Ethiopian Athletics Federation (EAF) in a joint statement said Lilesa will be accorded a ‘hero’s welcome.’
August 2016: Lilesa takes Oromo protest symbol to the Olympics
Feyisa Lilesa, left Addis Ababa with the country’s Olympic team for Rio 2016 games in Brazil but little did anyone suspect he will make name more for a protest sign than his action on the tracks.
The long distance athlete became famous after he made an anti-government gesture at the end of his track event. He crossed his arms above his head as he finished the event as a protest against the Ethiopian government’s crackdown on political dissent – particularly on persons in his home region of Oromia.
He won the silver medal in the men’s marathon after finishing the 42 kilometer race. He later claimed that his life was in danger. He has since leaving Rio been residing in the United States. He has in interviews rejected claims that he had sought asylum.
He has often traveled to participate in marathons across the world, he failed to make the podium in London but won gold in Bogota. His wife and two kids were subsequently allowed to join him in the U.S. (africanews).