Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 3504

Dealing with mediocrity

0

Why it is that workers don’t perform as well as they could and what can we to get them to give their best for the company? I hear of unemployed people begging for a job, being given the opportunity to work, kissing the feet of their employer and only months later turn against the same employer complaining about the working conditions they accepted so eagerly. I hear of workers speaking badly behind the backs of their employer, forgetting that the same employer provides a salary which makes it possible to pay the bills. And I also hear employers complain about the poor working ethics of their staff. Why is this so and what can be done about it? This is complex material and no one answer will do the trick. There are many factors involved here related to both the workers and the company. So let us examine some of these factors a bit closer. Performance is the result of personal attributes of workers, the effort they put in and the organizational support they receive. All three factors must be present in order for performance to be achieved. If any of the three factors is absent, then performance will seriously deteriorate. In order to get maximum result or maximum performance, each of the factors need to be maximised. Managers must therefore understand how these three factors, acting either alone or in combination, can affect performance results.
We need therefore to realize that:
Individual attributes relate to capacity to perform.
Work effort relates to a willingness to perform.
Organizational support relates to the opportunity to perform.
Individual attributes include three broad categories, namely demographic characteristics (e.g. gender, age, ethnicity), competency characteristics (aptitude or ability) and personality characteristics (what a person is like). From a performance management point of view the individual attributes must match task requirements to facilitate job performance.
Work effort relates to the motivation of the worker. Even if the employee fits the task requirements as closely as possible, it does not necessarily mean that performance will be high. In order to achieve high levels of performance, even people with the right capacities must have the willingness to perform. If in a factory for example, workers have the same academic qualifications, skills and experience, their individual performance may vary considerably. Why is this so? Part of the answer lies indeed in each person’s motivation to work. Hard work however does not necessarily mean that performance will be high too. Motivation predicts work effort, which in turn, combines with individual attributes and organizational support to predict performance. The challenge of managers is than to find ways of positively influencing other people’s motivation to work. The willingness to work ultimately lies with the individual. It is therefore in the manager’s interest to understand and learn more about the psychology of motivation.
Organizational support is the third factor of the individual performance equation. Even if personal attributes and motivation are high, performance may still leave much to be desired, because there is inadequate support in the workplace. Typical constraints could include: lack of time, inadequate budgets, inadequate tools, equipment, supplies, unclear instructions & information, lack of required services and help from others, or inflexibility of procedures.
Almost anybody will face one or more of such constraints at some point in her or his career. Having to rush a job because of a short deadline, insufficient tools, unclear instructions are common examples. It is the responsibility of managers to ensure that organizational support for performance exists in their areas of supervisory responsibility.
Over the next few weeks we will go a bit deeper into the above mentioned factors, more especially some of the individual attributes and motivation issues, in order to understand better why some workers perform well and others not, even though they have the same qualifications. In Ethiopia, we need to realize as well that there still hangs a heavy negatively charged cloud over business owners, who try to earn a living for themselves and their employees. By many, including their own employees, they are still seen as exploiters, who want to get rich quick at the expense of their workers and customers. While there are certainly business owners who fit this description, it is in my opinion necessary to change this perception and try to understand some of the constraints business owners themselves face in the process of building an honest business, which provides employment opportunities for others. Collecting the monthly pay cheque and not putting in the best you have is simply not ethical as well.

ton.haverkort@gmail.com

Patricia Fasil

0

Name: Patricia Fasil

Education: BA in Marketing Management

Company name: Soultech software development

Title: Cofounder

Founded in: 2018

What it does: Software & development

HQ: Bole

Number of employees: 4

Startup Capital: 22,000 birr

Current Capital: Growing

Reason for starting the business: Technology will dominate the future

Biggest perk of ownership: Working with my partners

Biggest strength: Company culture

Biggest challenge: The adaptability of the market

Plan: To build the silicon valley of Ethiopia

First career: Sales person

Most interested in meeting: President Sahelewerk Zewdie

Most admired person: My coworkers

Stress reducer: Hanging out with my team

Favorite past-time: None

Favorite book: Rich Dad Poor Dad

Favorite destination: Tanzania (Dar es selam)

Favorite automobile: Volkswagen

“GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE…”

“We have always been modern.” Etege Menen Asfaw

Melkam Addis Amet dear readers! With the New Year comes resolutions; one of mine is to support the process of giving credit where credit is due. The purpose? To recognize and record significant people, places, events and institutions contributing to the development of the arts in Ethiopia and Africa. I begin by applauding an artist I’ve previously mentioned, Elias Sime, 2019 Smithsonian’s National Museum of Africa Art Awardee. Elias is one of two recipients receiving the award whose unique and detailed work; emerging from historic and futuristic magi-nations, where everything is worthy to be presented and preserved; will be displayed in the Smith’s entry hall from mid- October for the viewing of thousands of visitors daily. The other winner is Nigerian Njideka Akyunyili Crosby, said to “connect Lagos to Los Angeles” through her intense colorful mixed-media paintings and collage. National Museum of African Art’s Director, Gus Casley-Hayford, said, “Both artists focus on the personal and societal impact of connection as they work with materials evocative of contemporary renewal, reuse and hybridity.”
Ethiopian artists have also been connecting us through art for decades on a platform provided in Addis by one of Ethiopia’s leading and arguably oldest partners in contemporary art, Alliance Ethio-Francaise. On September 19th “To Muse…”, a fine art exhibition curated by Mifta Zeleke, will open to the public presenting selected works from a nearly 30 year old collection of Ethiopian art possessed by the Alliance. Mifta writes in his curatorial note, “The exhibition couldn’t provide a full picture of what was exhibited in the space within the stated time period … some donated paintings are lost or migrated whereas some couldn’t actually represent the overall notions of the caliber of Ethiopia’s modern and contemporary art. But, this collection by far remains to be one of the vital means to examine the exhibition history of Ethiopia’s contemporary art.” Lost or migrated…hmmm? The curator goes on to highlight some pivotal Alliance solo shows including Tadesse Mesfine’s “Gulit”, 2001; Bekele Mekonnen’s “Enquokilish” 2004; and Dawit Abebe’s “X-Privacy”, 2009. I too invoke my pen prowess adding three of my favorite artists’ solos at Alliance including Daniel Taye’s, 2015 and Getachew Yosef’s, 2005; which by the way, was my introduction to Alliance during my first year in Ethiopia organizing Africa Unite – Bob Marley’s 60th Birthday. Finally, before my time, was Prince Merid Tafesse’s “Wood, Fire, Charcoal” in 2001/2, a turning point in Ethiopian art history where Merid, dubbed ‘The King of Charcoal’, declared charcoal and drawing mainstream media; both were usually reserved for studies. Mifta is known for curating dynamic shows and I am certain this will be no exception, especially given the 40 artists in “To Muse…”.
We have all been concerned and connected in one way or another to the ethnic violence in South Africa, but artists continue to drive conversations through works expressing the plethora perspectives of pain, fear, frustration, and helplessness. For those in South Africa this weekend, you can check out Latitude Art Fair which is being promoted as “a new platform for African art in international times – a niche-focused art fair seek(ing) to build local art audiences and promote African art…”. Executive Director, Lucy MacGarry states, “By African, we mean anyone who has a meaningful connection to Africa and the diaspora, and by international, we mean the endless permutations of trans-geographic relationships – rather than the reinforcement of values entrenched in European and American economic centres.” Whoah! Part of the 5 woman team, Business Development Director, Makgati Molebatsi adds, “…the backbone of this initiative – belongs to artists, curators, collectors, and art lovers who have felt for some time that the art market as it exists today does not yet have a place for them.” This is refreshing. Why? Truth be told, the majority of Africans still feel excluded from the contemporary art scene.
Finally I close with a reading recommendation entitled, EMPRESS MENEN CHRONICLES: An African Woman’s Journal of History and Culture edited by Dr. Asantewaa Oppong Wadie and Kwado Oppong. I was gifted the book this summer while in Chicago, but had a little time to fully read the “chronicling of the African woman’s experiences from ancient times to present” according to Dr. Asantewaa’s preface. What I loved most about the book, especially in view of the Ethiopian New Year and giving credit where credit is due, is the profile and pictures presented on Etege Menen Asfaw, wife of Qadamawi Haile Selassie. The Empress is not often written about however the book reminds us of her ‘savvy’ when it come to responding to media in defense of Ethiopia. A brilliant one liner response to journalist Joan Orth in 1955 asking “…if any of the women of her nation were also modern…?” Empress Menen sharply replied, “All of them. We have always been modern.” Bravo! Giving credit where credit is due, for 2012, let us proudly recognize and appreciate our achievements and progress as we strive for even more, daily.
May all your visions for health, wealth and happiness be created and continued.

Dr. Desta Meghoo is a Jamaican born
Creative Consultant, Curator and cultural promoter based in Ethiopia since 2005. She also serves as Liaison to the AU for the Ghana based, Diaspora African Forum.

Development and Demography

0

Tectonic demographic shifts are happening to the foundations of the world economy. Consider that about 85% of world GDP is generated in countries that face an unprecedented reversal of the population ageing pyramid. As it happens, this rapid process of population ageing is affecting developed and developing countries alike. Among developing countries, China’s leaders were early to focus on ageing-related challenges. Their country’s long-run joint approach to demographic change and development offers a useful case study for today’s poor and young countries.
Lauren Johnston, a Research Associate in School of Oriental and African Studies, at the London University stated that in 1979, leaders of then poor and demographically youthful China initiated an economic modernization agenda commonly known as “reform and opening.” The aim was for those reforms to facilitate economic development and poverty alleviation. At that time in China, poverty was endemic and hunger a major concern. The parallel implementation of a complementary population policy, which would become known as the One Child Policy, was considered a step in the direction of supporting that modernization and poverty alleviation journey.
Lauren Johnston noted that Chinese leaders foresaw, however, that a low total fertility rate and falling mortality rates, including via rising life expectancy, would also mean that China’s population structure would age more rapidly. China’s median age in 1980 was 21.9 years and had risen to 37.0 years by 2015.
Worse, there was basically no feasible rate of economic development that would mean China realise high per capita income living standards for its people – before the population itself was “old.” China, that is, would be old, and not yet rich. Worse, China’s policy makers worried that facing such aging-related challenges as a “poor” country would weigh upon China’s prospects of ever becoming a “rich” country.
What is the Economic Demography Transition?
Implicit in China being “poor-old and old” are three parallel economic demography categories: “Poor-old and young,” “rich and old” and “rich and young.” Put together, these form the Economic Demography Matrix (EDM). The Economic Demography Matrix is a simple and useful framework for categorizing countries and regions via their economic and demographic profile. By extrapolation, it also forms the basis for study of the interaction of demographic and economic transition within and across countries over time, or study of the economic demography transition.
According to Lauren Johnston, whether, for example, a country first moves from “young” to “old” or “poor” to “rich,” may be essential to understanding how demography and the economy are interacting. Japan, which got rich before it got old, and China, which is old but not yet per capita income rich, make for an interesting comparison on that point. As the world’s largest economies almost all move rapidly out of their respective demographic dividends window, understanding the particular national dynamics of economic demography over time is increasingly essential to shaping effective fiscal and monetary policies, as well as for determining needed microeconomic reforms.
Similarly, at the other extreme, today’s poor and young countries, most of which are concentrated in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, can also learn from China’s very explicit utilization of its demographic dividend for development. Hence, they can shape a long-run economic demography transition strategy, a development strategy that takes demographic change as integral.
Jean-Pierre Lehmann, emeritus Professor of international political economy at Lausanne University in, Switzerland explained that all countries, whether rich-old, rich-young, poor-old or poor-young, would best consider how to adjust fiscal and monetary policies over time accordingly, before time and opportunity are lost and change becomes even harder to make.
Jean-Pierre Lehmann argued that rapid population ageing across most of the world’s major economies is the new normal. This may serve to stagnate global growth. Whether ageing populations effectively also “age” their economies or whether economic and social structures are able to be sustainably and continuously adjust to this new structural reality will determine how late-stage demographic transition affects the future of the global economy.
And hence, whether poor-old countries (e.g., Brazil, China, Russia and Turkey), rich-old countries (most OECD economies) or poor-young countries hoping to embark on a sustained process of development, it seems timely that every country’s policymakers might best learn from China by advancing an economic demography strategy. Understanding the economic demography transition, a process that appears to have been implicit to China’s long-run development since the 1980s), is the first step in that process.