Drone strikes hit the Um Dabaker thermal power station in Rabak early on Thursday, cutting electricity to Sudan’s White Nile and North Kordofan states. The strike is part of an escalating series of attacks on energy facilities in areas controlled by the Sudanese army. … The attacks targeted the main feeders and the station’s control room, knocking the facility offline, local sources said. … The escalation represents a continued targeting of civilian infrastructure that threatens basic services, including water, health facilities, and food supplies, the legal group said. … About 13 power stations have been targeted in October, worsening the humanitarian crisis, the group noted. Sudan Tribune
Lessons from Africa’s Drone Wars
The rapid diffusion and growing use of inexpensive, attritable unmanned systems by Africa’s armed nonstate actors is reducing governments’ longstanding advantage in airpower. Armed nonstate actors across Africa are rapidly expanding their employment of commercially modified small unmanned systems, giving them an advantage over government forces. African military drone capabilities remain concentrated on imported long-endurance platforms and possess limited counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) capabilities. African governments should adopt a risk-based doctrine for countering the armed nonstate actor drone threat that combines layered C-UAS defenses, efforts to restrict illicit drone supply chains, and the integration of small unmanned systems into force structures optimized for irregular warfare. Africa Center for Strategic Studies
Jumbo Loan
A jumbo loan is a loan that exceeds Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) conforming limits for conventional mortgages. It’s often used for luxury or high-cost properties in highly expensive real estate markets.
The political economy of waste crisis in Africa
Africa stands at a critical crossroads. As the world confronts an escalating waste crisis, the continent faces a troubling question: will it inherit the waste generated by the global economy, or will it transform this challenge into an opportunity for sustainable development? From discarded electronics and plastic packaging to overflowing landfills and polluted waterways, waste is becoming an increasingly visible symbol of global inequality. Yet, beneath this environmental crisis lies a deeper political and economic question about who produces waste, who profits from its disposal, and who ultimately bears its consequences.
The World Bank’s What a Waste 3.0 report estimates that global municipal solid waste reached 2.56 billion tonnes in 2022 and could rise to 3.86 billion tonnes by 2050. Sub-Saharan Africa is projected to experience the fastest growth, with waste generation increasing by 124 per cent under a business-as-usual scenario. These figures expose a fundamental contradiction: Africa contributes relatively little to global waste generation per capita, yet it faces some of the greatest challenges in managing its waste. The question is no longer whether Africa will confront a waste crisis, but whether it will be allowed to determine its own response.
The global waste economy is deeply unequal. Wealthier countries consume more resources, generate more waste per person and possess more advanced infrastructure for waste collection and treatment. Meanwhile, developing countries frequently bear the environmental consequences of inadequate waste management and international waste movements.
The electronic waste sector illustrates this imbalance. According to the “Global E-waste Monitor 2024”, Africa generated approximately 3.5 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2022, but only 0.7 per cent was documented as formally collected and recycled. Electronic waste contains valuable materials, including copper, gold and other recoverable metals. However, it can also contain hazardous substances that threaten workers, communities and ecosystems when processed without adequate safeguards.
The problem is compounded by the international movement of discarded electronics. Some equipment enters African markets as second-hand goods, offering affordable access to technology. However, products that are obsolete, damaged or unsuitable for reuse can become waste almost immediately. The distinction between legitimate reuse and disguised waste exports is therefore essential.
The Basel Convention provides an international framework for controlling hazardous waste movements. Nevertheless, enforcement remains a challenge, particularly where customs authorities lack sufficient resources and technical capacity. Since January 2025, European Union rules have prohibited exports of all electronic waste to non-OECD countries, while imposing prior informed consent requirements on exports to OECD countries. Such measures are important, but regulations alone cannot eliminate illegal shipments or prevent waste from being mislabelled. Africa must therefore demand greater accountability from exporting countries and multinational corporations. Environmental responsibility cannot end at the border of a wealthy nation.
However, portraying Africa solely as a victim of foreign dumping would be misleading. The continent also faces a rapidly expanding domestic waste challenge driven by urbanisation, population growth, changing consumption patterns and inadequate infrastructure.
The World Bank identifies Sub-Saharan Africa as one of the regions most vulnerable to the consequences of poorly managed municipal waste. Low collection rates, open dumping and insufficient treatment infrastructure create serious environmental and public health risks. In many African cities, waste accumulates in informal settlements, drainage channels and open spaces. During heavy rainfall, blocked drainage systems increase flood risks. Plastic pollution contaminates rivers and coastal environments, while the open burning of waste releases harmful pollutants into the atmosphere.
These consequences are not distributed equally. Low-income communities often live closest to dumpsites and have the least access to reliable waste collection services. Informal waste pickers, who play a crucial role in recovering recyclable materials, frequently operate without adequate protective equipment, social security or recognition.
The paradox is striking. Waste represents both an environmental liability and an economic resource. Yet, without appropriate institutions and investment, its economic value is captured unevenly while its environmental costs are transferred to vulnerable communities.
Africa must reject the assumption that economic development requires reproducing the resource-intensive consumption patterns of industrialised countries. Instead, the continent should pursue a circular economy in which materials are reused, repaired, recycled and recovered for productive purposes.
African governments must also strengthen regional cooperation. Waste does not respect national borders, and fragmented regulatory systems create opportunities for illegal trafficking. The African Union, regional economic communities and national governments should coordinate waste trade regulations, strengthen customs enforcement and establish common environmental standards.
The African Continental Free Trade Area offers an opportunity to develop regional markets for recycled materials and circular-economy products. However, such markets must be supported by reliable infrastructure, transparent regulations and investment in local manufacturing. Crucially, the informal sector must not be excluded from this transition. Waste pickers and community-based recycling enterprises already perform essential environmental services. Formalisation should provide workers with safer conditions, fair compensation, training and access to social protection rather than displacing them in favour of large private operators.
The international community must recognise that Africa cannot resolve a global waste crisis through domestic action alone. Wealthier countries must reduce waste generation, improve product design, enforce export restrictions and provide adequate financial and technological support. Climate finance and development assistance should support waste infrastructure, including modern recycling facilities, composting systems, sanitary landfills and waste collection services. Such investment must be accompanied by transparent governance and meaningful community participation.
At the same time, African governments must demonstrate political commitment. Waste management should not be treated as a secondary municipal service but as a fundamental component of public health, urban planning and economic development. The continent’s growing population and urbanisation present an opportunity to build sustainable systems before unsustainable practices become entrenched. Investments made today can create employment, recover valuable resources and reduce the long-term costs of environmental degradation.
Will Africa inherit the waste? The answer depends on the decisions made today. If current patterns continue, the continent risks becoming both a destination for the world’s discarded materials and a producer of increasingly unmanageable domestic waste. However, this future is not inevitable.
Africa possesses the demographic potential, entrepreneurial capacity and natural resources to develop a different model of economic growth. The challenge is to ensure that these advantages are supported by effective institutions, responsible investment and environmental justice. Waste should not be understood simply as something to be discarded. It is a reflection of the economic systems that produce it and the political choices that determine its management.
Africa must therefore refuse to inherit the waste of an unequal global economy. Instead, it must inherit the opportunity to build a cleaner, more inclusive and more sustainable future. The continent’s legacy should not be a mountain of discarded materials, but a generation capable of transforming waste into wealth without sacrificing the environment or human dignity.
